{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T02:33:56Z","timestamp":1791426836223,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,10]],"date-time":"2012-02-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1328832000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,10]],"date-time":"2012-02-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1328832000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,10]],"date-time":"2012-02-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1328832000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,10]],"date-time":"2012-02-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1328832000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007307","name":"Arthrex","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007307","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["arthroscopyjournal.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the biomechanical performance of an all\u2010soft suture anchor (JuggerKnot; Biomet, Warsaw, IN) in comparison with a classic solid suture anchor (2.4\u2010mm biocomposite SutureTak; Arthrex, Naples, FL) in an in vitro labral repair model.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We dissected 12 cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 61 \u00b1 9.4 years), leaving the labrum intact, and bone mineral density was obtained (mean, 0.375 \u00b1 0.06 g\/cm\n                      <jats:sup>3<\/jats:sup>\n                      ). Simulated labral tears were made at the anteroinferior and posteroinferior edges of the labrum. Repairs used 2 all\u2010soft suture anchors (JuggerKnot) or 2 solid anchors with free, high\u2010strength No. 2 suture (FiberWire; Arthrex) spanning the operative construct to load the repair. Differential variable reluctance transducers were used to measure labral displacement for each specimen. The testing protocol consisted of a preconditioning phase at 10 N for 10 cycles (1 Hz) and then a final load\u2010to\u2010failure testing at a rate of 3 mm\/min. Labral displacement of 2 mm was determined as the primary outcome.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      There was no statistical difference (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .22) in ultimate load to failure and displacement at ultimate failure (anchor pullout) between the all\u2010soft JuggerKnot (146.0 \u00b1 43.0 N and 19.8 \u00b1 5.4 mm, respectively) and the solid SutureTak (171.9 \u00b1 52.6 N and 22.3 \u00b1 6.8 mm, respectively). The solid anchor had a significantly higher ultimate load at 2 mm of labral displacement than the all\u2010soft suture anchor (84.1 \u00b1 19.0 N and 39.2 \u00b1 10.6 N, respectively;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .001).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Whereas both the solid SutureTak and the all\u2010soft JuggerKnot displayed similar results on ultimate load\u2010to\u2010failure testing, the solid anchor required significantly greater load for 2 mm of labral displacement than the all\u2010soft anchor.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The all\u2010soft anchor (JuggerKnot) is similar in biomechanical performance to the classic solid anchor (SutureTak) with the exception of load at 2 mm of labral displacement, suggesting micromotion of the device.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.10.024","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,1]],"date-time":"2012-02-01T17:52:50Z","timestamp":1328118770000},"page":"642-648","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":126,"title":["Biomechanical Evaluation of Classic Solid and Novel All\u2010Soft Suture Anchors for Glenoid Labral Repair"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Augustus D.","family":"Mazzocca","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Connecticut Farmington Connecticut U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Chowaniec","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Connecticut Farmington Connecticut U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark P.","family":"Cote","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Connecticut Farmington Connecticut U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joel","family":"Fierra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Connecticut Farmington Connecticut U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Apostolakos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Connecticut Farmington Connecticut U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Nowak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Connecticut Farmington Connecticut U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert A.","family":"Arciero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Connecticut Farmington Connecticut U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Knut","family":"Beitzel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Connecticut Farmington Connecticut U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_2_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.03.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.08.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.01.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.12.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.08.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2004.08.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.09.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2009.10.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.10.019"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-007-0445-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(96)90171-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00132-008-1347-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.08.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(00)90037-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(04)00597-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546509359069"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2010.504610"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806311012606?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806311012606?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.10.024","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.10.024","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.10.024","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T09:27:55Z","timestamp":1773566875000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.10.024"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,10]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.10.024"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.10.024","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Biomechanical Evaluation of Classic Solid and Novel All-Soft Suture Anchors for Glenoid Labral Repair","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.10.024","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}