{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T03:29:33Z","timestamp":1792294173323,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajogmfm.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,19]],"date-time":"2020-10-19T06:13:49Z","timestamp":1603088029000},"page":"100249","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["Intrapartum ultrasound at the initiation of the active second stage of labor predicts spontaneous vaginal delivery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"3","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5347-4072","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Shira","family":"Hadad","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maya","family":"Oberman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alon","family":"Ben-Arie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Miri","family":"Sacagiu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Edi","family":"Vaisbuch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2626-7240","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Roni","family":"Levy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.044","article-title":"How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?","volume":"191","author":"Cheng","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.08.044","article-title":"Second-stage labor: consensus versus science","volume":"222","author":"Nelson","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001354","article-title":"Association of the duration of active pushing with obstetric outcomes","volume":"127","author":"Grobman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a722d6","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor","volume":"113","author":"Allen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2016.214","article-title":"Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cohort study","volume":"37","author":"Sandstr\u00f6m","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182639fae","article-title":"Immediate compared with delayed pushing in the second stage of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"120","author":"Tuuli","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1552-6909.2007.00205.x","article-title":"A\u00a0meta-analysis of passive descent versus immediate pushing in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia in the second stage of labor","volume":"37","author":"Brancato","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105197","article-title":"Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia. The PEOPLE (Pushing Early or Pushing Late with Epidural) Study Group","volume":"182","author":"Fraser","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1444","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.13986","article-title":"Effect of immediate vs delayed pushing on rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery among nulliparous women receiving neuraxial analgesia: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"320","author":"Cahill","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib10","first-page":"CD009124","article-title":"Pushing\/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour","volume":"3","author":"Lemos","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.02.002","article-title":"Delayed versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labor in women with neuraxial analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"223","author":"Di Mascio","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.028","article-title":"Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification","volume":"192","author":"Dupuis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.12.3.172.177","article-title":"Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position","volume":"12","author":"Akmal","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7504","article-title":"Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study","volume":"35","author":"Blasi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6329","article-title":"A\u00a0new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound","volume":"33","author":"Barbera","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6294","article-title":"Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the \u2018angle of progression\u2019 predict the mode of delivery?","volume":"33","author":"Kalache","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12422","article-title":"Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor","volume":"41","author":"Tutschek","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1439","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.12877","article-title":"Immediate vs delayed pushing during the second stage of labor","volume":"320","author":"Sperling","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19072","article-title":"ISUOG practice guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"52","author":"Ghi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d","article-title":"Obstetric Care Consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"123","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.08.002","article-title":"When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia","volume":"201","author":"Le Ray","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1333","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00282.x","article-title":"Delayed versus early pushing in women with epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"111","author":"Roberts","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e20","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001905","article-title":"Committee Opinion no. 687: approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth","volume":"129","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib24","series-title":"ACOG - Practice Advisory: immediate versus delayed pushing in nulliparous women receiving neuraxial analgesia","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e164","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003074","article-title":"Committee Opinion no. 766: approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth","volume":"133","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12335","article-title":"Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor","volume":"41","author":"Youssef","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.045","article-title":"Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"221","author":"Dall\u2019Asta","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13324","article-title":"Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery","volume":"44","author":"Ghi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0037-1608633","article-title":"Angle of progression on ultrasound in the second stage of labor and spontaneous vaginal delivery","volume":"35","author":"Bibbo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3848","article-title":"Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction","volume":"28","author":"Henrich","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib32","first-page":"1","article-title":"Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography","author":"Carvalho Neto","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12712","article-title":"Measuring angle of progression by transperineal ultrasonography to predict successful instrumental and cesarean deliveries during prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"144","author":"Chan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.05.040","article-title":"Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor","volume":"221","author":"Tse","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"592.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.236","article-title":"Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor","volume":"220","author":"Chaemsaithong","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15944","article-title":"Prediction of time to delivery by transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor","volume":"49","author":"Yonetani","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2744","article-title":"Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term","volume":"27","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8951","article-title":"Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor","volume":"37","author":"Torkildsen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14773","article-title":"Prediction of delivery mode by ultrasound-assessed fetal position in nulliparous women with prolonged first stage of labor","volume":"46","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"362.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.044","article-title":"A\u00a0model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"213","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14951","article-title":"Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure","volume":"48","author":"Bultez","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.03.009","article-title":"Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study","volume":"217","author":"Kahrs","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.007","article-title":"Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station","volume":"216","author":"Kasbaoui","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.035","article-title":"A\u00a0simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps","volume":"220","author":"Sainz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1159\/000455847","article-title":"The routine use of intrapartum ultrasound in clinical decision-making during the second stage of labor - does it have any impact on delivery outcomes?","volume":"83","author":"Barak","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7521","article-title":"Measurement of fetal head descent using the \u2018angle of progression\u2019 on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise","volume":"35","author":"D\u00fcckelmann","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7709","article-title":"What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent?","volume":"36","author":"Molina","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933320302172?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933320302172?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T23:48:35Z","timestamp":1762904915000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2589933320302172"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S2589933320302172"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-9333"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-9333","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Intrapartum ultrasound at the initiation of the active second stage of labor predicts spontaneous vaginal delivery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100249","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"100249"}}