{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T00:41:12Z","timestamp":1790383272073,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,17]],"date-time":"2012-05-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1337212800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,17]],"date-time":"2012-05-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1337212800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,17]],"date-time":"2012-05-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1337212800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,17]],"date-time":"2012-05-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1337212800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007307","name":"Arthrex","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007307","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007307","name":"Arthrex","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007307","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["arthroscopyjournal.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare tendon\u2010bone interface motion and cyclic loading in a single\u2010row, triple\u2010loaded anchor repair with a suture\u2010tape, rip\u2010stop, double\u2010row rotator cuff repair.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Using 18 human shoulders from 9 matched cadaveric pairs, we created 2 groups of rotator cuff repairs. Group 1 was a double\u2010row, rip\u2010stop, suture\u2010tape construct. Group 2 was a single\u2010row, triple\u2010loaded construct. Before mechanical testing, the supraspinatus footprint was measured with calipers. A superiorly positioned digital camera optically measured the tendon footprint motion during 60\u00b0 of humeral internal and external rotation. Specimens were secured at a fixed angle not exceeding 45\u00b0 in reference to the load. After preloading, each sample was cycled between 10 N and 100 N for 200 cycles at 1 Hz, followed by destructive testing at 33 mm\/s. A digital camera with tracking software measured the repair displacement at 100 and 200 cycles. Ultimate load and failure mode for each sample were recorded.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The exposed anterior footprint border (6.5% \u00b1 6%) and posterior footprint border (0.9% \u00b1 1.7%) in group 1 were statistically less than the exposed anterior footprint border (30.3% \u00b1 17%) and posterior footprint border (29.8% \u00b1 14%) in group 2 (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .003 and\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .001, respectively). The maximal internal rotation and external rotation tendon footprint displacements in group 1 (1.6 mm and 1.4 mm, respectively) were less than those in group 2 (both 3.6 mm) (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .007 and\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .004, respectively). Mean displacement after 100 cycles for group 1 and group 2 was 2.0 mm and 3.2 mm, respectively, and at 200 cycles, mean displacement was 2.5 mm and 4.2 mm, respectively (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .02). The mean ultimate failure load in group 1 (586 N) was greater than that in group 2 (393 N) (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .02). The suture\u2010tendon interface was the site of most construct failures.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The suture\u2010tape, rip\u2010stop, double\u2010row rotator cuff repair had greater footprint coverage, less rotational footprint displacement, and a greater mean ultimate failure load than the triple\u2010loaded, single\u2010row repair on mechanical testing. No double\u2010row or single\u2010row constructs showed 5 mm of displacement after the first 100 cycles. The most common failure mode for both constructs was suture tearing through the tendon.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Differences in cuff fixation influence rotational tendon movement and may influence postoperative healing. Stronger repair constructs still fail at the suture\u2010tendon interface.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.02.015","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,15]],"date-time":"2012-05-15T03:03:14Z","timestamp":1337050994000},"page":"1197-1205","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":67,"title":["A Biomechanical Comparison of Tendon\u2010Bone Interface Motion and Cyclic Loading Between Single\u2010Row, Triple\u2010Loaded Cuff Repairs and Double\u2010Row, Suture\u2010Tape Cuff Repairs Using Biocomposite Anchors"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"F. Alan","family":"Barber","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Plano Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Spine Center Plano Texas U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Otis R.","family":"Drew","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Plano Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Spine Center Plano Texas U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_2_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.04.074"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.07.023"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546507304139"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505281238"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505279575"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199173070-00004"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200003000-00002"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546507313574"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.11.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.12.021"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_12_1","first-page":"25","article-title":"A novel method to determine suture anchor loading after rotator cuff repair\u2014A study of two double\u2010row techniques","volume":"68","author":"Khoury L.D.","year":"2010","journal-title":"Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200212000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2010.11.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2009.07.019"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2010.03.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.10.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.09.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2006.09.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2006.09.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505278252"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2009.10.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2010.04.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200610000-00002"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2008.06.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2009.12.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546509359063"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546509332506"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(97)90006-2"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806312001260?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806312001260?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.02.015","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.02.015","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.02.015","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T09:12:47Z","timestamp":1773565967000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.02.015"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,17]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.02.015"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.02.015","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A Biomechanical Comparison of Tendon-Bone Interface Motion and Cyclic Loading Between Single-Row, Triple-Loaded Cuff Repairs and Double-Row, Suture-Tape Cuff Repairs Using Biocomposite Anchors","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.02.015","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}