{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,27]],"date-time":"2026-03-27T04:18:36Z","timestamp":1774585116209,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,1]],"date-time":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1677628800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,1]],"date-time":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1677628800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajogmfm.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,19]],"date-time":"2023-01-19T17:55:10Z","timestamp":1674150910000},"page":"100869","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Is bigger better? A comparison of growth restriction rates using the crown-rump length derived due date from the smaller versus larger twin"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Tracey H.","family":"DeYoung","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sharon K.","family":"Stortz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Robert H.","family":"Riffenburgh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Monica A.","family":"Lutgendorf","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5545-7361","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrew S.","family":"Thagard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1966","article-title":"Growth discrepancy in twins in the first trimester of pregnancy","volume":"26","author":"Salomon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2012.02054.x","article-title":"Determination of gestational age in twin pregnancy: which fetal crown-rump length should be used?","volume":"39","author":"Chaudhuri","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2319","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.15615","article-title":"Establishing the most accurate due date in dichorionic twin gestations by first and second trimester ultrasound","volume":"40","author":"DeYoung","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e150","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002046","article-title":"Methods for estimating the due date. Committee Opinion No. 700","volume":"129","author":"Pettker","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e145","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004397","article-title":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Obstetrics, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 231","volume":"137","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15821","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy","volume":"47","author":"Khalil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0007","series-title":"Multiple pregnancy: the management of twin and triplet pregnancies in the antenatal period","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.05.010","article-title":"Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (Replaces Clinical Guideline Number 3, April 2012)","volume":"223","author":"Martins","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.02.008","article-title":"Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes","volume":"218","author":"Madden","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.182.2.1732970","article-title":"Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US","volume":"182","author":"Hadlock","year":"1992","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"612","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6128","article-title":"First-trimester screening in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: significance of gestational dating by oocyte retrieval or sonographic measurement of crown-rump length","volume":"32","author":"Gjerris","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00004.x","article-title":"Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown-rump length and biparietal diameter","volume":"15","author":"Tun\u00f3n","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0231028","article-title":"The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies","volume":"15","author":"Seravalli","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.05.035","article-title":"Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses","volume":"146","author":"McDonald","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.12030170.x","article-title":"Gestational age in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: comparison between ultrasound measurement and actual age","volume":"12","author":"Wennerholm","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10952","DOI":"10.18632\/aging.102497","article-title":"Global, regional, and national prevalence and disability-adjusted life-years for infertility in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: results from a global burden of disease study, 2017","volume":"11","author":"Sun","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aging (Albany NY)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869_bib0017","first-page":"109","article-title":"Disparities in access to fertility care: who's in and who's out","volume":"2","author":"Galic","year":"2021","journal-title":"F S Rep"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933323000113?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933323000113?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T23:51:06Z","timestamp":1762905066000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2589933323000113"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S2589933323000113"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-9333"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-9333","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Is bigger better? A comparison of growth restriction rates using the crown-rump length derived due date from the smaller versus larger twin","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.100869","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"100869"}}