{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T10:40:06Z","timestamp":1773571206948,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]],"date-time":"2022-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664582400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]],"date-time":"2022-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664582400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]],"date-time":"2022-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664582400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]],"date-time":"2022-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664582400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["arthroscopyjournal.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Anterior glenohumeral instability has an incidence of 21.9 individuals per 100,000 in the general population. When recurrent instability occurs, bone loss to the anteroinferior glenoid can occur. The concept of \u201con\u2010track\u201d and \u201coff\u2010track\u201d Hill\u2013Sachs lesions is significant in cases of bipolar bone loss, because if humeral\u2010sided bony injury also requires treatment, a remplissage combined with arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) may be an alternative to a Latarjet procedure. The Latarjet often is touted as a \u201cdefinitive,\u201d because it adds bone to increase the glenoid surface area that the humeral head must travel to dislocate, and adds the dynamic \u201csling effect\u201d of the conjoint tendon to further tension the lower part of the subscapularis in abduction and reduce anterior\u2010directed forces. However, compared with ABR plus remplissage, Latarjet shows a greater risk of complications: as high as a 7.37 times relative risk. As an evidence\u2010based surgeon who believes in the power of soft\u2010tissue repair plus ABR, I prefer to avoid the increased complication risks of a primary Latarjet when possible. Also, my patients describe the postoperative shoulder as feeling more like the contralateral, unaffected shoulder after ABR than Latarjet.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.04.005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,30]],"date-time":"2022-09-30T02:59:15Z","timestamp":1664506755000},"page":"2806-2808","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["<i>Editorial Commentary<\/i>\n                    : Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage, Irrespective of Glenoid Bone Loss, May Be Advantageous Over Latarjet: Don\u2019t Widen the Lane, Just Fill in the Pothole!"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Bryan M.","family":"Saltzman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Charlotte North Carolina U.S.A."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2017.09.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200908000-00002"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.G.00070"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2000.17715"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2013.10.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2012.09.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2020.04.032"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/23259671211062573"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.03.031"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-20-00202"},{"key":"e_1_2_2_12_2","first-page":"1","article-title":"A\u00a0pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing Bankart repair and Remplissage with the Latarjet procedure in patients with subcritical bone loss (STABLE): Study protocol","volume":"8","author":"Khan M.","year":"2022","journal-title":"Pilot Feasibility Studies"}],"container-title":["Arthroscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806322002377?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0749806322002377?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.04.005","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.04.005","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.04.005","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T09:16:44Z","timestamp":1773566204000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/arthroscopyjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.04.005"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.04.005"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.04.005","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0749-8063","1526-3231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0749-8063","type":"print"},{"value":"1526-3231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage, Irrespective of Glenoid Bone Loss, May Be Advantageous Over Latarjet: Don\u2019t Widen the Lane, Just Fill in the Pothole!","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.04.005","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"simple-article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}