{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T23:51:34Z","timestamp":1762905094931,"version":"3.45.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,1]],"date-time":"2019-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1564617600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,1]],"date-time":"2019-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1564617600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004815","name":"Isaac Newton Trust","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004815","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Wellcome Trust ISSF"},{"name":"University of Cambridge Joint Research"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajogmfm.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,7]],"date-time":"2019-08-07T11:35:55Z","timestamp":1565177755000},"page":"100035","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Could masking gestational age estimation during scanning improve detection of small-for-gestational-age fetuses? A controlled pre\u2013post evaluation"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"1","author":[{"given":"Amanda","family":"Rowley","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ellen","family":"Dyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"James G.","family":"Scott","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Catherine E.","family":"Aiken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.039","article-title":"The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus","volume":"207","author":"Pilliod","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2009.1111","article-title":"Rates of and factors associated with delivery-related perinatal death among term infants in Scotland","volume":"302","author":"Pasupathy","year":"2009","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2011.01406.x","article-title":"Antenatal care, identification of suboptimal fetal growth and risk of late stillbirth: findings from the Auckland Stillbirth Study","volume":"52","author":"Stacey","year":"2012","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm.2010.027","article-title":"Avoidable mortality in small-for-gestational-age children in the Netherlands","volume":"38","author":"De Reu","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib5","first-page":"409","article-title":"Small for gestational age: the differential mortality when detected versus undetected antenatally","volume":"34","author":"Larkin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12902","article-title":"Introduction of a customised growth chart protocol increased detection of small for gestational age pregnancies in a tertiary Melbourne hospital","volume":"59","author":"Jayawardena","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"suppl2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S609","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.011","article-title":"Customized growth charts: rationale, validation and clinical benefits","volume":"218","author":"Gardosi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e241","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001815","article-title":"Practice Bulletin No. 175: ultrasound in pregnancy","volume":"128","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians","volume":"193","author":"Vayssiere","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1381","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13394","article-title":"Customized fetal growth standard compared with the INTERGROWTH-21st century standard at predicting small-for-gestational-age neonates","volume":"97","author":"Odibo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17393","article-title":"Prediction of fetal growth restriction using estimated fetal weight vs a combined screening model in the third trimester","volume":"50","author":"Miranda","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0164161","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0164161","article-title":"Single and serial fetal biometry to detect preterm and term small- and large-for-gestational-age neonates: a longitudinal cohort study","volume":"11","author":"Tarca","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15959","article-title":"Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval","volume":"49","author":"Reboul","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"suppl2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S630","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.011","article-title":"The INTERGROWTH-21(st) fetal growth standards: toward the global integration of pregnancy and pediatric care","volume":"218","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17514","article-title":"Prospective assessment of INTERGROWTH-21(st) and World Health Organization estimated fetal weight reference curves","volume":"51","author":"Cheng","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.931","article-title":"INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity","volume":"214","author":"Anderson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15919","article-title":"Differential performance of first-trimester screening in predicting small-for-gestational-age neonate or fetal growth restriction","volume":"49","author":"Crovetto","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12251","article-title":"Does the presence of risk factors for fetal growth restriction increase the probability of antenatal detection? A French National Study","volume":"30","author":"Monier","year":"2016","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3956(64)90003-2","article-title":"A\u00a0Longitudinal study of the effects of experimenter bias on the operant learning of laboratory rats","volume":"2","author":"Rosenthal","year":"1964","journal-title":"J\u00a0Psychiatr Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1111\/cob.12083","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial examining expectancy effects on the accuracy of weight measurement","volume":"5","author":"Dutton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Obes"},{"year":"2008","series-title":"Guideline CG62: antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib23"},{"year":"2010","series-title":"Guideline CG107: hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib24"},{"year":"2015","series-title":"Guideline NG3: diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib25"},{"journal-title":"Public Health England","article-title":"NHS Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme Handbook","year":"2018","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib26"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61490-2","article-title":"International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"384","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)60932-6","article-title":"International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"384","author":"Villar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14915","article-title":"Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs 32 weeks' gestation: a randomized trial (ROUTE)","volume":"46","author":"Roma","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14771","article-title":"Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30-34 weeks","volume":"45","author":"Bakalis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib31","unstructured":"R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: https:\/\/www.r-project.org\/. Accessed July 1, 2019."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.02.008","article-title":"Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes","volume":"218","author":"Madden","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.043","article-title":"Small-for-gestational-age infants among uncomplicated pregnancies at term: a secondary analysis of 9 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network studies","volume":"215","author":"Mendez-Figueroa","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933319300667?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933319300667?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T23:45:38Z","timestamp":1762904738000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2589933319300667"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S2589933319300667"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-9333"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2589-9333"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Could masking gestational age estimation during scanning improve detection of small-for-gestational-age fetuses? A controlled pre\u2013post evaluation","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100035","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"100035"}}