{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T01:06:02Z","timestamp":1792631162052,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,21]],"date-time":"2008-05-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1211328000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,21]],"date-time":"2008-05-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1211328000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The purpose of this study was to compare the time\u2010zero biomechanical strength and the surface area of repair between a single\u2010row modified Mason\u2010Allen rotator cuff repair and a double\u2010row arthroscopic repair.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Six matched pairs of sheep infraspinatus tendons were repaired by both techniques. Pressure\u2010sensitive film was used to measure the surface area of repair for each configuration. Specimens were biomechanically tested with cyclic loading from 20 N to 30 N for 20 cycles and were loaded to failure at a rate of 1 mm\/s. Failure was defined at 5 mm of gap formation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Double\u2010row suture anchor fixation restored a mean surface area of 258.23 \u00b1 69.7 mm\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      versus 148.08 \u00b1 75.5 mm\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      for single\u2010row fixation, a 74% increase (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .025). Both repairs had statistically similar time\u2010zero biomechanics. There was no statistical difference in peak\u2010to\u2010peak displacement or elongation during cyclic loading. Single\u2010row fixation showed a higher mean load to failure (110.26 \u00b1 26.4 N) than double\u2010row fixation (108.93 \u00b1 21.8 N). This was not statistically significant (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .932). All specimens failed at the suture\u2010tendon interface.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Double\u2010row suture anchor fixation restores a greater percentage of the anatomic footprint when compared with a single\u2010row Mason\u2010Allen technique. The time\u2010zero biomechanical strength was not significantly different between the 2 study groups. This study suggests that the 2 factors are independent of each other.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Surface area and biomechanical strength of fixation are 2 independent factors in the outcome of rotator cuff repair. Maximizing both factors may increase the likelihood of complete tendon\u2010bone healing and ultimately improve clinical outcomes. For smaller tears, a single\u2010row modified Mason\u2010Allen suture technique may provide sufficient strength, but for large amenable tears, a double row can provide both strength and increased surface area for healing.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.03.011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,20]],"date-time":"2008-05-20T05:07:31Z","timestamp":1211260051000},"page":"941-948","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":114,"title":["Single\u2010Row Modified Mason\u2010Allen Versus Double\u2010Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Biomechanical and Surface Area Comparison"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Cory O.","family":"Nelson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery SUNY at Stony Brook University Hospital Stony Brook New York U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael J.","family":"Sileo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Stony Brook New York U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark G.","family":"Grossman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Winthrop University Hospital Mineola New York U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Frederick","family":"Serra\u2010Hsu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Biomedical Engineering SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook New York U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_3_2_1","unstructured":"AAOS research Web page statisticswww.aaos.org\/wordhtml\/research\/stats\/patientstats.asp Accessed April 23 2008."},{"key":"e_1_2_3_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199509000-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_4_1","first-page":"173","article-title":"Rotator cuff tears: Results of surgical repair","volume":"18","author":"Postacchini F.","year":"1992","journal-title":"Ital J Orthop Traumatol"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1058-2746(96)80025-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/17453679108999243"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200402000-00002"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.D.02035"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2002.32930"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2003.09.036"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(04)00808-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(03)00126-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199909000-00009"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.76B3.8175836"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200406000-00013"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2003.50079"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.06.022"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546504273053"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505279575"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505278256"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505281238"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.D.02887"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.07.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.00697"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.07.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-007-0382-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546507302218"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546507301661"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806308002247?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806308002247?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.03.011","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.03.011","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.03.011","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T09:18:25Z","timestamp":1773566305000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.03.011"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,21]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.03.011"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.03.011","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,5,21]]}}}