{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T10:41:21Z","timestamp":1790419281505,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,16]],"date-time":"2008-06-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1213574400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,16]],"date-time":"2008-06-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1213574400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007307","name":"Arthrex","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007307","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100008426","name":"DePuy Mitek","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100008426","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of 2 fixation methods for subpectoral proximal biceps tenodesis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      In 9 matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders, an open subpectoral tenodesis was performed 1 cm proximal to the inferior border of the pectoralis major tendon by use of either an 8 \u00d7 12\u2013mm Bio\u2010Tenodesis screw (Arthrex, Naples, FL) with No. 2 FiberWire sutures (Arthrex) or a 5.5\u2010mm Bio\u2010Corkscrew double\u2010loaded suture anchor (Arthrex) with No. 2 FiberWire sutures. The specimens were dissected and mounted in a material testing machine. Cyclic loading (20 to 60 N, 100 cycles, 0.5 mm\/s, 5\u2010N preload) was performed, followed by an unloaded 30\u2010minute rest, a 5\u2010N preload, and a load\u2010to\u2010failure protocol (1.25 mm\/s) with a 100\u2010lb load cell. Ultimate load (in Newtons), stiffness (in Newtons per millimeter), and modes of failure were recorded. Data were analyzed by use of paired\n                      <jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>\n                      tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Proximal biceps tenodeses with Bio\u2010Tenodesis screws had a significantly higher mean load to failure (169.6 \u00b1 50.5 N; range, 99.6 to 244.7 N) than those with Bio\u2010Corkscrew suture anchors (68.5 \u00b1 33.0 N; range, 24.2 to 119.4 N) (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .002). Bio\u2010Tenodesis screws also had a significantly higher stiffness (34.1 \u00b1 9.0 N\/mm; range, 20.6 to 48.9 N\/mm) than Bio\u2010Corkscrews (19.3 \u00b1 10.5; range, 5.9 to 32.9 N\/mm) (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .038).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this cadaveric study the Bio\u2010Tenodesis screw showed a statistically significantly higher load to failure and significantly higher stiffness than the Bio\u2010Corkscrew anchor when used for tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon in a subpectoral location.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Biomechanical comparison of these 2 fixation techniques provides information on stiffness and load to failure of alternate fixation methods.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.05.005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,17]],"date-time":"2008-06-17T05:11:51Z","timestamp":1213679511000},"page":"1103-1108","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":117,"title":["Interference Screw Versus Suture Anchor Fixation for Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Proximal Biceps Tendon: A Cadaveric Study"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"S. Raymond","family":"Golish","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"suffix":"III","given":"Paul E.","family":"Caldwell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopaedic Research of Virginia Richmond Virginia U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark D.","family":"Miller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Naveen","family":"Singanamala","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopaedic Research of Virginia Richmond Virginia U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anil S.","family":"Ranawat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gehron","family":"Treme","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sara E.","family":"Pearson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopaedic Research of Virginia Richmond Virginia U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ryan","family":"Costic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jon K.","family":"Sekiya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_3_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mse.2000.108386"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2000.4386"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.08.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2003.10.022"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2003.12.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.03.020"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.05.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505274716"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2004.01.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.04.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2004.10.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_13_1","first-page":"245","article-title":"Keyhold tenodesis of biceps origin at the shoulder","author":"Froimson A.I.","year":"1975","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2002.36115"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.09.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465020300032101"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/036354659402200119"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546503262644"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806308003836?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806308003836?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.05.005","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.05.005","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.05.005","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T08:43:18Z","timestamp":1773564198000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.05.005"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,16]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.05.005"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.05.005","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,16]]}}}