{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T16:31:32Z","timestamp":1786984292422,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,1]],"date-time":"2022-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1656633600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,26]],"date-time":"2022-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653523200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100018565","name":"Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100018565","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajogmfm.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,28]],"date-time":"2022-03-28T21:02:01Z","timestamp":1648501321000},"page":"100628","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["A randomized trial of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator for induction of labor vs dinoprostone vaginal insert"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"4","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3052-8423","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Janesh K.","family":"Gupta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9738-2935","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alisha","family":"Maher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2690-6583","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Clive","family":"Stubbs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9950-6751","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Peter","family":"Brocklehurst","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3324-6771","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jane P.","family":"Daniels","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2937-8368","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pollyanna","family":"Hardy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0001","unstructured":"NHS Digital. NHS maternity statistics 2017-18. 2018. Available at: https:\/\/digital.nhs.uk\/data-and-information\/publications\/statistical\/nhs-maternity-statistics\/2017-18. Accessed November 25, 2021."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-11-84","article-title":"Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review","volume":"11","author":"Mozurkewich","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12846","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E\u2082 (OPRA study)","volume":"122","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"803","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14186","article-title":"Induction of labour: many choices, but still in search of the perfect protocol","volume":"124","author":"Robinson","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14147","article-title":"Induction of labour with retrievable prostaglandin vaginal inserts: outcomes following retrieval due to an intrapartum adverse event","volume":"124","author":"Rugarn","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1111\/tog.12395","article-title":"An overview of the past, current and future trends for cervical ripening in induction of labour","volume":"19","author":"Chodankar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.08.004","article-title":"Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour-an international multicentre observational study","volume":"229","author":"Gupta","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0008","first-page":"3","article-title":"A comparison of three preinduction cervical priming methods: prostaglandin E2 gel, Dilapan S rods and estradiol gel","volume":"63","author":"Roztocil","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ceska Gynekol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.008","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial)","volume":"220","author":"Saad","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0010","series-title":"ACOG Annual Scientific Meeting (Poster presentation); April 30","article-title":"Randomised controlled trial Comparing Cervical Ripening Efficacy of dilapan-S to Oral misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term (COMRED study)","author":"Gavara","year":"2021"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.05.020","article-title":"A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter","volume":"207","author":"Cromi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1280","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000238","article-title":"Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Edwards","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0013","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"3","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0014","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"10","author":"de Vaan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.07.020","article-title":"Adverse intrapartum outcome in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age and late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with dinoprostone, misoprostol or mechanical methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"252","author":"Familiari","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0016","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Inducing labour. Clinical Guideline. 2021. Available at: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng207. Accessed November 25, 2021."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"410","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14037","article-title":"Experiences of induction of labor with a catheter - a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the outpatient and inpatient setting","volume":"100","author":"Haavisto","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004382","article-title":"Outpatient cervical ripening: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"137","author":"McDonagh","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.02.007","article-title":"Vaginal prostaglandin E 2 versus double-balloon catheter for induction of labour for vaginal birth after caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"259","author":"Bullough","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0020","article-title":"Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes","volume":"8","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-14-330","article-title":"Women's preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment","volume":"14","author":"Howard","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0022","article-title":"Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings","volume":"9","author":"Vogel","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1593","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)01042-9","article-title":"Oral misoprostol is as safe as Foley catheter for labour induction\u2026or is it?","volume":"387","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100702","type":"erratum","label":"Erratum","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000}}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933322000702?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933322000702?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,26]],"date-time":"2022-07-26T17:40:28Z","timestamp":1658857228000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2589933322000702"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S2589933322000702"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-9333"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-9333","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A randomized trial of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator for induction of labor vs dinoprostone vaginal insert","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100628","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Crown Copyright \u00a9 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"100628"}}