{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,27]],"date-time":"2026-09-27T07:21:58Z","timestamp":1790493718221,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,29]],"date-time":"2022-11-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669680000000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":332,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajogmfm.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,8]],"date-time":"2021-11-08T12:00:18Z","timestamp":1636372818000},"page":"100527","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"4","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2755-7322","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Isabelle","family":"Monier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne","family":"Ego","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexandra","family":"Benachi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alice","family":"Hocquette","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9367-8317","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"B\u00e9atrice","family":"Blondel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fran\u00e7ois","family":"Goffinet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9568-2969","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jennifer","family":"Zeitlin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9","article-title":"ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction","volume":"121","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0002","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. 2013. Available at:https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/globalassets\/documents\/guidelines\/gtg_31.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2021."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians","volume":"193","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","article-title":"In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard","volume":"181","author":"Hadlock","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.032","article-title":"Racial\/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies","volume":"213","author":"Buck Louis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17347","article-title":"International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21 st Project","volume":"49","author":"Stirnemann","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.01.006","article-title":"[Chart for estimation of fetal weight 2014 by the French College of Fetal Sonography (CFEF)]","volume":"45","author":"Massoud","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.009","article-title":"[Customized and non-customized French intrauterine growth curves. I - Methodology]","volume":"45","author":"Ego","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2013.32.1.35","article-title":"Fetal sex and intrauterine growth patterns","volume":"32","author":"Melamed","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1002\/ajhb.21014","article-title":"Sex differences in fetal growth responses to maternal height and weight","volume":"22","author":"Lampl","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Hum Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1186\/s13293-019-0261-7","article-title":"Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population","volume":"10","author":"Galjaard","year":"2019","journal-title":"Biol Sex Differ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9006","article-title":"Influence of fetal and parental factors on intrauterine growth measurements: results of the EDEN mother-child cohort","volume":"38","author":"Albouy-Llaty","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0b013e3181f3a660","article-title":"Ultrasound pregnancy dating leads to biased perinatal morbidity and neonatal mortality among post-term-born girls","volume":"21","author":"Skalkidou","year":"2010","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12251","article-title":"Does the presence of risk factors for fetal growth restriction increase the probability of antenatal detection? A French national study","volume":"30","author":"Monier","year":"2016","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.002","article-title":"Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from 1995 to 2016: results from the French National Perinatal Surveys","volume":"46","author":"Blondel","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.01.026","article-title":"Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"169","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0017","series-title":"Rapport du Comit\u00e9 National Technique de l'Echographie de D\u00e9pistage Pr\u00e9natal. L\u2019\u00e9chographie de diagnostic","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0018","first-page":"61","article-title":"[Fetal growth from the AUDIPOG study. I. Establishment of reference curves]","volume":"25","author":"Mamelle","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22000","article-title":"Intergrowth-21st standards for Hadlock's estimation of fetal weight","volume":"56","author":"Stirnemann","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0020","article-title":"The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight","volume":"14","author":"Kiserud","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.966","article-title":"Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15-40 weeks of gestation","volume":"23","author":"Schw\u00e4rzler","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3768","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1149565","article-title":"The effect of fetal sex on customized fetal growth charts","volume":"29","author":"Rizzo","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.942","article-title":"Sex-specific fetal weight prediction by ultrasound","volume":"23","author":"Schild","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1159\/000159777","article-title":"Increased accuracy of fetal weight estimation with a gender-specific weight formula","volume":"24","author":"Siemer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14164.x","article-title":"Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights","volume":"85","author":"Mars\u00e1l","year":"1996","journal-title":"Acta Paediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340600569133","article-title":"Longitudinal reference ranges for estimated fetal weight","volume":"85","author":"Johnsen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4019","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36 weeks\u2019 gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range","volume":"29","author":"Salomon","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0569-1","article-title":"Unconditional and conditional standards for fetal abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight in an ethnic Chinese population: a birth cohort study","volume":"15","author":"Xu","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1993.03060395.x","article-title":"Biometric measurements in fetuses of different race and gender","volume":"3","author":"Bromley","year":"1993","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1159\/000484555","article-title":"Gender-specific antenatal growth reference charts in monochorionic twins","volume":"44","author":"Torres","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.61.6.559","article-title":"Prognosis of the very low birthweight baby in relation to gender","volume":"61","author":"Brothwood","year":"1986","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0032","first-page":"1322","article-title":"Fetal sex and indicated very preterm birth: results of the EPIPAGE study","volume":"190","author":"Zeitlin","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/S1550-8579(07)80004-0","article-title":"Does fetal sex affect pregnancy outcome?","volume":"4","author":"Di Renzo","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gend Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.053","article-title":"Is fetal gender associated with adverse perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR)?","volume":"193","author":"Qui\u00f1ones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1162","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2015.2175","article-title":"Prognostic factors for poor cognitive development in children born very preterm or with very low birth weight: a systematic review","volume":"169","author":"Linsell","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13148","article-title":"Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study","volume":"122","author":"Monier","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20414","article-title":"Antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and risk of stillbirth: population-based case-control study","volume":"55","author":"Ego","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1806","article-title":"Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?","volume":"25","author":"Lindqvist","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.1998.770611.x","article-title":"Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases","volume":"77","author":"Jahn","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.043","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"220","author":"Caradeux","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S641","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.593","article-title":"Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study","volume":"218","author":"Grantz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"f108","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f108","article-title":"Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study","volume":"346","author":"Gardosi","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.600793","article-title":"Suspected versus non-suspected small-for-gestational age fetuses at term: perinatal outcomes","volume":"25","author":"Verlijsdonk","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2011.01406.x","article-title":"Antenatal care, identification of suboptimal fetal growth and risk of late stillbirth: findings from the Auckland Stillbirth Study","volume":"52","author":"Stacey","year":"2012","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.004","article-title":"Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy","volume":"218","author":"Mccowan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527_bib0046","unstructured":"Gardosi J, Williams A, Hugh O, Francis A. GROW documentation. 2019. Available at:https:\/\/www.gestation.net\/GROW_documentation.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2021."}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933321002238?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933321002238?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T23:48:13Z","timestamp":1762904893000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2589933321002238"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S2589933321002238"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-9333"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-9333","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100527","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"100527"}}