{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T06:41:20Z","timestamp":1790059280839,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,12,1]],"date-time":"2005-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1133395200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,12,1]],"date-time":"2005-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1133395200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,12,1]],"date-time":"2005-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1133395200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,12,1]],"date-time":"2005-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1133395200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["arthroscopyjournal.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare the outcome of patients who underwent rotator cuff repair using all arthroscopic or mini\u2010open repair techniques.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Type of Study<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Retrospective comparative study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We retrospectively reviewed 54 patients who underwent either mini\u2010open or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Twenty\u2010six patients underwent mini\u2010open repair and 28 patients had arthroscopic repair. Follow\u2010up averaged 33 months (range, 18 to 48 months) for the mini\u2010open group and 19 months (range, 13 to 26 months) for the arthroscopic group. The patient groups were similar with regard to age, activity level, mechanisms of injury, associated findings at surgery, and tear size measured in square centimeters. The outcome for the 2 groups was evaluated using a modified American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson correlations and the Student\n                      <jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>\n                      test.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The tear size averaged 2.7 cm\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      for the mini\u2010open group and 2.0 cm\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      for the arthroscopic group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .754). All patients showed significant improvement in their scores for pain, satisfaction, and function at the time of follow\u2010up. The average preoperative and postoperative scores for the mini\u2010open group were as follows: pain 17 and 27 (30 possible points), satisfaction 3 and 9 (10 possible points), function 32 and 53 (60 possible points), and total 52 and 89 (100 possible points) (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .05). For patients who underwent arthroscopic repair, average preoperative and postoperative scores were as follows: pain 12 and 26, satisfaction 2 and 9, function 28 and 51, and total, 42 and 86 (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .05). Improvement in scores within each group was significant, but the difference in total scores between the 2 techniques was not statistically significant.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study confirms that short\u2010term results for arthroscopic and mini\u2010open rotator cuff repair are similar and supports continued use of arthroscopic repair techniques.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Level III, retrospective comparative study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.09.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,12,22]],"date-time":"2005-12-22T19:18:57Z","timestamp":1135279137000},"page":"1415-1420","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":92,"title":["Arthroscopic Versus Mini\u2010Open Rotator Cuff Repair: A Comparison of Clinical Outcome"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Andreas M.","family":"Sauerbrey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow Service University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charles L.","family":"Getz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow Service University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marco","family":"Piancastelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Bologna Bologna Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joseph P.","family":"Iannotti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew L.","family":"Ramsey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow Service University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"suffix":"Jr","given":"Gerald R.","family":"Williams","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow Service University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2005,12,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_2_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199806000-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199801000-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(98)70119-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mse.2001.110514"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465000280030401"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_7_1","first-page":"566","article-title":"[Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a multicentric retrospective study of 87 cases with anatomical assessment]","volume":"86","author":"Gleyze P.","year":"2000","journal-title":"Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/1058-2746(92)90089-L"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s001320050539"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2003.50036"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/036354659402200104"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(96)90219-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2001.26821"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2003.50131"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(05)80374-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2003.50083"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(03)00169-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198567090-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198668080-00002"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2002.26480"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199173070-00004"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806305013265?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806305013265?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.09.008","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.09.008","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.09.008","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T09:08:39Z","timestamp":1773565719000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.09.008"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,12]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.09.008"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.09.008","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Arthroscopic Versus Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair: A Comparison of Clinical Outcome","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.09.008","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2005 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}