{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,17]],"date-time":"2026-09-17T00:33:46Z","timestamp":1789605226008,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,1]],"date-time":"2016-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1472688000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","arthroplastyjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Arthroplasty"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,28]],"date-time":"2016-05-28T07:02:29Z","timestamp":1464418949000},"page":"148-151","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"special_numbering":"S","title":["Recurrent Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Irrigation and Debridement With Component Retention Is Most Often Due to Identical Organisms"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"31","author":[{"given":"Benjamin M.","family":"Zmistowski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jorge","family":"Manrique","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ripal","family":"Patel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2040-8188","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Antonia F.","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"858","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1996.03530350040032","article-title":"A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip","volume":"275","author":"Chang","year":"1996","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B6.34806","article-title":"Lifetime cost effectiveness of different brands of prosthesis used for total hip arthroplasty: a study using the NJR dataset","volume":"97\u2013B","author":"Pennington","year":"2015","journal-title":"Bone Jt J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.00169","article-title":"Effect of age on cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty in the U.S.","volume":"97","author":"Ghomrawi","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2012.02.022","article-title":"Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States","volume":"27","author":"Kurtz","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1645","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMra040181","article-title":"Prosthetic-joint infections","volume":"351","author":"Zimmerli","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e104","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.K.01417","article-title":"Management of periprosthetic joint infection: the current knowledge AAOS exhibit selection","volume":"94","author":"Parvizi","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2177","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.L.00789","article-title":"Periprosthetic joint infection increases the risk of one-year mortality","volume":"95","author":"Zmistowski","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-012-2595-x","article-title":"Two-stage treatment of hip periprosthetic joint infection is associated with a high rate of infection control but high mortality","volume":"471","author":"Berend","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-010-1434-1","article-title":"The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: fate of two-stage reimplantation after failed irrigation and d\u00e9bridement for periprosthetic knee infection","volume":"469","author":"Sherrell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"880","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2009.12.010","article-title":"Repeat 2-stage revision for recurrent infection of total hip arthroplasty","volume":"25","author":"Kalra","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"923","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2011.11.006","article-title":"Repeat 2-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a viable option?","volume":"27","author":"Mortazavi","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1706","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-0739-4","article-title":"Outcome of a second two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection","volume":"467","author":"Azzam","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-201012000-00007","article-title":"AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline: diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee","volume":"18","author":"Parvizi","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20100722-42","article-title":"Periprosthetic joint infection: treatment options","volume":"33","author":"Parvizi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2011.03.031","article-title":"Irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic infections does the organism matter?","volume":"26","author":"Odum","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2012.01.003","article-title":"The preoperative prediction of success following irrigation and debridement with polyethylene exchange for hip and knee prosthetic joint infections","volume":"27","author":"Buller","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"404","key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200211000-00022","article-title":"Results of direct exchange or debridement of the infected total knee arthroplasty","author":"Silva","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-012-2373-9","article-title":"Failure of irrigation and debridement for early postoperative periprosthetic infection","volume":"471","author":"Fehring","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-5403(03)00288-2","article-title":"Limited success with open debridement and retention of components in the treatment of acute Staphylococcus aureus infections after total knee arthroplasty","volume":"18","author":"Deirmengian","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1486","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2013.02.021","article-title":"Recurrent periprosthetic joint infection: persistent or new infection?","volume":"28","author":"Zmistowski","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib21","first-page":"S98","article-title":"Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection","volume":"32","author":"Zmistowski","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Orthop Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(92)90133-8","article-title":"Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases","volume":"45","author":"Deyo","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"984","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2007.10.017","article-title":"Infection Burden for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States","volume":"23","author":"Kurtz","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1022","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2010.01.104","article-title":"Irrigation and debridement in the management of prosthetic joint infection: traditional indications revisited","volume":"25","author":"Azzam","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3043","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-011-1910-2","article-title":"Infection control rate of irrigation and d\u00e9bridement for periprosthetic joint infection","volume":"469","author":"Koyonos","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-5403(05)80140-8","article-title":"Efficacy of intraoperative cultures obtained during revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"10","author":"Padgett","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/cis746","article-title":"A large multicenter study of methicillin\u2013susceptible and methicillin\u2013resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections managed with implant retention","volume":"56","author":"Lora-Tamayo","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Infect Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.76B5.8083257","article-title":"Influence of metal implants on infection. An experimental study in rabbits","volume":"76","author":"Cordero","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2007.06.015","article-title":"The influence of the alloy of megaprostheses on infection rate","volume":"23","author":"Gosheger","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"918","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.85B6.13509","article-title":"Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus. A mechanism for the indolence of osteomyelitis","volume":"85","author":"Ellington","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Arthroplasty"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0883540316302194?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0883540316302194?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,30]],"date-time":"2022-06-30T20:16:01Z","timestamp":1656620161000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0883540316302194"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0883540316302194"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040","relation":{},"ISSN":["0883-5403"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0883-5403","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Recurrent Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Irrigation and Debridement With Component Retention Is Most Often Due to Identical Organisms","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Journal of Arthroplasty","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2016.05.040","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}