{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,2]],"date-time":"2026-11-02T21:10:13Z","timestamp":1793653813322,"version":"4.5.1"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,1]],"date-time":"2024-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1725148800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,1]],"date-time":"2024-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1725148800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,1]],"date-time":"2024-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1725148800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,1]],"date-time":"2024-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1725148800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,1]],"date-time":"2024-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1725148800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,1]],"date-time":"2024-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1725148800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,1]],"date-time":"2024-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1725148800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajogmfm.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,2]],"date-time":"2024-08-02T10:02:44Z","timestamp":1722592964000},"page":"101436","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Vaginal dinoprostone vs Foley catheter for induction of labor at term with an unfavorable cervix: an open-label randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"6","author":[{"given":"Xiaohua","family":"Liu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ding","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yang","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cuicui","family":"Qu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Huiqin","family":"Mo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xin","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wentao","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ben Willem","family":"Mol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hong","family":"Shen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Weiwei","family":"Cheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6098-7017","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hao","family":"Ying","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0001","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2014","volume":"64","author":"Hamilton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0002","series-title":"NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2021-22","article-title":"Population health, clinical audit and specialist care team, NHS digital","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0003","first-page":"177","article-title":"Cervical ripening and induction of labor","volume":"105","author":"Wheeler","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2095","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"378","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.05.020","article-title":"A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter","volume":"207","author":"Cromi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.029","article-title":"Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study","volume":"204","author":"Cromi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2013-0152","article-title":"Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone","volume":"42","author":"Suffecool","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2382","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1086331","article-title":"Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Wang","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0009","first-page":"D1233","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"10","author":"de Vaan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1681","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)01845-1","article-title":"Balloon catheters versus vaginal prostaglandins for labour induction (CPI Collaborative): an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","volume":"400","author":"Jones","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S669","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.02.009","article-title":"Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety","volume":"230","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0012","unstructured":"Xie X, Kong B, Tao D. Obstetrics and gynecology. Peoples Medical Publishing House; 2018, pp.138\u2013140, pp.179\u2013181."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0013","first-page":"721","article-title":"The expert consensus on cesarean delivery operation (2014)","volume":"49","year":"2014","journal-title":"Chin J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0014","first-page":"561","article-title":"Chinese experts consensus on prevention of perinatal group B Streptococcal disease","volume":"24","year":"2021","journal-title":"Chin J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0015","first-page":"721","article-title":"Timing of delivery for pregnancies with comorbidities and complications: expert consensus","volume":"23","year":"2020","journal-title":"Chin J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31927-5","article-title":"Interventions to reduce unnecessary Cesarean sections in healthy women and babies","volume":"392","author":"Betran","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1619","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00084-2","article-title":"Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial","volume":"387","author":"Ten","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x","article-title":"Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel","volume":"116","author":"Pennell","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2015.1011101","article-title":"Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone","volume":"35","author":"Lokkegaard","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2014.173","article-title":"Intra-vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for labor induction in term oligohydramnios","volume":"35","author":"Shechter-Maor","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001002","article-title":"Evaluation of a transcervical Foley catheter as a source of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"126","author":"Mcmaster","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1280","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000238","article-title":"Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Edwards","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1357","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001778","article-title":"Mechanical and pharmacologic methods of labor induction: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"128","author":"Levine","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1027","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06383-2","article-title":"Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial","volume":"306","author":"Vallikkannu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13456","article-title":"A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour","volume":"123","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1475","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06071-1","article-title":"Intracervical double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation","volume":"304","author":"Canadas","year":"2021","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933324001629?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933324001629?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,18]],"date-time":"2024-09-18T23:08:11Z","timestamp":1726700891000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2589933324001629"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S2589933324001629"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-9333"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-9333","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Vaginal dinoprostone vs Foley catheter for induction of labor at term with an unfavorable cervix: an open-label randomized controlled trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101436","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"101436"}}