{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,4]],"date-time":"2026-08-04T01:49:19Z","timestamp":1785808159833,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"AVES YAYINCILIK A.\u015e.","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]],"date-time":"2020-02-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1581033600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,24]],"date-time":"2016-09-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1474675200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["AOTT"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective: The aim of this study was to assess appropriateness of the sizes of available cervical disc prostheses based on tomographic measurement of human cervical vertebrae.\n\nMethods: The anatomic dimensions of the C3eC7 segments were measured on 50 patients (age range 26e47 years) with computerized tomography scan and compared with the sizes of the popular cervical total disc prostheses (CTDP) at the market [Bryan (Medtronic), Prodisc-C (Synthes), Prestige LP (Medtronic), Discover (DePuy)]. The mediolateral and anteriorposterior diameters of the upper and lower endplates were measured with a digital measuring system.\n\nResults: Overall, 43.7% of the largest implant footprints were smaller in the anterior-posterior diameter and 42.6% in the mediolateral diameter were smaller than cervical endplate measurements. Discrepancy of the level C5\/C6 and C6\/C7 was calculated as 56.2% at the anteroposterior diameter and 43.8% at the center of mediolateral diameter.\n\nConclusion: Large disparity has been found between the sizes of devices and cervical anatomic data. Companies that produce CTDP should take care of the anatomical dimensions and generate different sizes of CTDP. Spine surgeon should be familiar with the size mismatch in CTDP that may affect the clinical and radiological outcome of the surgery<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,21]],"date-time":"2016-10-21T18:16:04Z","timestamp":1477073764000},"page":"544-547","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Discrepancy between cervical disc prostheses and anatomical cervical dimensions"],"prefix":"10.5152","volume":"50","author":[{"given":"Sinan","family":"Karaca","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmet","family":"Onur Akpolat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmet","family":"\u00d6ztermeli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mehmet","family":"Nuri Erdem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mehmet","family":"Aydo\u011fan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"3111","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1097\/00024720-200404000-00001","article-title":"Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine","volume":"17","author":"Goffin","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2673","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA","article-title":"Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level","volume":"28","author":"Goffin","year":"2003","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2004.1.2.0155","article-title":"The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004","volume":"1","author":"Mummaneni","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"1 Suppl.","key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2002.96.1.0017","article-title":"Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease","volume":"96","author":"Wigfield","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Neurosurg"},{"issue":"15","key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181aa643b","article-title":"Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in\u00a0vivo image-based finite element study","volume":"34","author":"Lin","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2006.01.007","article-title":"Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty","volume":"6","author":"Fong","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1097\/00024720-200308000-00009","article-title":"Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charit\u00e9 disc","volume":"16","author":"van Ooij","year":"2003","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1757-7861.2010.00069.x","article-title":"Complications of Bryan cervical disc replacement","volume":"2","author":"Cao","year":"2010","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315S","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.07.024","article-title":"Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) disc","volume":"4","author":"Pimenta","year":"2004","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3180310534","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow- up","volume":"20","author":"Sasso","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2008.05.006","volume":"9","author":"Murrey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib12","series-title":"20th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society (NASS)","article-title":"Complications and rescue strategies in TDR procedures","author":"Bertagnoli","year":"2005"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1007\/s005860000140","article-title":"Geometrical dimensions of the lower lumbar vertebrae analysis of data from digitised CT images","volume":"9","author":"Zhou","year":"2000","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1852","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31811ece5a","article-title":"Loss of cervical endplate integrity following minimal surface preparation","volume":"32","author":"Cheng","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1077","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200005010-00007","article-title":"Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs","volume":"25","author":"Steffen","year":"2000","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E376","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318067e384","article-title":"Quantitative anatomy of the endplate of the middle and lower cervical vertebrae in Koreans","volume":"32","author":"Kim","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2594-3","article-title":"Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty","volume":"22","author":"Thaler","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.3901\/JME.2015.19.197","article-title":"Footprint mismatch of cervical disc prostheses with Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions","volume":"128","author":"Dong","year":"2015","journal-title":"Chin Med J (Engl)"}],"container-title":["Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1017995X1630195X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1017995X1630195X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.aott.org.tr\/index.php\/pub\/article\/download\/3176\/3126","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,18]],"date-time":"2025-11-18T19:58:14Z","timestamp":1763495894000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.aott.org.tr\/index.php\/pub\/article\/view\/3176"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,5]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["2589-1294","1017-995X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2589-1294","type":"electronic"},{"value":"1017-995X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Discrepancy between cervical disc prostheses and anatomical cervical dimensions","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.aott.2016.03.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}