{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T04:48:44Z","timestamp":1790225324454,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,1]],"date-time":"2018-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1535760000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,1]],"date-time":"2018-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1535760000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","archives-pmr.org","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,30]],"date-time":"2018-04-30T09:28:54Z","timestamp":1525080534000},"page":"1805-1810","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["A Factor Analysis of Functional Independence and Functional Assessment Measure Scores Among Focal and Diffuse Brain Injury Patients: The Importance of Bifactor Models"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"99","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8492-060X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sarah","family":"Gunn","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gerald H.","family":"Burgess","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Maltby","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1387","DOI":"10.1080\/09638280701315011","article-title":"Return to work following traumatic brain injury: Trends and challenges","volume":"29","author":"Shames","year":"2007","journal-title":"Disabil Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0147288","article-title":"The UK functional assessment measure (UK FIM+FAM): psychometric evaluation in patients undergoing specialist rehabilitation following a stroke from the national UK clinical dataset","volume":"11","author":"Nayar","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib3","author":"Turner-Stokes"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1191\/026921599676896799","article-title":"The UK\u00a0FIM+FAM: development and evaluation","volume":"13","author":"Turner-Stokes","year":"1999","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1080\/09638280802355049","article-title":"The UK FIM+FAM extended activities of daily living module: evaluation of scoring accuracy and reliability","volume":"31","author":"Law","year":"2009","journal-title":"Disabil Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1885","DOI":"10.3109\/09638288.2013.766271","article-title":"A comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the UK FIM\u2009+\u2009FAM","volume":"35","author":"Turner-Stokes","year":"2013","journal-title":"Disabil Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1136\/jnnp.67.6.749","article-title":"Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: a psychometric analysis","volume":"67","author":"Hawley","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib8","unstructured":"UK FIM+FAM Users Group. The UK FIM+FAM (functional assessment measure) version 2.2. Middlesex: 2010. Available at https:\/\/www.kcl.ac.uk\/nursing\/departments\/cicelysaunders\/resources\/FIMFAM-manual-v2.2-Sept-2012-print-double-sided.pdf. Accessed December 26, 2017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1053\/apmr.2001.21525","article-title":"Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals","volume":"82","author":"Hall","year":"2001","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0147288","article-title":"The UK functional assessment measure (UK FIM+FAM): psychometric evaluation in patients undergoing specialist rehabilitation following a stroke from the national UK clinical dataset","volume":"11","author":"Nayar","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1080\/00223891.2010.496477","article-title":"Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores","volume":"92","author":"Reise","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Pers Assess"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1212\/WNL.47.2.388","article-title":"Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting","volume":"47","author":"Ween","year":"1996","journal-title":"Neurology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1080\/02699050701253095","article-title":"Do lesion site and severity predict deficits in attentional control after preschool traumatic brain injury (TBI)?","volume":"21","author":"Power","year":"2007","journal-title":"Brain Inj"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.1.1.16","article-title":"The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis","volume":"1","author":"Curran","year":"1996","journal-title":"Psychol Methods"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib16","series-title":"SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 17.0 update","author":"George","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib17","series-title":"Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications","first-page":"56","article-title":"Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies","author":"West","year":"1995"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib18","series-title":"Factor analysis","author":"Gorsuch","year":"1983"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.99.3.432","article-title":"Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain","volume":"99","author":"Zwick","year":"1986","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.4.3.272","article-title":"Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research","volume":"4","author":"Fabrigar","year":"1999","journal-title":"Psychol Methods"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib21","series-title":"Using multivariate statistics","first-page":"659","article-title":"Principal components and factor analysis","author":"Tabachnick","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.4.2.192","article-title":"On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modelling with latent variables: when \u201cgood\u201d indicators are bad and \u201cbad\u201d indicators are good","volume":"4","author":"Little","year":"1999","journal-title":"Psychol Methods"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.3.2.231","article-title":"Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery","volume":"3","author":"Velicer","year":"1998","journal-title":"Psychol Methods"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"815","DOI":"10.1016\/j.paid.2006.09.018","article-title":"Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit","volume":"42","author":"Barrett","year":"2007","journal-title":"Pers Individ Dif"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib25","first-page":"1","article-title":"Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model","volume":"6","author":"Hu","year":"1999","journal-title":"A Multidiscip J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib26","series-title":"Principles and practice of structural equation modeling","author":"Kline","year":"2005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.88.3.588","article-title":"Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures","volume":"88","author":"Bentler","year":"1980","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/10705519909540118","article-title":"Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives","volume":"6 SRC-G","author":"Hu","year":"1999","journal-title":"Struct Equ Model"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib29","first-page":"233","article-title":"Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model","volume":"9","author":"Cheung","year":"2002","journal-title":"A Multidiscip J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib30","author":"J\u00f6reskog"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.112.1.155","article-title":"A power primer","volume":"112","author":"Cohen","year":"1992","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1017\/S1355617708080272","article-title":"Functional outcome 10 years after traumatic brain injury: its relationship with demographic, injury severity, and cognitive and emotional status","volume":"14","author":"Ponsford","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Int Neuropsychol Soc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1136\/jnnp.55.5.347","article-title":"Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: prospective evaluation of five multivariate models and comparison with simple methods","volume":"55","author":"Gladman","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Neurol Neurosurgery, Psychiatry"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1161\/01.STR.17.4.765","article-title":"Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review","volume":"17","author":"Jongbloed","year":"1986","journal-title":"Stroke"}],"container-title":["Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0003999318302740?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0003999318302740?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,1]],"date-time":"2024-06-01T00:02:42Z","timestamp":1717200162000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0003999318302740"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0003999318302740"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005","relation":{},"ISSN":["0003-9993"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0003-9993","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A Factor Analysis of Functional Independence and Functional Assessment Measure Scores Among Focal and Diffuse Brain Injury Patients: The Importance of Bifactor Models","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.apmr.2018.04.005","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}