{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,13]],"date-time":"2026-11-13T23:43:05Z","timestamp":1794613385322,"version":"4.9.1"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004386","name":"University of Malaya","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004386","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajogmfm.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology MFM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,12]],"date-time":"2024-12-12T12:37:14Z","timestamp":1734007034000},"page":"101579","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Tugging the Foley catheter balloon every three hours in induction of labor after one previous cesarean: a randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Krishnan","family":"Yunesh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aizura Syafinaz Ahmad","family":"Adlan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thai Ying","family":"Wong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Farah","family":"Gan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mukhri","family":"Hamdan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8713-6581","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Peng Chiong","family":"Tan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","article-title":"Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates","volume":"6","author":"Betran","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0002","unstructured":"NHS maternity statistics, England; 2020\u201321. NHS England. 2021. Available at:https:\/\/digital.nhs.uk\/data-and-information\/publications\/statistical\/nhs-maternity-statistics\/2020-21. Accessed January 27, 2023."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2006.00675.x","article-title":"Labour and perinatal outcome in women at term with one previous lower-segment caesarean: a review of 1000 consecutive cases","volume":"47","author":"Tan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0237132","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: a French retrospective study","volume":"15","author":"Vecchioli","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14364","article-title":"Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: a randomized trial","volume":"160","author":"Sulaiman","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.101158","article-title":"Induction of labor via Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unfavorable cervices: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"5","author":"Yogamoorthy","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13712","article-title":"Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"99","author":"Sarreau","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14166","article-title":"Adjunctive membrane sweeping in Foley catheter induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: a randomized trial","volume":"160","author":"Hong","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003079","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 205 summary: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"133","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"345","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1681","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)01845-1","article-title":"Balloon catheters versus vaginal prostaglandins for labour induction (CPI Collaborative): an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","volume":"400","author":"Jones","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0012","series-title":"WHO recommendations on mechanical methods ofor induction of labour","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13558","article-title":"Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix","volume":"98","author":"Huisman","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06298-y","article-title":"Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix: a multicenter, retrospective study","volume":"306","author":"Secchi","year":"2022","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.4038\/cmj.v66i2.9468","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for 48 hours versus a supra cervical Foley catheter for 48 hours for induction of labour in post dated pregnancies: a randomized control trial","volume":"66","author":"Amarasena","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ceylon Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.2307\/3583262","article-title":"Cervical ripening: how long can the Foley catheter safely remain in the cervical canal?","volume":"6","author":"Ekele","year":"2002","journal-title":"Afr J Reprod Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0136856","article-title":"Foley catheter for induction of labor at term: an open-label, randomized controlled trial","volume":"10","author":"Gu","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.029","article-title":"Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study","volume":"204","author":"Cromi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003804","article-title":"Double-balloon device for 6 compared with 12 hours for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"135","author":"Bleicher","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0020","first-page":"611","article-title":"Six versus twelve hours of single-balloon catheter placement with oxytocin administration for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"224","author":"Lassey","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.101157","article-title":"Six compared with 12 hours of Foley balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervices: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"5","author":"Appadurai","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2023.101142","article-title":"Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"5","author":"Kamarudzman","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1673","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15397","article-title":"Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study","volume":"125","author":"Dos Santos","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1675642","article-title":"Assessing maternal and fetal risks associated with prolonged induction of labor","volume":"36","author":"Triebwasser","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14848","article-title":"Predictors of maternal satisfaction with labor induction: a prospective observational cohort study","volume":"163","author":"Ramlee","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1086","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15047","article-title":"Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review","volume":"125","author":"Diederen","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14313","article-title":"Early versus delayed amniotomy with immediate oxytocin after Foley catheter cervical ripening in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized trial","volume":"159","author":"Hasan","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14361","article-title":"Early versus delayed amniotomy with immediate oxytocin after Foley catheter cervical ripening in multiparous women with labor induction: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"160","author":"Jamaluddin","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827e7fd9","article-title":"Immediate compared with delayed oxytocin after amniotomy labor induction in parous women: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"121","author":"Tan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.15157","article-title":"Digital insertion of Foley catheter 16F versus 22F versus 28F in unripe cervix labor induction: a randomized trial","volume":"48","author":"Lim","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03029-0","article-title":"Speculum versus digital insertion of Foley catheter for induction of labor in Nulliparas with unripe cervix: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"20","author":"Chia","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1051","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13353","article-title":"Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"97","author":"Schoen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100610","article-title":"Traction vs no traction in Foley catheter use for induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"4","author":"Schoen","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.001","article-title":"Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"199","author":"Cahill","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1236","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.316.7139.1236","article-title":"What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments","volume":"316","author":"Perneger","year":"1998","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.09.082","article-title":"Tension compared to no tension on a Foley transcervical catheter for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"216","author":"Fruhman","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1177\/0049475515626031","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing 30 mL and 80 mL in Foley catheter for induction of labour after previous Caesarean section","volume":"46","author":"Manish","year":"2016","journal-title":"Trop Doct"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study","volume":"117","author":"Dekker","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology MFM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933324003057?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933324003057?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,8]],"date-time":"2025-11-08T20:17:38Z","timestamp":1762633058000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2589933324003057"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S2589933324003057"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-9333"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-9333","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Tugging the Foley catheter balloon every three hours in induction of labor after one previous cesarean: a randomized controlled trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101579","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"101579"}}