{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,24]],"date-time":"2026-10-24T11:39:06Z","timestamp":1792841946423,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T14:58:09Z","timestamp":1790693889000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Transcervical balloon cervical ripening and risk of uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0783-8063","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jacques","family":"Balayla","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-9957-4225","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Allison","family":"Engo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elias M.","family":"Dahdouh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","article-title":"Trends and projections of cesarean section rates: Global and regional estimates","volume":"6","author":"Betran","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"345","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.329.7456.19","article-title":"Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous cesarean section","volume":"329","author":"Guise","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e110","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"133","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib6","series-title":"Green-top Guideline No. 45","article-title":"Birth after previous cesarean birth","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib7","article-title":"Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous cesarean section","volume":"6","author":"West","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib8","article-title":"Methods of induction of labour: a network meta-analysis","volume":"1","author":"Rattanakanokchai","year":"2026","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505","article-title":"Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review","volume":"204","author":"Kehl","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109037","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"183","author":"Ravasia","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib11","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2008","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.283.15.2008","article-title":"Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE): a proposal for reporting","volume":"283","author":"Stroup","year":"2000","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1","article-title":"Cervical ripening with transcervical Foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture","volume":"103","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1431","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1691766","article-title":"Is Foley catheter use during a trial of labor after cesarean associated with uterine rupture?","volume":"36","author":"Katz Eriksen","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2017.50","article-title":"Induction of labor by Foley catheter compared with spontaneous onset of labor after previous cesarean section: a cohort study","volume":"37","author":"Kruit","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13558","article-title":"Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix","volume":"98","author":"Huisman","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0200024","article-title":"Induction of labor after one previous cesarean section in women with an unfavorable cervix: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"13","author":"Wallstrom","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3937","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1844653","article-title":"Morbidity associated with the use of Foley balloon for cervical ripening in women with prior cesarean delivery","volume":"35","author":"Ralph","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06298-y","article-title":"Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix: a multicenter, retrospective study","volume":"306","author":"Secchi","year":"2022","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4414\/smw.2017.14532","article-title":"Safety and effectiveness of labour induction after cesarean section using balloon catheter or oxytocin","volume":"147","author":"Radan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Swiss Med Wkly"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-026-48444-z","article-title":"Uterine rupture risk during trial of labor after one cesarean in a population-based cohort study of induction method and labor management","volume":"16","author":"Roeck Hansen","year":"2026","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.12.1.42.45","article-title":"Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 vs Foley catheter","volume":"12","author":"Ben-Aroya","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-828608","article-title":"Uterine rupture in patients with a prior cesarean delivery: the impact of cervical ripening","volume":"21","author":"Hoffman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3287-4","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of labour induction in patients with a single previous caesarean section: a proposal for a clinical protocol","volume":"290","author":"Sananes","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"931","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05473-x","article-title":"Double-balloon catheter vs prostaglandin for cervical ripening to induce labor after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"301","author":"Korb","year":"2020","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.02.007","article-title":"Vaginal prostaglandin E2 vs double-balloon catheter for induction of labour for vaginal birth after caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"259","author":"Bullough","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3148","DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-024-01617-5","article-title":"Effectiveness and safety of the double intracervical balloon vs dinoprostone in patients with previous cesarean section","volume":"31","author":"Rodriguez-Zurita","year":"2024","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib28","first-page":"140","article-title":"The transcervical Foley catheter vs the vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel in the induction of labour in a previous one caesarean section: a clinical study","volume":"7","author":"Ziyauddin","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1135","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4343-7","article-title":"Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?","volume":"295","author":"De Bonrostro Torralba","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13712","article-title":"Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"99","author":"Sarreau","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14364","article-title":"Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: a randomized trial","volume":"160","author":"Sulaiman","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003448","article-title":"Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter vs vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: the MAGPOP randomised controlled trial","volume":"18","author":"Diguisto","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib33","first-page":"719","article-title":"Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease","volume":"22","author":"Mantel","year":"1959","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.2307\/2530643","article-title":"Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data","volume":"41","author":"Greenland","year":"1985","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","article-title":"Meta-analysis in clinical trials","volume":"7","author":"DerSimonian","year":"1986","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.6383","article-title":"Statistical methods for meta-analyses including information from studies without any events\u2014add nothing to nothing and succeed nevertheless","volume":"34","author":"Kuss","year":"2015","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.2528","article-title":"Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events","volume":"26","author":"Bradburn","year":"2007","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3046","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4040","article-title":"Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data","volume":"29","author":"Stijnen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","article-title":"GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations","volume":"336","author":"Guyatt","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0b013e3181a819a1","article-title":"Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies","volume":"20","author":"Schisterman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib43","series-title":"The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses","author":"Wells","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib44","article-title":"ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions","volume":"355","author":"Sterne","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000023","article-title":"Methods of cervical ripening and labor induction: mechanical","volume":"57","author":"Sciscione","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.038","article-title":"Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"203","author":"Vaknin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3444-9","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes of induced labor in women with previous cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"291","author":"Rossi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.001","article-title":"Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"199","author":"Cahill","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293782600520X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S000293782600520X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,24]],"date-time":"2026-10-24T11:32:41Z","timestamp":1792841561000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S000293782600520X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"references-count":48,"alternative-id":["S000293782600520X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Transcervical balloon cervical ripening and risk of uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2026.09.037","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}