{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T20:51:04Z","timestamp":1773607864800,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,1,21]],"date-time":"2008-01-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1200873600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,1,21]],"date-time":"2008-01-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1200873600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100009026","name":"Smith and Nephew","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100009026","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100001765","name":"Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100001765","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100009914","name":"Naval Medical Center Portsmouth","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100009914","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The ideal surgical management of isolated and combined posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries is controversial. One active debate concerns the advantages of an open tibial inlay technique versus an arthroscopic transtibial tunnel technique. Therefore, the goal of this study is to biomechanically compare arthroscopic and open double\u2010bundle PCL tibial inlay procedure with and without posterolateral corner (PLC) deficiency.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Ten matched pairs of cadaveric knees were randomly assigned to undergo PCL sectioning and reconstruction using either the open inlay or arthroscopic inlay approach. Clinical testing consisted of posterior drawer, TELOS stress testing, and dial testing at both 30\u00b0 and 90\u00b0. The knee conditions tested were intact, after PCL sectioning, after PLC release, and following PCL reconstruction, with and without the PLC repair. Both 1\u2010way repeated measures and 2\u2010way mixed design analyses of variance were used to determine differences between the knee conditions, with significance set at\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .05.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>After PCL and PLC reconstruction, 10 of 10 open specimens and 9 of 10 arthroscopic specimens were a grade 0 posterior drawer. The remaining arthroscopic specimen was grade I. The average radiographic posterior displacement for arthroscopic and open reconstructions (PCL+\/PLC+) was 3.9 and 2.7 mm, respectively, with no significant difference. However, if the PLC was deficient (PCL+\/PLC\u2010), the translation for arthroscopic and open specimens increased to 8.5 and 6.5 mm, respectively, and was statistically different from the intact state but not from each other. At 30\u00b0 of knee flexion, both the open and arthroscopic specimen averaged 8.4\u00b0 of external rotation. At 90\u00b0 of knee flexion, the external rotation measurements increased to 9.6\u00b0 and 9.3\u00b0 in the arthroscopic and open groups, respectively. Additionally, there was no significant difference in external rotation between intact and reconstructed knees with either group.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The arthroscopic method of double\u2010bundle inlay PCL reconstruction provides comparable stability to the open inlay using clinically relevant measurement tools both in the PLC intact or deficient state.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This novel arthroscopic double\u2010bundle PCL inlay reconstruction provides comparable stability to the open approach with a potential for lower operative morbidity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.09.012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,1,8]],"date-time":"2008-01-08T10:32:44Z","timestamp":1199788364000},"page":"472-480","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":38,"title":["Comparison of a Double Bundle Arthroscopic Inlay and Open Inlay Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Clinically Relevant Tools: A Cadaveric Study"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Chad T.","family":"Zehms","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Bone and Joint\/Sports Medicine Institute Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Portsmouth Virginia U.S.A."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"David R.","family":"Whiddon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Bone and Joint\/Sports Medicine Institute Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Portsmouth Virginia U.S.A."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mark D.","family":"Miller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia U.S.A."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J. Scott","family":"Quinby","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sports Medicine Clinic of North Texas Dallas Texas U.S.A."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Scott L.","family":"Montgomery","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Ochsner Clinic New Orleans Louisiana U.S.A."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R. Brick","family":"Campbell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Virginia Institute for Sports Medicine Virginia Beach Virginia U.S.A."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jon K.","family":"Sekiya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"MedSport\u2013Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan U.S.A."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,1,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_2_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2004.01.039"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0749-8063(95)90127-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2002.36515"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_5_1","first-page":"3","article-title":"The incidence of knee ligament injuries in the general population","volume":"4","author":"Miyasaka K.C.","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Knee Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/036354658901700104"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2002.35142"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/036354659602400310"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465990270030201"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2001.23425"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.80B1.0800173"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546504268039"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2001.20661"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546503261717"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200204000-00002"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465020300030201"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465010290020401"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(05)80067-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0278-5919(05)70011-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465030310020701"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00441621"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0749-8063(95)90091-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2002.32208"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546503261511"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2004.04.023"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(03)00651-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.08.024"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2004.08.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546507302216"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198870010-00014"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/036354659702500510"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(03)00399-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/036354659402200419"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s001670050082"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_35_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Stress radiography of the knee: Cruciate ligament function studied in 138 patients","volume":"249","author":"Staubli H.U.","year":"1992","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Scand Suppl"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-006-0086-x"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.08.057"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200206000-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465980260030801"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546504265594"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/036354659502300102"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.08.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_43_1","first-page":"137","article-title":"Vascular risk associated with a posterior approach for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the tibial inlay technique","volume":"15","author":"Miller M.D.","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Knee Surg"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806307009401?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806307009401?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.09.012","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.09.012","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.09.012","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T08:45:57Z","timestamp":1773564357000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.09.012"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,1,21]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.09.012"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.09.012","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,1,21]]}}}