{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,10]],"date-time":"2026-11-10T18:46:20Z","timestamp":1794336380053,"version":"4.9.0"},"reference-count":63,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1762819200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000272","name":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000272","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100023262","name":"The Jon Moulton Charity Trust","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100023262","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajogmfm.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,8]],"date-time":"2025-11-08T23:47:34Z","timestamp":1762645654000},"page":"101839","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["A systematic review of transvaginal ultrasound assessment of cesarean scar characteristics and prediction of adverse obstetric outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"8","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0456-0828","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Amrita","family":"Banerjee","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roberta","family":"Solda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria","family":"Ivan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charlotte","family":"Colley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Davor","family":"Jurkovic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna L.","family":"David","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Raffaele","family":"Napolitano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","article-title":"Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates","volume":"6","author":"Betran","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31930-5","article-title":"Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children","volume":"392","author":"Sandall","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.03.008","article-title":"Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend","volume":"157","author":"Unterscheider","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.03.031","article-title":"Exploring full cervical dilatation caesarean sections\u2013a retrospective cohort study","volume":"224","author":"Corry","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1111\/tog.12112","article-title":"Caesarean section at full dilatation: incidence, impact and current management","volume":"16","author":"Vousden","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Obstetric Gynaecologist"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12236","article-title":"A cross-sectional study exploring the incidence of and indications for second-stage cesarean delivery over three decades","volume":"138","author":"Pearson","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00615.x","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour","volume":"112","author":"Allen","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.08.025","article-title":"Comparison of maternal outcomes from primary cesarean section during the second compared with first stage of labor by indication for the operation","volume":"182","author":"Lurie","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe","article-title":"Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor","volume":"109","author":"Alexander","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-007-0548-5","article-title":"Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity","volume":"278","author":"Selo-Ojeme","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.03.006","article-title":"Cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the risk of subsequent premature birth","volume":"217","author":"Wood","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12713","article-title":"Does previous caesarean section at full dilatation increase the likelihood of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth?","volume":"58","author":"Cong","year":"2018","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13058","article-title":"Risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy following caesarean section at full cervical dilatation compared with mid-cavity instrumental delivery","volume":"60","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.09.035","article-title":"Does stage of labor at time of cesarean delivery affect risk of subsequent preterm birth?","volume":"212","author":"Levine","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1020","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16566","article-title":"Caesarean birth and risk of subsequent preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"128","author":"Williams","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14186","article-title":"Second stage cesarean section and the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies","volume":"159","author":"Offringa","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.08.013","article-title":"Risk of spontaneous preterm birth elevated after first caesarean delivery at full dilatation: a retrospective cohort study of over 30,000 women","volume":"230","author":"Woolner","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1100","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13160","article-title":"Full dilation cesarean section: a risk factor for recurrent second-trimester loss and preterm birth","volume":"96","author":"Watson","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2023.102390","article-title":"The definition, diagnosis, and symptoms of the uterine niche - a systematic review","volume":"90","author":"Klein Meuleman","year":"2023","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.06.030","article-title":"Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: a systematic review on expectant management","volume":"288","author":"Silva","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14509","article-title":"Cesarean scar niche: an evolving concern in clinical practice","volume":"161","author":"Armstrong","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19049","article-title":"Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure","volume":"53","author":"Jordans","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13199","article-title":"Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review","volume":"43","author":"Bij de Vaate","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26027","article-title":"Reproducibility of assessment of full-dilatation Cesarean section scar in women undergoing second-trimester screening for preterm birth","volume":"60","author":"Banerjee","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1304829","article-title":"Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect","volume":"29","author":"Roberge","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2010.02.007","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"8","author":"Moher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l4898","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898","article-title":"RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0028","unstructured":"Wells G, Shea B, O\u2019Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses; 2000. https:\/\/www.ohri.ca\/programs\/clinical_epidemiology\/oxford.asp. Accessed March 24, 2024."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101298","article-title":"Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in women with previous full dilatation cesarean delivery","volume":"6","author":"Banerjee","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23734","article-title":"Lower uterine segment scar assessment at 11\u201314\u2009weeks\u2019 gestation to screen for placenta accreta spectrum in women with prior Cesarean delivery","volume":"59","author":"Bhatia","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina58030407","article-title":"Cesarean scar thickness decreases during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study","volume":"58","author":"Savukyne","year":"2022","journal-title":"Medicina (Kaunas)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina57101091","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of Cesarean section scar niche in pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study","volume":"57","author":"Savukyne","year":"2021","journal-title":"Medicina (Kaunas)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100183","article-title":"Early prediction of placenta accreta spectrum in women with prior cesarean delivery using transvaginal ultrasound at 11 to 14 weeks","volume":"2","author":"Doulaveris","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.18565\/aig.2020.10.99-104","article-title":"Ultrasound examination of the cesarean scar in the prognosis of pregnancy outcome","author":"Zemskova","year":"2020","journal-title":"Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.02.020","article-title":"First and third trimester uterine scar thickness in women with previous Caesarean: a prospective comparative study","volume":"41","author":"Paquette","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17439","article-title":"Validation of prediction model for successful vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery based on sonographic assessment of hysterotomy scar","volume":"51","author":"Baranov","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12334","article-title":"Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study","volume":"41","author":"Naji","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12423","article-title":"Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography","volume":"41","author":"Naji","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.021","article-title":"Screening for placenta accreta at 11\u201314 weeks of gestation","volume":"205","author":"Stirnemann","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.05.012","article-title":"Prevalence and clinical effect of caesarean scar defects in women undergoing IVF","volume":"47","author":"Mensi","year":"2023","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.05.011","article-title":"Cesarean scar niche, fertility and uterine rupture during laborm- a retrospective study","volume":"286","author":"Cohen","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1719065","article-title":"Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture","volume":"35","author":"Risager","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4370","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1849121","article-title":"Ultrasonic assessment of cesarean section scar to vesicovaginal fold distance: an instrument to estimate pre-labor uterine rupture risk","volume":"35","author":"Vimercati","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20184","article-title":"Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial","volume":"53","author":"Vikhareva","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-014-0365-3","article-title":"Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study","volume":"14","author":"Pomorski","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318209abf0","article-title":"Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women","volume":"117","author":"Vikhareva Osser","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"901.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.07.011","article-title":"Change of the residual myometrial thickness during pregnancy in women who underwent laparoscopic niche resection compared with controls without niche surgery: a prospective comparative cohort study","volume":"227","author":"Jordans","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12376","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study","volume":"42","author":"Glavind","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181df925f","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"115","author":"Guise","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13585","article-title":"Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness after prior cesarean section to predict uterine rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"98","author":"Swift","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0051","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21939","article-title":"Value of first-trimester ultrasound in prediction of third-trimester sonographic stage of placenta accreta spectrum disorder and surgical outcome","volume":"55","author":"Cal\u00ed","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0052","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20104","article-title":"Screening for morbidly adherent placenta in early pregnancy","volume":"53","author":"Panaiotova","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0053","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.019","article-title":"Cesarean in the second stage: a possible risk factor for subsequent spontaneous preterm birth","volume":"217","author":"Berghella","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0054","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1007\/s40477-014-0116-3","article-title":"Scar thickness measurement by transvaginal sonography in late second trimester and third trimester in pregnant patients with previous cesarean section: does sequential change in scar thickness with gestational age correlate with mode of delivery?","volume":"18","author":"Singh","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Ultrasound"},{"issue":"Suppl1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.5455\/medarh.2012.66.s41-s44","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after Cesarean section and next birth","volume":"66","author":"Basic","year":"2012","journal-title":"Med Arch"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0056","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11132","article-title":"Visibility and measurement of cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study","volume":"40","author":"Naji","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0057","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1177\/0300060520954993","article-title":"Safety and feasibility of trial of labor in pregnant women with cesarean scar diverticulum","volume":"48","author":"Zheng","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Int Med Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0058","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1159\/000478046","article-title":"Changes in the uterine scar during the first year after a Caesarean section: a prospective longitudinal study","volume":"83","author":"van der Voet","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0059","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.16220","article-title":"Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar before pregnancy and at 11\u201314\u2009weeks of gestation: a prospective cohort study","volume":"50","author":"Baranov","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"895","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14744","article-title":"Incidence and ultrasonographic characteristics of cesarean scar niches after uterine closure by double-layer barbed suture: a prospective comparative study","volume":"162","author":"Alessandri","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0061","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/s003300050103","article-title":"Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections","volume":"7","author":"Dicle","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8864","article-title":"Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting","volume":"37","author":"Bij de Vaate","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839_bib0063","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12542","article-title":"Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding","volume":"121","author":"van der Voet","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933325002381?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2589933325002381?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,9]],"date-time":"2026-06-09T12:02:53Z","timestamp":1781006573000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2589933325002381"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"references-count":63,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S2589933325002381"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-9333"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-9333","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A systematic review of transvaginal ultrasound assessment of cesarean scar characteristics and prediction of adverse obstetric outcomes","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101839","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"101839"}}