{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T22:12:07Z","timestamp":1783462327615,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":56,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajogmfm.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,20]],"date-time":"2022-12-20T02:43:38Z","timestamp":1671504218000},"page":"100839","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Obstetrical provider preferences for cesarean delivery on maternal request in uncomplicated pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"5","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9718-8032","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tanvi","family":"Rana","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Syona","family":"Satwah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Federica","family":"Bellussi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vincenzo","family":"Berghella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31928-7","article-title":"Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections","volume":"392","author":"Boerma","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d","article-title":"Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"123","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e73","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003006","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion No. 761: cesarean delivery on maternal request","volume":"133","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.01.043","article-title":"Cesarean delivery on maternal request in China: what are the risks and benefits?","volume":"212","author":"Liu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16491","article-title":"Global incidence of caesarean deliveries on maternal request: a systematic review and meta-regression","volume":"128","author":"Begum","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(96)02692-9","article-title":"Survey of obstetricians\u2019 personal preference and discretionary practice","volume":"73","author":"Al-Mufti","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1177","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)79120-0","article-title":"Do doctors have an increased rate of caesarean section?","volume":"351","author":"Geary","year":"1998","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00468-7","article-title":"Temporal and geographical variation in UK obstetricians\u2019 personal preference regarding mode of delivery","volume":"100","author":"Groom","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2001.tb01224.x","article-title":"Personal preferences of obstetricians towards childbirth","volume":"41","author":"Land","year":"2001","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1080\/0144361021000020312","article-title":"Scottish female obstetricians\u2019 views on elective caesarean section and personal choice for delivery","volume":"22","author":"MacDonald","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)71484-7","article-title":"Obstetricians\u2019 choice of delivery","volume":"357","author":"Gabbe","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00425-0","article-title":"A survey of trainee obstetricians preferences for childbirth","volume":"97","author":"Wright","year":"2001","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.0312.x","article-title":"Danish obstetricians\u2019 personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey","volume":"83","author":"Bergholt","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00423-7","article-title":"A national confidential survey of obstetrician's personal preferences regarding mode of delivery","volume":"97","author":"Mc Gurgan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(02)07733-4","article-title":"Norwegian obstetricians prefer vaginal route of delivery","volume":"359","author":"Backe","year":"2002","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-005-1324-3","article-title":"The choice of elective cesarean delivery in obstetrics: a voluntary survey of Canadian health care professionals","volume":"16","author":"Farrell","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0017","first-page":"577","article-title":"Obstetricians\u2019 opinions regarding patient choice in cesarean delivery","volume":"99","author":"Gonen","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00214-8","article-title":"Flemish obstetricians\u2019 personal preference regarding mode of delivery and attitude towards caesarean section on demand","volume":"111","author":"Jacquemyn","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.01.016","article-title":"Caesarean section on demand: influence of personal birth experience and working environment on attitude of German gynaecologists","volume":"122","author":"Faas-Fehervary","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2008.07.006","article-title":"Cesarean delivery on maternal request: the impact on mother and newborn","volume":"35","author":"Lee","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000151110.05801.c0","article-title":"Elective primary cesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists","volume":"105","author":"Wu","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2005.370_1.x","article-title":"Patient choice cesarean\u2013the Maine experience","volume":"32","author":"Wax","year":"2005","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2008.04.006","article-title":"Attitudes towards mode of birth among Swedish midwives","volume":"26","author":"Gunnervik","year":"2008","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.05.031","article-title":"Attitudes towards mode of delivery and cesarean on demand in Turkey","volume":"99","author":"Koken","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000249608.11864.b6","article-title":"Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists\u2019 knowledge, perception, and practice patterns","volume":"109","author":"Bettes","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340902842444","article-title":"Jordanian obstetricians\u2019 personal preference regarding mode of delivery","volume":"88","author":"Lataifeh","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1494","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01892.x","article-title":"Vaginal delivery compared with elective caesarean section: the views of pregnant women and clinicians","volume":"115","author":"Turner","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-010-1682-z","article-title":"Turkish obstetricians\u2019 personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request","volume":"284","author":"Arikan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.12891\/ceog3272.2017","article-title":"Cesarean section: requested mode of delivery?","volume":"44","author":"Celik","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.07.005","article-title":"Personal birth preferences and actual mode of delivery outcomes of obstetricians and gynaecologists in South West England; with comparison to regional and national birth statistics","volume":"181","author":"Lightly","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2016.04.002","article-title":"Mode of delivery among Swedish midwives and obstetricians and their attitudes towards caesarean section","volume":"11","author":"Sahlin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Sex Reprod Healthc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0032","first-page":"44","article-title":"Family physicians\u2019 views on caesarean delivery on maternal request","volume":"4","author":"Kurtoglu","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Anal Med"},{"issue":"Suppl2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0033","first-page":"S84","article-title":"Self-preferred route of delivery of Thai obstetricians and gynecologists","volume":"99","author":"Kovavisarach","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.12891\/ceog3404.2016","article-title":"Flemish obstetricians\u2019 personal preference regarding induction of labor and mode of delivery in term births","volume":"43","author":"Sonnemans","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0035","first-page":"507","article-title":"Obstetricians agree with legalizing the C-section","volume":"50","author":"Dimitriu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Archives of the Balkan Medical Union"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1294","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15122","article-title":"Obstetrical providers\u2019 preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study","volume":"125","author":"Rivo","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2017.1345874","article-title":"UK O&G trainees\u2019 attitudes to caesarean delivery for maternal request","volume":"38","author":"Aref-Adib","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.13168","article-title":"The attitudes and beliefs of Australian midwives and obstetricians about birth options and labor interventions","volume":"66","author":"Coates","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.30699\/jogcr.6.4.209","article-title":"Tendency toward cesarean on maternal request in fear of sexual dysfunction","volume":"6","author":"Hadadianpour","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.021","article-title":"Toward normal birth-but at what cost?","volume":"215","author":"Dietz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0041","article-title":"Twin Birth Study: 2-year neurodevelopmental follow-up of the randomized trial of planned cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy","volume":"214","author":"Asztalos","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16452","article-title":"Caesarean section in the second delivery to prevent anal incontinence after asymptomatic obstetric anal sphincter injury: the EPIC multicentre randomised trial","volume":"128","author":"Abramowitz","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1214939","article-title":"A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy","volume":"369","author":"Barrett","year":"2013","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(80)90780-2","article-title":"The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: a study of 208 cases","volume":"137","author":"Collea","year":"1980","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001192","article-title":"Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial","volume":"9","author":"Crowther","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)90923-7","article-title":"Randomized management of the nonfrank breech presentation at term: a preliminary report","volume":"146","author":"Gimovsky","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.08.004","article-title":"Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial","volume":"191","author":"Hannah","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1653","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13597","article-title":"Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"122","author":"Hutton","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0050","first-page":"212","article-title":"The effect of delivery on umbilical arterial cord blood gases and lipid peroxides: comparison of vaginal delivery and cesarean section","volume":"29","author":"Pence","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0051","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90201-8","article-title":"Randomized management of the second nonvertex twin: vaginal delivery or cesarean section","volume":"156","author":"Rabinovici","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0052","first-page":"364","article-title":"Comparison of emergency caesarean section to misoprostol induction for the delivery of antepartum eclamptic patients: a pilot study","volume":"16","author":"Tukur","year":"2007","journal-title":"Niger J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.056","article-title":"Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial","volume":"191","author":"Whyte","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994704","article-title":"The Iowa premature breech trial","volume":"10","author":"Zlatnik","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1822","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.14.1822","article-title":"Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial","volume":"287","author":"Hannah","year":"2002","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839_bib0056","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries","volume":"107","author":"Silver","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933322002695?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933322002695?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T23:52:03Z","timestamp":1762905123000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2589933322002695"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"references-count":56,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S2589933322002695"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-9333"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-9333","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Obstetrical provider preferences for cesarean delivery on maternal request in uncomplicated pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100839","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"100839"}}