{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T01:10:12Z","timestamp":1792631412266,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,15]],"date-time":"2015-09-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1442275200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,15]],"date-time":"2015-09-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1442275200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,15]],"date-time":"2015-09-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1442275200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","arthroscopyjournal.org","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To quantify and compare the footprint contact area and interface pressure on the greater tuberosity between knotless and knot\u2010tying transosseous\u2010equivalent (TOE) repair using pressure\u2010sensitive film.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We used 11 pairs of fresh\u2010frozen cadaveric shoulders (22 specimens), in which rotator cuff tears were created before repair. Each pair was randomized to either conventional medial knot\u2010tying TOE repair (group A) or medial knotless TOE repair using the modified Mason\u2010Allen technique (group B). Pressure\u2010sensitive film was used to quantify the pressurized contact area and interface pressure between the greater tuberosity and supraspinatus tendon.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The mean pressurized contact area was 33.2 \u00b1 2.5 mm\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      for group A and 28.4 \u00b1 2.4 mm\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      for group B. There was a significant difference between groups (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a0.005). Although the overall contact configuration of both groups was similar and showed an M shape, group A showed a greater pressurized configuration around the medial row. The mean interface pressure was 0.20 \u00b1 0.02 MPa\u00a0for group A and 0.17 \u00b1 0.02 MPa for group B. There was a significant difference between groups (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a0.001).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Contrary to our hypothesis, in this time\u2010zero study, medial knotless TOE repair using a modified Mason\u2010Allen suture produced a significantly inferior footprint contact area and interface pressure compared with conventional medial knot\u2010tying TOE repair.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Even though we found a statistically significant difference between the 2 repair methods, it is still unknown if this statistical difference seen in our study has any clinical and radiologic significance.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2015.07.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,15]],"date-time":"2015-09-15T04:13:33Z","timestamp":1442290413000},"page":"7-12","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["Footprint Contact Area and Interface Pressure Comparison Between the Knotless and Knot\u2010Tying Transosseous\u2010Equivalent Technique for Rotator Cuff\u00a0Repair"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Sung\u2010Jae","family":"Kim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute Severance Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sung\u2010Hwan","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute Severance Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hyun\u2010Soo","family":"Moon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute Severance Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yong\u2010Min","family":"Chun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute Severance Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546510397171"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546509350081"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546507313574"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546512468278"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546512459170"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546509359063"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2006.09.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2006.09.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505278256"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546507312640"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2010.02.035"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2010.09.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.03.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.76B3.8175836"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2013.03.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.07.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546514521577"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806315006258?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806315006258?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2015.07.004","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2015.07.004","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2015.07.004","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T09:25:31Z","timestamp":1773566731000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2015.07.004"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,15]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2015.07.004"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2015.07.004","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Footprint Contact Area and Interface Pressure Comparison Between the Knotless and Knot-Tying Transosseous-Equivalent Technique for Rotator Cuff\u00a0Repair","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2015.07.004","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}