{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T23:33:13Z","timestamp":1789169593417,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":113,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajogmfm.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,25]],"date-time":"2021-08-25T06:49:42Z","timestamp":1629874182000},"page":"100470","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"special_numbering":"S","title":["Mode of delivery in multiple pregnancies"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"4","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2741-3679","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Amir","family":"Aviram","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5470-2687","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jon F.R.","family":"Barrett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nir","family":"Melamed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4264-9495","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elad","family":"Mei-Dan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0001","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2019","volume":"70","author":"Martin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0002","unstructured":"Statistics Canada. Live births and fetal deaths (stillbirths), by type of birth (single or multiple). 2021. Available at:https:\/\/www150.statcan.gc.ca\/t1\/tbl1\/en\/tv.action?pid=1310042801. Accessed June 1st, 2021."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0003","unstructured":"Euro-Peristat Project. European Perinatal Health Report. Core indicators of the health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2015. 2018. Available at: www.europeristat.com. Acccessed June 1st, 2021."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0004","unstructured":"Statistics Netherland. 2020. Available at: https:\/\/www.cbs.nl\/en-gb. Accessed May 27, 2021."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0005","unstructured":"Australian Bureau of Statistics. Births, Australia. 2020. Available at: https:\/\/www.abs.gov.au\/statistics\/people\/population\/births-australia\/latest-release. Accessed May 27, 2021."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0006","series-title":"Birth characteristics in England and Wales Statistical bulletins","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0007","unstructured":"Central Bureau of Statistics.Israel. Live births\u2014Principal indicators. Available at: https:\/\/www.cbs.gov.il\/he\/pages\/default.aspx. Published June 1st, 2021. Accessed June 1, 2021."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e25239","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0025239","article-title":"Twinning across the developing world","volume":"6","author":"Smits","year":"2011","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.15585\/mmwr.ss6804a1","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2016","volume":"68","author":"Sunderam","year":"2019","journal-title":"MMWR Surveill Summ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.92.8.1323","article-title":"The impact of the increasing number of multiple births on the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight: an international study","volume":"92","author":"Blondel","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1053\/sper.2002.34775","article-title":"Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births","volume":"26","author":"Blondel","year":"2002","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-200304000-00005","article-title":"Outcome of triplets and high-order multiple pregnancies","volume":"15","author":"Blickstein","year":"2003","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0013","first-page":"685","article-title":"Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice","volume":"102","author":"Kahn","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i4353","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4353","article-title":"Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"354","author":"Cheong-See","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90201-8","article-title":"Randomized management of the second nonvertex twin: vaginal delivery or cesarean section","volume":"156","author":"Rabinovici","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02836.x","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"118","author":"Rossi","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1214939","article-title":"A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy","volume":"369","author":"Barrett","year":"2013","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21907","article-title":"Planned cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twins: secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial","volume":"57","author":"Zafarmand","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12387","article-title":"Planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for women in spontaneous labor with a twin pregnancy: a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study","volume":"46","author":"Mei-Dan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-1201-8","article-title":"The effect of induction method in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis for the twin birth study","volume":"17","author":"Mei-Dan","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03369-x","article-title":"Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study","volume":"20","author":"Dougan","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0022","article-title":"Twin Birth Study: 2-year neurodevelopmental follow-up of the randomized trial of planned cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy","volume":"214","author":"Asztalos","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1682","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15407","article-title":"Urinary stress incontinence and other maternal outcomes 2 years after caesarean or vaginal birth for twin pregnancy: a multicentre randomised trial","volume":"125","author":"Hutton","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002048","article-title":"Association between planned cesarean delivery and neonatal mortality and morbidity in twin pregnancies","volume":"129","author":"Schmitz","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/152.12.1107","article-title":"Mortality of twins and singletons by gestational age: a varying-coefficient approach","volume":"152","author":"Cheung","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0026","first-page":"638","article-title":"Prospective risk of stillbirth in multiple-gestation pregnancies: a population-based analysis","volume":"100","author":"Sairam","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-3016.2001.00361.x","article-title":"Perinatal mortality in twins and factors influencing mortality in Japan, 1980\u201398","volume":"15","author":"Imaizumi","year":"2001","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0028","first-page":"213","article-title":"A reappraisal of perinatal mortality factors in twins","volume":"31","author":"Puissant","year":"1982","journal-title":"Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1097\/01.gco.0000188409.62904.a3","article-title":"Should we deliver twins electively at 37 weeks\u2019 gestation?","volume":"17","author":"Dodd","year":"2005","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-6-3","article-title":"What is the optimal gestational age for twin delivery","volume":"6","author":"Bakr","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1731","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(03)00854-8","article-title":"Stillbirth and neonatal outcomes in South Australia, 1991-2000","volume":"189","author":"Dodd","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.109399","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity rates among twin pairs at different gestational ages: optimal delivery timing at 37 to 38 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"184","author":"Hartley","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2458-6-45","article-title":"Estimation of optimal birth weights and gestational ages for twin births in Japan","volume":"6","author":"Kato","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90628-V","article-title":"The ideal twin pregnancy: patterns of weight gain, discordancy, and length of gestation","volume":"169","author":"Luke","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03356.x","article-title":"Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial","volume":"119","author":"Dodd","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0036","article-title":"Elective birth at 37 weeks\u2019 gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy","author":"Dodd","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.003","article-title":"Risk of late-preterm stillbirth and neonatal morbidity for monochorionic and dichorionic twins","volume":"210","author":"Burgess","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e172","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020172","article-title":"High risk of unexpected late fetal death in monochorionic twins despite intensive ultrasound surveillance: a cohort study","volume":"2","author":"Barigye","year":"2005","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1318","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318292766b","article-title":"Increased stillbirth in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"121","author":"Danon","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823d7b06","article-title":"Optimum timing for planned delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies","volume":"119","author":"Breathnach","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000409","article-title":"Prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies","volume":"124","author":"Mieghem","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19179","article-title":"Inpatient vs outpatient management and timing of delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: the MONOMONO study","volume":"53","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0043","first-page":"e131","article-title":"Practice Bulletin No. 169: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies","volume":"128","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0044","article-title":"Twin and triplet pregnancy","year":"2019","journal-title":"NICE guideline 137"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0045","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Management of monochorionic twin pregnancy: Green-Top Guideline No. 51","volume":"124","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1692714","article-title":"Resident education in complex obstetric procedures: are we adequately preparing tomorrow's obstetricians?","volume":"37","author":"Dotters-Katz","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"Suppl1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34S","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001598","article-title":"Simulation to improve trainee knowledge and comfort about twin vaginal birth","volume":"128","author":"Easter","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.12.038","article-title":"Twin vaginal delivery: to maintain skill - simulation is required","volume":"234","author":"Lepage","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.05.020","article-title":"Simulation-based training of vaginal twin delivery for experienced gynaecologists: useful or not?","volume":"251","author":"Frenken","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0050","first-page":"160","article-title":"Intrapartum external version of the second twin","volume":"62","author":"Chervenak","year":"1983","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0051","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199203000-00019","article-title":"Selected intrapartum external cephalic version of the second twin","volume":"79","author":"Tchabo","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90245-7","article-title":"Management of the nonvertex second twin: primary cesarean section, external version, or primary breech extraction","volume":"161","author":"Gocke","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0053","first-page":"383","article-title":"Management of the nonvertex second twin","volume":"172","author":"Wells","year":"1991","journal-title":"Surg Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1015","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91319-X","article-title":"Delivery of the nonvertex second twin: breech extraction versus external cephalic version","volume":"173","author":"Chauhan","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0055","first-page":"146","article-title":"Method of delivery of the nonvertex second twin: a community hospital experience","volume":"6","author":"Smith","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0056","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.017","article-title":"Fetal presentation and successful twin vaginal delivery","volume":"214","author":"Easter","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0057","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1435","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003862","article-title":"Internal version compared with pushing for delivery of cephalic second twins","volume":"135","author":"Pauphilet","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0058","first-page":"428","article-title":"Internal podalic version with unruptured membranes for the second twin in transverse lie","volume":"71","author":"Rabinovici","year":"1988","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0059","first-page":"767","article-title":"Cesarean section for the second twin","volume":"42","author":"Kurzel","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.08.017","article-title":"Delivery of the second twin","volume":"91","author":"Ginsberg","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0061","first-page":"131","article-title":"Combined vaginal-abdominal delivery of twins","volume":"40","author":"Bider","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.927430","article-title":"Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twins: risk factors and neonatal outcome\u2013a single center experience","volume":"28","author":"Aviram","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0063","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.05.033","article-title":"Prediction of safe and successful vaginal twin birth","volume":"205","author":"Breathnach","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0064","first-page":"1032","article-title":"Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twin pregnancies","volume":"98","author":"Persad","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000110248.32558.fb","article-title":"Occurrence and predictors of cesarean delivery for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin","volume":"103","author":"Wen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0066","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318187ccb2","article-title":"Cesarean delivery for the second twin","volume":"112","author":"Alexander","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0067","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.06.047","article-title":"The worst of both worlds-combined deliveries in twin gestations: a subanalysis of the Twin Birth Study, a randomized, controlled, prospective study","volume":"221","author":"Aviram","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0068","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.10.047","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes according to actual delivery mode after planned vaginal delivery in women with a twin pregnancy","volume":"256","author":"Goossens","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0069","first-page":"502","article-title":"Multiple gestation: time interval between delivery of the first and second twins","volume":"63","author":"Rayburn","year":"1984","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1159\/000294840","article-title":"Time interval in twin delivery\u2013the second twin need not always be born shortly after the first","volume":"33","author":"Bartnicki","year":"1992","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0071","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-199203000-00001","article-title":"Delayed interval delivery in multiple pregnancies: report of three cases and review of the literature","volume":"47","author":"Poeschmann","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0072","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00631.x","article-title":"Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births","volume":"112","author":"Smith","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0073","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1375\/twin.14.6.573","article-title":"Twin-to-twin delivery time: neonatal outcome of the second twin","volume":"14","author":"Schneuber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Twin Res Hum Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0074","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12867","article-title":"Inter-twin delivery interval, short-term perinatal outcomes and risk of caesarean for the second twin","volume":"59","author":"Cukierman","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12790","article-title":"Impact of intertwin interval on short-term neonatal outcomes of the second twin in dichorionic pregnancies with vaginal delivery","volume":"145","author":"Benito","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0076","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00133.x","article-title":"Deterioration in cord blood gas status during the second stage of labour is more rapid in the second twin than in the first twin","volume":"111","author":"Leung","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0077","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12317","article-title":"Effect of inter-twin delivery interval on umbilical artery pH and Apgar score in the second twin","volume":"45","author":"Tal","year":"2018","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0078","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0079","first-page":"514","article-title":"Twins: collision, impaction, compaction, and interlocking","volume":"11","author":"Nissen","year":"1958","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1990.18.1.45","article-title":"Pregnancies with growth-retarded twins in breech-vertex presentation at increased risk for entanglement during delivery","volume":"18","author":"Rydhstr\u00f6m","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0081","first-page":"453","article-title":"Locked twins","volume":"39","author":"Khunda","year":"1972","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0082","first-page":"37","article-title":"Delivery of breech first twins: a multicenter retrospective study","volume":"95","author":"Blickstein","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0083","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2294-6","article-title":"Mode of delivery in non-cephalic presenting twins: a systematic review","volume":"286","author":"Steins Bisschop","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0084","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1015","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003785","article-title":"First twin in breech presentation and neonatal mortality and morbidity according to planned mode of delivery","volume":"135","author":"Korb","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1016\/S0849-5831(16)30135-5","article-title":"Management of twin pregnancies (Part I)","volume":"22","author":"Barrett","year":"2000","journal-title":"J SOGC"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0086","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05782-1","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and morbidity, timing and route of delivery in monoamniotic twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"303","author":"Chitrit","year":"2021","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0087","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2015-0401","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies delivered at late-preterm versus term gestation based on chorionicity and indication for delivery","volume":"44","author":"Sung","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0088","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01556.x","article-title":"Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study","volume":"115","author":"Hack","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0089","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.799657","article-title":"The effect of chorionicity and twin-to-twin delivery time interval on short-term outcome of the second twin","volume":"27","author":"Hjort\u00f8","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000227747.37184.0a","article-title":"Determinants of perinatal mortality and serious neonatal morbidity in the second twin","volume":"108","author":"Armson","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0091","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12558","article-title":"Intrapartum management of twin pregnancies: are uncomplicated monochorionic pregnancies more at risk of complications than dichorionic pregnancies?","volume":"94","author":"Garabedian","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0092","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"769","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2014-0072","article-title":"Adverse perinatal outcomes related to the delivery mode in women with monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies","volume":"42","author":"Yamashita","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0093","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10057","article-title":"Influence of chorionicity on perinatal outcome in a large cohort of Danish twin pregnancies","volume":"39","author":"Oldenburg","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0094","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00887.x","article-title":"Vaginal delivery can be considered in monochorionic diamniotic twins","volume":"113","author":"Sau","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.06.048","article-title":"Delivery of monochorionic twins: lessons learned from the Twin Birth Study","volume":"223","author":"Aviram","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0096","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"592","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23518","article-title":"Perinatal outcome after planned vaginal delivery in monochorionic compared with dichorionic twin pregnancy","volume":"57","author":"Schmitz","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0097","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.10.017","article-title":"Vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in preterm breech delivery: a systematic review","volume":"172","author":"Bergenhenegouwen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0098","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.03.002","article-title":"Morbidity and mortality associated with mode of delivery for breech periviable deliveries","volume":"213","author":"Tucker Edmonds","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0099","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.06.019","article-title":"Mortality and morbidity in early preterm breech singletons: impact of a policy of planned vaginal delivery","volume":"192","author":"Kayem","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1512","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01899.x","article-title":"Influence of mode of delivery on neonatal mortality in the second twin, at and before term","volume":"115","author":"Herbst","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.020","article-title":"Neonatal outcome of very preterm twins: policy of planned vaginal or cesarean delivery","volume":"213","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003004","article-title":"Planned mode of delivery of preterm twins and neonatal and 2-year outcomes","volume":"133","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.002","article-title":"Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in extremely preterm vertex\/nonvertex twins","volume":"224","author":"Hiersch","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1540579","article-title":"The impact of mode of delivery on the outcome in very preterm twins","volume":"33","author":"Mol","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1554-7","article-title":"What is the safest mode of delivery for extremely preterm cephalic\/non-cephalic twin pairs? A systematic review and meta-analyses","volume":"17","author":"Dagenais","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14938","article-title":"What is the safest mode of birth for extremely preterm breech singleton infants who are actively resuscitated? A systematic review and meta-analyses","volume":"125","author":"Grabovac","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1050","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.06.038","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies: is it safe?","volume":"193","author":"Cahill","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12434","article-title":"Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies after a previous cesarean delivery-a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"46","author":"Shinar","year":"2019","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.125","article-title":"Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"220","author":"Kabiri","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1133","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70119-X","article-title":"Preliminary experience with a prospective protocol for planned vaginal delivery of triplet gestations","volume":"179","author":"Alamia","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"942","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70193-0","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes in triplet gestations after a trial of labor","volume":"179","author":"Grobman","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.00516.x","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcome of 93 consecutive triplet pregnancies with 71% vaginal delivery","volume":"83","author":"Alran","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470_bib0113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.054","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations","volume":"215","author":"Lappen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933321001658?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933321001658?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,8]],"date-time":"2024-10-08T17:46:56Z","timestamp":1728409616000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2589933321001658"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"references-count":113,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S2589933321001658"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-9333"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-9333","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Mode of delivery in multiple pregnancies","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100470","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"100470"}}