{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T22:03:53Z","timestamp":1790805833343,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]],"date-time":"2021-10-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635206400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]],"date-time":"2021-10-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635206400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]],"date-time":"2021-10-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635206400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]],"date-time":"2021-10-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635206400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["arthroscopyjournal.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This retrospective study aimed to compare the effects of 2 different anchoring placements on glenoid rim erosion after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Shoulders that underwent ABR from January 2013 to July 2020 were divided into 2 groups according to anchor placement (on\u2010the\u2010face, group F; on\u2010the\u2010edge, group E). We retrospectively calculated the percent change of glenoid width (\u0394) on the first postoperative computed tomography scan (CT; performed within 6 months) and second postoperative CT (performed at 6 to 12 months) relative to the width on the preoperative CT and compared percent changes between the 2 groups. Also, we investigated the influence of preoperative glenoid structures (normal, erosion, bony Bankart) and the postoperative recurrence rate.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We examined 225 shoulders in 214 patients (group F, n\u00a0= 151; group E, n\u00a0= 74). At first CT, anchoring placement was significantly associated with postoperative decrease of glenoid width (group F,\u00a0\u22127.6% \u00b1 7.9%; group E,\u00a0\u22120.1% \u00b1 9.7%;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .0001). The difference between groups F and E was significant in shoulders with a preoperative glenoid defect (bony Bankart,\u00a0\u22126.6%\u00a0\u00b1 8.8% vs 2.5% \u00b1 11.2%, respectively;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt; .0001; erosion,\u00a0\u22126.6% \u00b1 6.2% vs\u00a0\u22122.6% \u00b1 5.3%, respectively;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0= .03). In\u00a0112 shoulders, CT was performed twice; \u0394 was\u00a0\u22126.9% \u00b1 7.3% in group F (n\u00a0= 64) and\u00a0\u22121.7%\u00a0\u00b1\u00a010.1% in group E (n\u00a0= 48;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0= .005) at the first CT and\u00a0\u22123.2% \u00b1 10.0% and 1.0% \u00b1 10.6% (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0= .10), respectively, at the second CT, indicating recovery of glenoid width in both groups. The postoperative recurrence rate in patients with at least 2 years\u2019 follow\u2010up was 14.7% in group F and 14.6% in group E.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In the early stage after ABR, on\u2010the\u2010edge glenoid anchor placement was associated with less glenoid rim erosion than on\u2010the\u2010face anchor placement.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Level III, retrospective comparative trial.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2021.10.013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,28]],"date-time":"2021-10-28T22:22:07Z","timestamp":1635459727000},"page":"1099-1107","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["On\u2010the\u2010Edge Anchor Placement May Be Protective Against Glenoid Rim Erosion After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Compared to On\u2010the\u2010Face Anchor Placement"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Takehito","family":"Hirose","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shigeto","family":"Nakagawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Yukioka Hospital Osaka"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ryohei","family":"Uchida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Kansai Rosai Hospital Hyogo"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hiroyuki","family":"Yokoi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Yukioka Hospital Osaka"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tomoki","family":"Ohori","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Yukioka Hospital Osaka"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Makoto","family":"Tanaka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Sports Medicine Daini Osaka Police Hospital Osaka Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wataru","family":"Sahara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tatsuo","family":"Mae","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465980260012301"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2325967117726494"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2000.17715"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200001000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546515571555"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.01033"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546517700864"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_9_2","first-page":"539","article-title":"Glenoid width changes after arthroscopic Bankart repair","volume":"40","author":"Sugawa K.","year":"2016","journal-title":"Shoulder Joint"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.07.019"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_11_2","first-page":"32","article-title":"Glenoid rim morphological changes after arthroscopic Bankart repair","volume":"44","author":"Nishimoto R.","year":"2020","journal-title":"Shoulder Joint"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_12_2","first-page":"857","article-title":"Morphological changes in glenoid after arthroscopic Bankart repair","volume":"40","author":"Yamamoto R.","year":"2017","journal-title":"Shoulder Joint"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_13_2","first-page":"429","article-title":"Anchor insertion depth in recurrent shoulder dislocation and subluxation worsens postoperative anterior glenoid rim morphology","volume":"43","author":"Uchiyama Y.","year":"2019","journal-title":"Shoulder Joint"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_14_2","first-page":"858","article-title":"Relationship between anterior glenoid rim erosion and clinical outcome after arthroscopic Bankart repair","volume":"41","author":"Sakai T.","year":"2017","journal-title":"Shoulder Joint"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2020.04.023"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2010.07.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200305000-00016"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546518785968"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_19_2","volume-title":"Burkhart's view of the shoulder: A cowboy's guide to advanced shoulder arthroscopy","author":"Burkhart S.S.","year":"2006"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2020.11.042"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2009.03.022"},{"key":"e_1_2_3_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546511399863"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806321009221?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806321009221?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2021.10.013","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2021.10.013","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2021.10.013","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T09:29:36Z","timestamp":1773566976000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2021.10.013"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2021.10.013"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2021.10.013","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"On-the-Edge Anchor Placement May Be Protective Against Glenoid Rim Erosion After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Compared to On-the-Face Anchor Placement","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2021.10.013","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}