{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T00:02:17Z","timestamp":1790640137508,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":71,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790812800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790812800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785369600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["australiancriticalcare.com","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Australian Critical Care"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,31]],"date-time":"2026-08-31T19:31:55Z","timestamp":1788204715000},"page":"101674","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Developing and evaluating measurement instruments for intensive and high-acuity care: A practical six-step guide aligned with international measurement standards"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"39","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6064-3575","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael J.","family":"Ireland","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sakuni A.","family":"Weerasinghe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3029-0470","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rohan","family":"De Pallant","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7692-403X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrea P.","family":"Marshall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1147","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-018-1798-3","article-title":"COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures","volume":"27","author":"Prinsen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib2","series-title":"American psychological association, national council on measurement in education,. Standards for educational and psychological testing","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib3","series-title":"Measurement in medicine: a practical guide","author":"de Vet","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib4","series-title":"Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use","first-page":"415","author":"Streiner","year":"2024"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E3","DOI":"10.1530\/EJE-20-0550","article-title":"Measurement error in clinical research, yes it matters","volume":"183","author":"Groenwold","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Endocrinol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1525-1497.2003.20147.x","article-title":"Measuring errors and adverse events in health care","volume":"18","author":"Thomas","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1956","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2022.05.025","article-title":"Measurement error and misclassification in orthopedics: when study subjects are categorized in the wrong exposure or outcome groups","volume":"37","author":"Zaniletti","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2016.08.014","article-title":"A systematic review finds limited data on measurement properties of instruments measuring outcomes in adult intensive care unit survivors","volume":"82","author":"Robinson","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0000000000001651","article-title":"Outcome measurement in ICU survivorship research from 1970 to 2013: a scoping review of 425 publications","volume":"44","author":"Turnbull","year":"2016","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib10","article-title":"Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims [internet]. Rockville, MD: U.S. department of health and human services","year":"2009","journal-title":"Food and Drug Administration"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2929","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-024-03761-6","article-title":"COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0","volume":"33","author":"Mokkink","year":"2024","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-018-1829-0","article-title":"COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study","volume":"27","author":"Terwee","year":"2018","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-020-01179-5","article-title":"COSMIN risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study","volume":"20","author":"Mokkink","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0000000000000273","article-title":"Patient-focused drug development: a new direction for collaboration","volume":"53","author":"Perfetto","year":"2015","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x","article-title":"Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO good research practices task force report","volume":"12","author":"Coons","year":"2009","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2014.06.005","article-title":"PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes: report of the ISPOR PRO mixed modes good research practices task force","volume":"17","author":"Eremenco","year":"2014","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2011.06.014","article-title":"Content validity\u2014establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1\u2014Eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument","volume":"14","author":"Patrick","year":"2011","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2015.08.006","article-title":"Clinical outcome assessments: Conceptual foundation\u2014report of the ISPOR clinical outcomes assessment \u2013 emerging good practices for outcomes research task force","volume":"18","author":"Walton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2016.11.005","article-title":"Clinician-reported outcome assessments of treatment benefit: report of the ISPOR clinical outcome assessment emerging good practices task force","volume":"20","author":"Powers","year":"2017","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"n71","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib20","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-016-1555-2","article-title":"How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a \u201cCore Outcome Set\u201d - a practical guideline","volume":"17","author":"Prinsen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x","article-title":"Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation","volume":"8","author":"Wild","year":"2005","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1037\/h0040957","article-title":"Construct validity in psychological tests","volume":"52","author":"Cronbach","year":"1955","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1186\/s13054-025-05431-6","article-title":"Reliability of pre-admission patient-reported outcome measures postoperatively assessed via proxies: a prospective, multicenter observational study","volume":"29","author":"Grunow","year":"2025","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1037\/1040-3590.6.4.284","article-title":"Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology","volume":"6","author":"Cicchetti","year":"1994","journal-title":"Psychol Assess"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012","article-title":"A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research","volume":"15","author":"Koo","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Chiropract Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0068967","article-title":"Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: let's learn from cows in the rain","volume":"8","author":"Sonderen","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.7334\/psicothema2018.33","article-title":"Using reversed items in likert scales: a questionable practice","volume":"30","author":"Su\u00e1rez-\u00c1lvarez","year":"2018","journal-title":"Psicothema"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1509\/jmr.11.0368","article-title":"Misresponse to reversed and negated items in surveys: a review","volume":"49","author":"Weijters","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Mark Res"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-106109","article-title":"Psychometric evaluations of the hospital survey on patient safety culture version 2.0 in Ethiopia (E-HSoPSC 2.0): a cross-sectional study","volume":"15","author":"Fekadu","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib31","series-title":"Handbook of survey research [internet]","first-page":"263","article-title":"Question and questionnaire design","author":"Krosnick","year":"2010"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib32","first-page":"73","article-title":"Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales","volume":"4","author":"Lozano","year":"2008","journal-title":"Methodol Eur J Res Meth Behav Soc Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1080\/13689880500178849","article-title":"One size doesn't fit all: selecting response scales for attitude items","volume":"15","author":"Johns","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Elections, Public Opin Parties"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1177\/0049124112452527","article-title":"Middle alternatives revisited: how the neither\/nor response acts as a way of saying \u201cI Don't Know\u201d","volume":"43","author":"Sturgis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Socio Methods Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1097\/00006199-198611000-00017","article-title":"Determination and quantification of content validity","volume":"35","author":"Lynn","year":"1986","journal-title":"Nurs Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1002\/nur.20147","article-title":"The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations","volume":"29","author":"Polit","year":"2006","journal-title":"Res Nurs Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2020.08.008","article-title":"The development and psychometric evaluation of the clinicians' attitudes towards responding and escalating care of deteriorating patients scale","volume":"34","author":"Chua","year":"2021","journal-title":"Aust Crit Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1008","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x","article-title":"Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique","volume":"32","author":"Hasson","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib39","series-title":"Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design","author":"Willis","year":"2005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib40","series-title":"Psychometric theory","first-page":"786","author":"Nunnally","year":"1994"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib41","series-title":"Educational measurement","first-page":"13","article-title":"Validity","author":"Messick","year":"1989"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530","article-title":"Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world","volume":"60","author":"Graham","year":"2009","journal-title":"Annu Rev Psychol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.7.2.147","article-title":"Missing data: our view of the state of the art","volume":"7","author":"Schafer","year":"2002","journal-title":"Psychol Methods"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1177\/0018726708094863","article-title":"Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research","volume":"61","author":"Baruch","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Relat"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1053\/jcrc.2001.30163","article-title":"Kingston general hospital ICU research working group. Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: the development of a questionnaire and preliminary results","volume":"16","author":"Heyland","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Crit Care"},{"issue":"19\u201320","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib46","first-page":"3501","article-title":"Systematic review of methods for patient-reported outcome measurement in the intensive care unit","volume":"27","author":"Kj\u00f8nevold","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib47","series-title":"Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method","author":"Dillman","year":"2014"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010","article-title":"The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies","volume":"147","author":"von","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib49","article-title":"Best practices for nonresponse bias reporting","author":"Madans","year":"2023","journal-title":"Federal Comm Statist Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib50","series-title":"Survey methodology [internet]","first-page":"496","author":"Groves","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib51","series-title":"Designing clinical research","first-page":"381","author":"Hulley","year":"2013"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/0021-9681(79)90087-0","article-title":"Adjusting for losses to follow-up in sample size determination for cohort studies","volume":"32","author":"Palta","year":"1979","journal-title":"J Chron Dis"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1093\/poq\/nfl033","article-title":"Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys","volume":"70","author":"Groves","year":"2006","journal-title":"Public Opin Q"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2023.01.001","article-title":"Updated recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement comparability among modes of data collection for patient-reported outcome measures: a good practices report of an ISPOR task force","volume":"26","author":"O'Donohoe","year":"2023","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2017.07.002","article-title":"Standards for instrument migration when implementing paper patient-reported outcome instruments electronically: recommendations from a qualitative synthesis of cognitive interview and usability studies","volume":"21","author":"Muehlhausen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-010-9606-8","article-title":"The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study","volume":"19","author":"Mokkink","year":"2010","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-007953","article-title":"Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol","volume":"5","author":"Johnston","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-023-02157-3","article-title":"The anchor design of anchor-based method to determine the minimal clinically important difference: a systematic review","volume":"21","author":"Zhang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcome"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-10-22","article-title":"The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content","volume":"10","author":"Mokkink","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2025.101510","volume":"39","author":"L\u00f3pez-L\u00f3pez","year":"2026","journal-title":"Aust Crit Care"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1080\/10705510701301834","article-title":"Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance","volume":"14","author":"Chen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Struct Equ Model: A Multidiscip J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1207\/S15328007SEM0902_5","article-title":"Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance","volume":"9","author":"Cheung","year":"2002","journal-title":"Struct Equ Model: A Multidiscip J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2016.12.015","article-title":"The anchor-based minimal important change, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis or predictive modeling, may need to be adjusted for the proportion of improved patients","volume":"83","author":"Terluin","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e151","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0000000000006516","article-title":"The psychometric properties of the EuroQol 5D five level in survivors of critical illness","volume":"53","author":"De Silva","year":"2025","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib65","first-page":"1","article-title":"Estimating ordinal reliability for likert-type and ordinal item response data: a conceptual, empirical, and practical guide","volume":"17","author":"Gadermann","year":"2012","journal-title":"Practical Assess Res Eval"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012","article-title":"Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires","volume":"60","author":"Terwee","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(93)90018-V","article-title":"Bias, prevalence and kappa","volume":"46","author":"Byrt","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(90)90158-L","article-title":"High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes","volume":"43","author":"Feinstein","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2012.031","article-title":"Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic","volume":"22","author":"McHugh","year":"2012","journal-title":"Biochem Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2020.09.005","article-title":"The clinical utility of the pain assessment tool in ventilated, sedated, and muscle-relaxed neonates","volume":"34","author":"Devsam","year":"2021","journal-title":"Aust Crit Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2013.04.002","article-title":"Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data-recommendations for clinical trial teams: report of the ISPOR ePRO systems validation good research practices task force","volume":"16","author":"Zbrozek","year":"2013","journal-title":"Value Health"}],"container-title":["Australian Critical Care"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S103673142600144X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S103673142600144X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T23:34:59Z","timestamp":1790638499000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S103673142600144X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"references-count":71,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S103673142600144X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674","relation":{},"ISSN":["1036-7314"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1036-7314","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Developing and evaluating measurement instruments for intensive and high-acuity care: A practical six-step guide aligned with international measurement standards","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Australian Critical Care","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.aucc.2026.101674","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"101674"}}