{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,24]],"date-time":"2026-10-24T05:11:09Z","timestamp":1792818669248,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,1]],"date-time":"2020-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1604188800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,1]],"date-time":"2020-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1604188800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajogmfm.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]],"date-time":"2020-08-17T13:16:09Z","timestamp":1597670169000},"page":"100193","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Prediction of delivery after 40 weeks by antepartum ultrasound in singleton nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"2","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5525-4353","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Giuseppe","family":"Rizzo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ilenia","family":"Mappa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Victoria","family":"Bitsadze","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giuseppe Maria","family":"Maruotti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexander","family":"Makatsariya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Francesco","family":"D\u2019Antonio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002838","article-title":"Risks of stillbirth and neonatal death with advancing gestation at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of 15 million pregnancies","volume":"16","author":"Muglu","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib2","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"5","author":"Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.046","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies","volume":"221","author":"Grobman","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002425","article-title":"Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: an English national cohort study","volume":"14","author":"Knight","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003743","article-title":"Delivery at 39 weeks of gestation: the time has come","volume":"135","author":"Ayala","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"590.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017","article-title":"Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"220","author":"Hersh","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10047.x","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality","volume":"105","author":"Hilder","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2232-8","article-title":"Derivation and validation of a model predicting the likelihood of vaginal birth following labour induction","volume":"19","author":"Alavifard","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2746","article-title":"Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"28","author":"Strobel","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13724","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasound cervical length for prediction of spontaneous labour at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"123","author":"Saccone","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70498-4","article-title":"Comparison of the Bishop score, ultrasonographically measured cervical length, and fetal fibronectin assay in predicting time until delivery and type of delivery at term","volume":"182","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-837268","article-title":"Prediction of spontaneous onset of labor at term: the role of cervical length measurement and funneling of internal cervical os detected by transvaginal ultrasonography","volume":"22","author":"Bayramoglu","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2015-0238","article-title":"Ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length in pregnancies scheduled for a cesarean delivery: prediction of early spontaneous onset of labor","volume":"44","author":"Rizzo","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1100","article-title":"The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor","volume":"24","author":"Rane","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib18","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of the cervix in predicting successful membrane sweeping: a prospective observational study","author":"Rizzo","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11195","article-title":"Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery?","volume":"40","author":"Levy","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5360","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor","volume":"32","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2744","article-title":"Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term","volume":"27","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20272","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth","volume":"53","author":"Salomon","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19072","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"52","author":"Ghi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1391","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12077","article-title":"Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery","volume":"39","author":"Cubal","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.165","article-title":"Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval","volume":"22","author":"Rane","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0929-8266(98)00042-1","article-title":"Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score","volume":"7","author":"Gonen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Eur J Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00017","article-title":"Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis","volume":"49","author":"Crane","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.130925","article-title":"Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"186","author":"Mishanina","year":"2014","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5291","article-title":"Sonographic longitudinal cervical length measurements in nulliparous women at term: prediction of spontaneous onset of labor","volume":"32","author":"Meijer-Hoogeveen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S258993332030149X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S258993332030149X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T23:47:21Z","timestamp":1762904841000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S258993332030149X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S258993332030149X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-9333"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-9333","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Prediction of delivery after 40 weeks by antepartum ultrasound in singleton nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100193","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"100193"}}