{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,15]],"date-time":"2026-09-15T12:27:27Z","timestamp":1789475247325,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,1]],"date-time":"2014-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1396310400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,1]],"date-time":"2014-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1396310400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"abstract":"\n Purpose<\/jats:title>\n To compare the clinical outcome between the use of knotless sutures versus knot\u2010tying sutures in arthroscopic Bankart repairs.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n Between January 2007 and January 2011, 87 patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with the use of knot\u2010tying suture anchors or knotless suture anchors were evaluated, with 45 patients in the knot\u2010tying suture group and 42 patients in the knotless group. Patients were assigned to either group, with odd\u2010numbered patients going to the knot\u2010tying suture arm and even\u2010numbered patients assigned to the knotless arm. Outcomes included the Constant score, the visual analog scale (VAS) score, patient satisfaction score, and range of motion in forward flexion and external rotation with the arm in adduction. Redislocations or subluxations with the 2 techniques was also studied.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement between the preoperative and postoperative VAS scores and Constant scores. In the knot\u2010tying suture group, the VAS score improved from 2.5 \u00b1 2.3 to 0.7 \u00b1 0.5 (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u00a0<\u00a0.05) and the Constant score improved from 64 \u00b1 7 to 92 \u00b1 10 (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n < .05). In the knotless group, the VAS score improved from 2.8 \u00b1 2.5 to 0.9 \u00b1 0.6 (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n < .05), and the Constant score improved from 62 \u00b1 6 to 89 \u00b1 9 (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n < .05). The patient satisfaction scores were 6.9 and 7.1 for the knot tying and knotless groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the outcomes between the 2 groups. The change in the range of forward flexion and external rotation was also similar in the 2 groups. There was also no difference in recurrence or redislocation rates.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n Both the knot\u2010tying and knotless suture anchors groups showed statistically significant and similar improvement in VAS and Constant scores. Both anchors provided reasonable outcomes. The knotless suture anchor is a good alternative to knot\u2010tying suture anchors so that arthroscopic Bankart repairs can be performed without knot tying.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Level of Evidence<\/jats:title>\n Level II, prospective comparative study.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.01.005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,26]],"date-time":"2014-03-26T16:22:34Z","timestamp":1395850954000},"page":"422-427","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":57,"title":["Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using Knot\u2010Tying Versus Knotless Suture Anchors: Is There a Difference?"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Dennis Zhaowen","family":"Ng","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery National University of Singapore National University Hospital Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"V. Prem","family":"Kumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery National University of Singapore National University Hospital Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,4,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197860010-00001"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_3_2","first-page":"182","article-title":"Effectiveness of arthroscopic versus open surgical stabilization for the management of traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability","volume":"5","author":"Ng C.","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Evid Based Healthc"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.03.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_5_2","first-page":"2","article-title":"The results of arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder using the knotless anchor system","volume":"1","author":"Cooke S.J.","year":"2009","journal-title":"Sports Med Arthrosc Rehab Ther Technol"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505283267"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546504268037"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546504265264"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.05.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200109000-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546512446676"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2002.30008"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2004.03.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.07.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-009-0811-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2004.08.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465020300021601"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200007000-00011"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200308000-00012"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.08.033"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806314000693?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806314000693?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.01.005","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.01.005","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.01.005","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T08:47:02Z","timestamp":1773564422000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.01.005"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.01.005"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.01.005","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,4]]}}}