{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T02:34:13Z","timestamp":1791426853148,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,11]],"date-time":"2019-11-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1573430400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,11]],"date-time":"2019-11-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1573430400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,11]],"date-time":"2019-11-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1573430400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,11]],"date-time":"2019-11-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1573430400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["arthroscopyjournal.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the viscoelastic properties of 4 commercially available cord\u2010like sutures and 2 commercially available suture tapes when subjected to physiological loads, as well as to compare them with each other and to identify the clinically most desirable combination of suture material properties.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Six suture materials (Ethibond, FiberWire, FiberTape, Orthocord, Ultrabraid, and Ultratape) underwent creep testing (n\u00a0= 7, 60 N, 10 minutes) to determine specimen stiffness, initial elongation at 60 N of load, static creep (during 10 minutes of loading), and relaxed elongation (material recovery 3 minutes after removal of load). Furthermore, cyclic testing (n\u00a0= 7, 10\u201045 N, 0.5 Hz, 500 cycles) was carried out to determine dynamic creep, peak\u2010to\u2010peak displacement, and relaxed elongation. Mechanical testing was conducted on a material testing machine in 37\u00b0C phosphate\u2010buffered saline solution.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      FiberTape showed the greatest stiffness (23.9 \u00b1 3.2 N\/mm,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .001), the smallest amounts of static (0.38 \u00b1 0.10 mm,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .001) and dynamic (0.16 \u00b1 0.09 mm,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0= .003) creep, and the smallest peak\u2010to\u2010peak displacement (0.20 \u00b1 0.02 mm,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .001). FiberTape and FiberWire showed the smallest initial elongation (1.17 \u00b1 0.17 mm and 1.63 \u00b1 0.25 mm, respectively;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0&lt;\u00a0.001). Ultrabraid showed the greatest relaxed elongation, both statically (4.73 \u00b1 0.73 mm,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .001) and dynamically (4.18 \u00b1 0.83 mm,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .002).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>FiberTape consistently displayed less creep, greater stiffness, and less extensibility than the other suture types. Ultrabraid showed the largest amount of relaxed elongation on both static and dynamic testing.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>When considering high stiffness in combination with low initial extension and low static creep to be ideal parameters to achieve optimal initial construct stability and considering low dynamic creep in combination with low peak\u2010to\u2010peak displacement to be ideal conditions for the repetitive loading of the construct during the healing process, tapes seem to be superior to cord\u2010like sutures for performing rotator cuff repair.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.08.048","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,11]],"date-time":"2019-11-11T10:40:46Z","timestamp":1573468846000},"page":"708-713","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":40,"title":["A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Suture Materials Used for Arthroscopic Shoulder Procedures"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Mohy E.","family":"Taha","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery Basel University Hospital Basel Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kerstin","family":"Schneider","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics Schulthess Clinic Zurich Zurich Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth C.","family":"Clarke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sydney Medical School Sydney Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David E.","family":"O\u2019Briain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Service University Hospital Waterford Waterford Ireland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Margaret M.","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Raymond Purves Research Labs University of Sydney Sydney Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gregory","family":"Cunningham","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Shoulder Center Hirslanden Clinique la Colline Geneva Switzerland"},{"name":"Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Benjamin","family":"Cass","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sydney Shoulder Research Institute Sydney Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Allan A.","family":"Young","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sydney Shoulder Research Institute Sydney Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbo.2016.05.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.K.00117"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5312\/wjo.v6.i2.211"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2325967117701212"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jos.2016.07.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.01.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2016.07.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/2046-3758.62.BJR-2016-0225.R1"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546509332816"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2014.05.030"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2016.05.023"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546515594449"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5312\/wjo.v6.i11.902"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546510382835"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2018.10.140"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.00697"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2018.09.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2008.12.021"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.74B4.1624521"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S074980631930790X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S074980631930790X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.08.048","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.08.048","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.08.048","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T08:48:39Z","timestamp":1773564519000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.08.048"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,11]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.08.048"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.08.048","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Suture Materials Used for Arthroscopic Shoulder Procedures","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.08.048","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}