{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T18:26:46Z","timestamp":1793730406825,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,1]],"date-time":"2026-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1793491200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,1]],"date-time":"2026-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1793491200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["aacpajpe.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]],"date-time":"2026-08-22T08:42:30Z","timestamp":1787388150000},"page":"102074","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Three-Option Multiple-Choice Questions Retain Discrimination and Reliability: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study in Pharmacy Education"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"90","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8790-4026","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zachary R.","family":"Noel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Min","family":"Jiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adam M.","family":"Persky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jacqueline E.","family":"McLaughlin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1037\/stl0000062","article-title":"Multiple-choice questions: tips for optimizing assessment in-seat and online","volume":"2","author":"Xu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Scholarsh Teach Learn Psychol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib2","article-title":"Assessment in undergraduate competency-based medical education: a systematic review","volume":"16","author":"Gupta","year":"2024","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1186\/s12909-019-1801-x","article-title":"Adding to the debate on the numbers of options for MCQs: the case for not being limited to MCQs with three, four or five options","volume":"19","author":"Tweed","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib4","unstructured":"Esmaeeli B., Esmaeili Shandiz E., Norooziasl S., et al. The optimal number of choices in multiple-choice tests: a systematic review. Medical Education Bulletin. September 1; 2021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22034\/meb.2021.311998.1031."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib5","first-page":"84","article-title":"The impact of 3-option responses to multiple-choice questions on guessing strategies and cut score determinations","volume":"5","author":"Royal","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Adv Med Educ Prof"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.14434\/josotl.v16i1.19106","article-title":"Validity and reliability of scores obtained on multiple-choice questions: why functioning distractors matter","volume":"16","author":"Ali","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Scholarsh Teach Learn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6920-9-40","article-title":"An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis","volume":"9","author":"Tarrant","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib8","first-page":"3","article-title":"Three options are optimal for multiple-choice items: a meta-analysis of 80 years of research. Educ Meas Issues Pract","volume":"24","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2005"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1007\/s10459-018-9855-9","article-title":"The optimal number of options for multiple-choice questions on high-stakes tests: application of a revised index for detecting nonfunctional distractors","volume":"24","author":"Raymond","year":"2019","journal-title":"Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj-cs.2441","article-title":"Automatic distractor generation in multiple-choice questions: a systematic literature review","volume":"10","author":"Awalurahman","year":"2024","journal-title":"PeerJ Comput Sci"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1020","DOI":"10.1111\/medu.12525","article-title":"Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting","volume":"48","author":"Schneid","year":"2014","journal-title":"Med Educ"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.1177\/0013164493053003021","article-title":"More evidence in favor of three-option multiple-choice tests","volume":"53","author":"Landrum","year":"1993","journal-title":"Educ Psychol Meas"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.4103\/0253-7613.190757","article-title":"Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: a randomized study","volume":"48","author":"Vegada","year":"2016","journal-title":"Indian J Pharmacol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1186\/s12909-023-04206-3","article-title":"Decreasing the options\u2019 number in multiple choice questions in the assessment of senior medical students and its effect on exam psychometrics and distractors\u2019 function","volume":"23","author":"Al-Lawama","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1430","DOI":"10.1186\/s12909-025-08026-5","article-title":"Less is more? A systematic review and network meta-analysis on MCQ option numbers","volume":"25","author":"Sridharan","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2025.101408","article-title":"Item discrimination, difficulty, and response time for 4-option multiple choice questions versus 3-option multiple choice questions","volume":"89","author":"Jiang","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Pharm Educ"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.3102\/0013189X20912798","article-title":"Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions","volume":"49","author":"Kraft","year":"2020","journal-title":"Educ Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1023\/B:AHSE.0000038173.00909.f6","article-title":"A visitor\u2019s guide to effect sizes: statistical significance versus practical (clinical) importance of research findings","volume":"9","author":"Hojat","year":"2004","journal-title":"Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib19","series-title":"Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences","author":"Cohen","year":"2013"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2923.2002.01294.x","article-title":"Assessing health professionals","volume":"36","author":"Crossley","year":"2002","journal-title":"Med Educ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib21","series-title":"Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory","author":"Crocker","year":"1986"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1177\/0013164493053004013","article-title":"How many options is enough for a multiple-choice test item","volume":"53","author":"Haladyna","year":"1993","journal-title":"Educ Psychol Meas"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.5688\/ajpe9012","article-title":"Gaps and opportunities for faculty workload policies in pharmacy and health professions education","volume":"87","author":"Park","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Pharm Educ"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2015.1022136","article-title":"Criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments: compatibility and complementarity","volume":"41","author":"Lok","year":"2016","journal-title":"Assess Eval Higher Educ"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002945926014324?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002945926014324?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T17:31:49Z","timestamp":1793727109000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002945926014324"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,11]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002945926014324"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9459"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9459","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Three-Option Multiple-Choice Questions Retain Discrimination and Reliability: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study in Pharmacy Education","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajpe.2026.102074","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"102074"}}