{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,31]],"date-time":"2026-08-31T05:29:21Z","timestamp":1788154161291,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":7,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,1]],"date-time":"2018-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1519862400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,1]],"date-time":"2018-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1519862400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,1]],"date-time":"2018-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1519862400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","arthroscopyjournal.org","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.com.au","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Septic arthritis is a rare but potentially devastating complication after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Studies examining surgical treatment options including graft retention and removal are largely inconclusive. Although the literature indicated that 43.8% of patients who have the graft removed later go on to have a revision ACL reconstruction compared with only 6.5% among those whose graft is retained, this expected\u2010value decision analysis found removal to be the optimal treatment for patients with septic arthritis after ACL reconstruction. This is largely based on patient preference to avoid a late reoperation for residual knee infection. These findings support the concept of utility when considering treatment options for patients with a septic knee. For some, avoiding a late reoperation for a persistent infection is the most important factor and as such graft removal may be the most appropriate treatment to produce a positive outcome among these patients despite the fact that currently, an attempt at graft retention could represent the generally preferred treatment option among practicing surgeons.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.12.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,1]],"date-time":"2018-03-01T03:09:22Z","timestamp":1519873762000},"page":"976-978","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["<i>Editorial Commentary:<\/i>\n                    Graft Removal Versus Retention for Septic Arthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Accounting for Patient Preference Flips the Script on Current Practice"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Mark P.","family":"Cote","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.08.246"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.02.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.10.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-013-2648-z"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(98)70098-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.01.055"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2016.11.018"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806317314809?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806317314809?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.12.001","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.12.001","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.12.001","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T09:06:55Z","timestamp":1773565615000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.12.001"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"references-count":7,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.12.001"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.12.001","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Editorial Commentary: Graft Removal Versus Retention for Septic Arthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Accounting for Patient Preference Flips the Script on Current Practice","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.12.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2017.08.246","name":"associatedlink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to the associated document"},{"value":"simple-article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the Arthroscopy Association of North America","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}