{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,2]],"date-time":"2026-07-02T15:10:31Z","timestamp":1783005031141,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,18]],"date-time":"2014-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1410998400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,18]],"date-time":"2014-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1410998400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,18]],"date-time":"2014-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1410998400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["arthroscopyjournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The purpose of this study was to compare arthroscopic versus open examination of the proximal long head of the biceps tendon (LHB) in patients undergoing open, subpectoral tenodesis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Eighty consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled, of whom 62 were included in the study. During arthroscopy, the most distal extent of the LHB visualized was marked with a Bovie device. The tendon was pulled into the joint with an arthroscopic grasper, showing additional LHB and was again marked with the device. LHB fraying, flattening, redness, and degeneration were graded as absent, mild, moderate, or severe. During open subpectoral tenodesis, the grossly visualized LHB was graded in the same manner and the locations of both marks plus the total length of the LHB observed during open visualization were measured and recorded. After subpectoral tenodesis, the excised portion of the LHB was histologically graded as normal, fibrosis\/tendinosis, or inflamed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      On average, during open tenodesis, 95\u00a0mm (range, 75 to 130\u00a0mm) of LHB was visualized. This was greater than the length visualized during diagnostic arthroscopy of 16\u00a0mm (range, 5 to 28\u00a0mm), or 17%, and the length visualized while pulling the tendon into the joint with an arthroscopic grasper of 30\u00a0mm (range, 15 to 45\u00a0mm), or 32%. The difference in LHB length observed during open versus arthroscopic examination with a grasper was statistically significant (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .0001). In addition, when compared with LHB pathology observed in an open manner, arthroscopic visualization showed only 67% of pathology, underestimated noted pathology in 56% of patients, and overestimated noted pathology in 11% of patients. Histologic evaluation showed fibrosis\/tendinosis in 100% of cases but inflammation in only 5%.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>When compared with open inspection during subpectoral tenodesis, arthroscopic examination of the LHB visualizes only 32% of the tendon and may underestimate pathology.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Level II, diagnostic study\u2014development of diagnostic criteria based on consecutive patients with universally applied gold standard.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.07.025","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,18]],"date-time":"2014-09-18T12:55:07Z","timestamp":1411044907000},"page":"29-34","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":77,"title":["Arthroscopic Versus Open Comparison of Long Head of\u00a0Biceps\u00a0Tendon Visualization and Pathology in Patients Requiring Tenodesis"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"31","author":[{"given":"Brian B.","family":"Gilmer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Taos Orthopaedic Institute Taos New Mexico U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ariana M.","family":"DeMers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sonora Regional Medical Center Sonora California U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dolores","family":"Guerrero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Independent Researcher Biomedical Statistics Seattle Washington U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"suffix":"III","given":"John B.","family":"Reid","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Taos Orthopaedic Institute Taos New Mexico U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James H.","family":"Lubowitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Taos Orthopaedic Institute Taos New Mexico U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dan","family":"Guttmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Taos Orthopaedic Institute Taos New Mexico U.S.A."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.L.00221"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200708000-00025"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2001.24852"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00776-012-0346-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000328880"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_7_2","unstructured":"Zhang Q Zhou J Ge H Cheng B. Tenotomy or tenodesis for long head biceps lesions in shoulders with reparable rotator cuff tears: A prospective randomised trial.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscin press available online 5 July 2013.doi:10.1007\/s00167\u2010013\u20102587\u20108."},{"key":"e_1_2_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546508322179"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-13-205"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.12.030"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546508318192"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/JSA.0b013e3181824edf"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0030-5898(03)00093-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/JSA.0b013e3181824efd"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eats.2012.12.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eats.2012.11.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4085\/1062-6050-48.3.14"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjsm.2007.038406"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2008.04.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2011.07.016"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-201011000-00002"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.06.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/0973-6042.96993"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mse.2000.108386"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2012.04.143"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1058-2746(05)80035-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2013.02.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2008.05.044"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546513482297"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806314006550?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806314006550?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.07.025","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.07.025","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.07.025","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T09:22:59Z","timestamp":1773566579000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.07.025"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,18]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.07.025"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.07.025","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Arthroscopic Versus Open Comparison of Long Head of\u00a0Biceps\u00a0Tendon Visualization and Pathology in Patients Requiring Tenodesis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.07.025","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}