{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T16:20:38Z","timestamp":1790439638398,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,1]],"date-time":"2016-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1464739200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,1]],"date-time":"2016-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1464739200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Annals of Epidemiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,30]],"date-time":"2016-04-30T07:08:39Z","timestamp":1462000119000},"page":"405-411.e1","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Comparing expectant management and spontaneous labor approaches in studying the effect of labor induction on cesarean delivery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Valery A.","family":"Danilack","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth W.","family":"Triche","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David D.","family":"Dore","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Janet H.","family":"Muri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maureen G.","family":"Phipps","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David A.","family":"Savitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2010","volume":"61","author":"Martin","year":"2012","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"7189","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"995","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.318.7189.995","article-title":"Abc of labour care: Induction","volume":"318","author":"Chamberlain","year":"1999","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.016","article-title":"Induction of labor in the united states: a critical appraisal of appropriateness and reducibility","volume":"36","author":"Chauhan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182255999","article-title":"Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth","volume":"118","author":"Spong","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e10c5c","article-title":"Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term","volume":"116","author":"Ehrenthal","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c4ef96","article-title":"Term labor induction compared with expectant management","volume":"115","author":"Glantz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01298.x","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes following induction of labor: a cohort study","volume":"91","author":"Grivell","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib8","first-page":"287","article-title":"Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates","volume":"102","author":"Heffner","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.458","article-title":"Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"188","author":"Johnson","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib10","first-page":"600","article-title":"Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women","volume":"94","author":"Seyb","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1094","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x","article-title":"Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women","volume":"90","author":"Thorsell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","article-title":"Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions","volume":"180","author":"Yeast","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.003","article-title":"Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age","volume":"195","author":"Caughey","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007","article-title":"Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy","volume":"151","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01160.x","article-title":"Cesarean section after induction of labor compared with expectant management: no added risk from gestational week 39","volume":"90","author":"Rasmussen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"122","author":"Darney","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.09.019","article-title":"Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes","volume":"207","author":"Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2838","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e2838","article-title":"Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study","volume":"344","author":"Stock","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c7087","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (digitat)","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"24","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The canadian multicenter post-term pregnancy trial group","volume":"326","author":"Hannah","year":"1992","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"9694","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60736-4","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (hypitat): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"374","author":"Koopmans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.130925","article-title":"Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"186","author":"Mishanina","year":"2014","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib23","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"6","author":"Gulmezoglu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib24","series-title":"Specifications Manual for Joint Commission National Quality Core Measures\u2014Version 2012B","year":"2012"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"992","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.058","article-title":"Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data","volume":"194","author":"Yasmeen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.85.8_Pt_1.1143","article-title":"Using icd-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections: agreement with clinical records","volume":"85","author":"Henry","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1387","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.10762","article-title":"Using administrative data to identify indications for elective primary cesarean delivery","volume":"37","author":"Gregory","year":"2002","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000029","article-title":"Elective induction of labor symposium: nomenclature, research methodological issues, and outcomes","volume":"57","author":"Darney","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1159\/000166307","article-title":"Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"67","author":"Ennen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903168432","article-title":"Is preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery if labor is induced?","volume":"23","author":"Kim","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.072","article-title":"The impact of duration of labor induction on cesarean rate","volume":"199","author":"Michelson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.119643","article-title":"Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study","volume":"186","author":"Cammu","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.106748","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication","volume":"183","author":"Dublin","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.07.001","article-title":"Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect","volume":"191","author":"Luthy","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib35","first-page":"917","article-title":"Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term","volume":"95","author":"Maslow","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1547-5069.2010.01346.x","article-title":"The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction","volume":"42","author":"Wilson","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Nurs Scholarsh"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12043","article-title":"Elective induction of labor and the risk of cesarean section in low-risk parous women: a cohort study","volume":"92","author":"Jonsson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib38","first-page":"399","article-title":"Elective induction of labor in multiparous women. Does it increase the risk of cesarean section?","volume":"47","author":"Heinberg","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouenraets","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701245427","article-title":"Elective induction of labor: failure to follow guidelines and risk of cesarean delivery","volume":"86","author":"Le Ray","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1003","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349.2010.500009","article-title":"Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction","volume":"89","author":"Roos","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"}],"container-title":["Annals of Epidemiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1047279716301120?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1047279716301120?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,20]],"date-time":"2025-10-20T02:19:10Z","timestamp":1760926750000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1047279716301120"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S1047279716301120"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["1047-2797"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1047-2797","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparing expectant management and spontaneous labor approaches in studying the effect of labor induction on cesarean delivery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Annals of Epidemiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.annepidem.2016.04.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}