{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T20:21:01Z","timestamp":1790713261008,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":117,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,1]],"date-time":"2016-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1480550400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100007953","name":"Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100007953","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Spine Society of Europe (EUROSPINE)"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","bprclinrheum.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,23]],"date-time":"2017-07-23T07:45:39Z","timestamp":1500795939000},"page":"1003-1020","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":91,"title":["Choosing the right outcome measurement instruments for patients with low back pain"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Alessandro","family":"Chiarotto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Caroline B.","family":"Terwee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Raymond W.","family":"Ostelo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S54","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d","article-title":"Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain","volume":"36","author":"Chapman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000149184.16509.73","article-title":"Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess?: a systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires","volume":"30","author":"Grotle","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-016-0188-6","article-title":"Core outcome sets and systematic reviews","volume":"5","author":"Clarke","year":"2016","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001666","article-title":"Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials","volume":"11","author":"Dwan","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-8-39","article-title":"Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews","volume":"8","author":"Clarke","year":"2007","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.11.013","article-title":"Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0","volume":"67","author":"Boers","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-13-132","article-title":"Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider","volume":"13","author":"Williamson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjpt.2017.03.001","article-title":"Core outcome sets for research and clinical practice","volume":"21","author":"Chiarotto","year":"2017","journal-title":"Braz J Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-016-1555-2","article-title":"How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a \u201cCore Outcome Set\u201d\u2013a practical guideline","volume":"17","author":"Prinsen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1590\/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143","article-title":"The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument","volume":"20","author":"Mokkink","year":"2016","journal-title":"Braz J Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib11","series-title":"International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF","author":"Organization WH","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib12","article-title":"A\u00a0validated interview schedule for use in population surveys of chronic disease and disability","volume":"25","author":"Garrad","year":"1971","journal-title":"Br J Prev Soc Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1097\/AJP.0b013e318208c8a2","article-title":"Measuring pain self-efficacy","volume":"27","author":"Miles","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin J pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib14","unstructured":"Rehabilitation Measures Database. http:\/\/www.rehabmeasures.org\/."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib15","unstructured":"eProvide Mapi Trust. https:\/\/eprovide.mapi-trust.org\/."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib16","unstructured":"Boers M, Kirwan J, Tugwell P, et\u00a0al. The OMERACT handbook. http:\/\/www.omeract.org\/pdf\/OMERACT_Handbook.pdf2017."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006","article-title":"The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes","volume":"63","author":"Mokkink","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-010-9606-8","article-title":"The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study","volume":"19","author":"Mokkink","year":"2010","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-011-9960-1","article-title":"Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist","volume":"21","author":"Terwee","year":"2012","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","article-title":"GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations","volume":"336","author":"Guyatt","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3100","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200012150-00003","article-title":"Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations","volume":"25","author":"Bombardier","year":"2000","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2003","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199809150-00018","article-title":"Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardized use","volume":"23","author":"Deyo","year":"1998","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1660","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001061","article-title":"2015 Updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane back and neck group","volume":"40","author":"Furlan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-15-511","article-title":"A\u00a0core outcome set for clinical trials on non-specific low back pain: study protocol for the development of a core domain set","volume":"15","author":"Chiarotto","year":"2014","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1127","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-3892-3","article-title":"Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain","volume":"24","author":"Chiarotto","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2015.1036696","article-title":"A\u00a0proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain","volume":"86","author":"Clement","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1249","DOI":"10.1111\/pme.12538","article-title":"Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain","volume":"15","author":"Deyo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2003.08.001","article-title":"Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations","volume":"106","author":"Turk","year":"2003","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.3138\/ptc.2015-30","article-title":"Completeness of outcomes description reported in low back pain rehabilitation interventions: a survey of 185 randomized trials","volume":"68","author":"Gianola","year":"2016","journal-title":"Physiother Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0164573","article-title":"A\u00a0systematic review of outcome measures use, analytical approaches, reporting methods, and publication volume by year in low back pain trials published between 1980 and 2012: respice, adspice, et prospice","volume":"11","author":"Froud","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198303000-00004","article-title":"A\u00a0study of the natural history of back pain: part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain","volume":"8","author":"Roland","year":"1983","journal-title":"spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3186","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200012150-00014","article-title":"Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures","volume":"25","author":"Beaton","year":"2000","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-015-0534-1","article-title":"Primary outcome measure use in back pain trials may need radical reassessment","volume":"16","author":"Froud","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215510367975","article-title":"Do numerical rating scales and the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire capture changes that are meaningful to patients with persistent back pain?","volume":"24","author":"Hush","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S158","DOI":"10.1002\/acr.20542","volume":"63","author":"Smeets","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arthritis Care Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2012.06.024","article-title":"Meta-analysis identifies back pain questionnaire reliability influenced more by instrument than study design or population","volume":"66","author":"Geere","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1620","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20150420","article-title":"Roland-morris disability questionnaire and Oswestry disability index: which has better measurement properties for measuring physical functioning in nonspecific low back pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"96","author":"Chiarotto","year":"2016","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(96)00526-4","article-title":"The Quebec back pain disability scale: conceptualization and development","volume":"49","author":"Kopec","year":"1996","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1645","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182765a3f","article-title":"Validation of the Arabic version of the quebec back pain disability scale","volume":"37","author":"Alnahhal","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.3233\/BMR-2011-0288","article-title":"Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the quebec back pain disability scale","volume":"24","author":"Christakou","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Back Musculoskelet Rehabilitation"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib41","article-title":"cross-cultural adaption of the German Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: an exposure-specific measurement for back pain patients","volume":"9","author":"Riecke","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0pain Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1816","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20140478","article-title":"Measurement properties of the quebec back pain disability scale in patients with nonspecific low back pain: systematic review","volume":"96","author":"Speksnijder","year":"2016","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/82.1.8","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness","volume":"82","author":"Davidson","year":"2002","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199502000-00016","article-title":"The quebec back pain disability scale: measurement properties","volume":"20","author":"Kopec","year":"1995","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E454","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7","article-title":"The Oswestry disability index, the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire, and the Quebec back pain disability scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions","volume":"31","author":"Mousavi","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1016\/j.berh.2005.03.003","article-title":"Clinically important outcomes in low back pain","volume":"19","author":"Ostelo","year":"2005","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10","article-title":"Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change","volume":"33","author":"Ostelo","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2004.09.012","article-title":"Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations","volume":"113","author":"Dworkin","year":"2005","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-3959(95)00149-2","article-title":"Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments","volume":"65","author":"Beurskens","year":"1996","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29","article-title":"Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain","volume":"30","author":"Childs","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E492","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000143664.02702.0b","article-title":"Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain","volume":"29","author":"Grotle","year":"2004","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2915","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815b75ae","article-title":"Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain","volume":"32","author":"Kovacs","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-7-82","article-title":"Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients","volume":"7","author":"Lauridsen","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1858","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-009-1070-1","article-title":"What is an acceptable outcome of treatment before it begins? Methodological considerations and implications for patients with chronic low back pain","volume":"18","author":"Lauridsen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1484","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1353-6","article-title":"Outcome measures in chronic low back pain","volume":"19","author":"Maughan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03002999","article-title":"Assessing pain and pain-related fear in acute low back pain: what is the smallest detectable change?","volume":"14","author":"Ostelo","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Behav Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200404150-00011","article-title":"Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain","volume":"29","author":"Pengel","year":"2004","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1256","DOI":"10.1111\/pme.12717","article-title":"Barriers to chronic pain measurement: a qualitative study of patient perspectives","volume":"16","author":"Robinson-Papp","year":"2015","journal-title":"Pain Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181657d24","article-title":"Correlation of measures of pain, function, and overall response: results pooled from two identical studies of etoricoxib in chronic low back pain","volume":"33","author":"Sheldon","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000201293.57439.47","article-title":"Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain","volume":"31","author":"van der Roer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2008.03.024","article-title":"The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods","volume":"139","author":"Broderick","year":"2008","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2009.07.029","article-title":"Development and psychometric analysis of the PROMIS pain behavior item bank","volume":"146","author":"Revicki","year":"2009","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199206000-00002","article-title":"The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection","volume":"30","author":"Ware","year":"1992","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199603000-00003","article-title":"A\u00a012-Item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity","volume":"34","author":"Ware","year":"1996","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-3959(99)00103-7","article-title":"Responsiveness of general health status in chronic low back pain: a comparison of the COOP charts and the SF-36","volume":"83","author":"Bronfort","year":"1999","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1359","DOI":"10.1016\/0277-9536(95)00115-N","article-title":"German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 health survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA project","volume":"41","author":"Bullinger","year":"1995","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"815","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000207257.64215.03","article-title":"Responsiveness of objective, disease-specific, and generic outcome measures in patients with chronic low back pain: an assessment for improving, stable, and deteriorating patients","volume":"31","author":"Campbell","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1023034801571","article-title":"Use of the SF-36 health status survey with a chronically disabled back pain population: strengths and limitations","volume":"8","author":"Gatchel","year":"1998","journal-title":"J\u00a0Occup Rehabilitation"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1739","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000083169.58671.96","article-title":"Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain","volume":"28","author":"Luo","year":"2003","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1093\/rheumatology\/39.7.783","article-title":"Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments","volume":"39","author":"Suarez-Almazor","year":"2000","journal-title":"Rheumatology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000062007.95197.08","article-title":"Comparison of the Roland\u2013Morris disability questionnaire and generic health status measures: a population-based study of workers' compensation back injury claimants","volume":"28","author":"Turner","year":"2003","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib72","first-page":"764","article-title":"Measuring the outcome of health resort programs","volume":"33","author":"Weigl","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Rheumatology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/0168-8510(96)00822-6","article-title":"Group E. EuroQol: the current state of play","volume":"37","author":"Brooks","year":"1996","journal-title":"Health policy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199711000-00002","article-title":"Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states","volume":"35","author":"Dolan","year":"1997","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31827ab803","article-title":"Comparison of the EuroQOL-5D with the Oswestry Disability Index, back and leg pain scores in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology","volume":"38","author":"Mueller","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2012.10.030","article-title":"Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain","volume":"12","author":"Soer","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2012.09.003","article-title":"Responsiveness of the EQ-5D health-related quality-of-life instrument in assessing low back pain","volume":"16","author":"Whynes","year":"2013","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1727","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-011-9903-x","article-title":"Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)","volume":"20","author":"Herdman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Qual life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1717","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-012-0322-4","article-title":"Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study","volume":"22","author":"Janssen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mlr.0000135827.18610.0d","article-title":"The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12","volume":"42","author":"Brazier","year":"2004","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib81","series-title":"Work ability index: institute of occupational health helsinki","author":"Tuomi","year":"1994"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-005-1023-2","article-title":"SSE Spine Tango\u2013content, workflow, set-up","volume":"14","author":"R\u00f6der","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1573","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2016.02.004","article-title":"Psychological distress in acute low back pain: a review of measurement scales and levels of distress reported in the first 2 Months after pain onset","volume":"97","author":"Shaw","year":"2016","journal-title":"Archives Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1001\/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004","article-title":"An inventory for measuring depression","volume":"4","author":"Beck","year":"1961","journal-title":"Archives general psychiatry"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib87","series-title":"Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, TX","author":"Beck","year":"1996"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1590\/1516-4446-2012-1048","article-title":"Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory-II: a comprehensive review","volume":"35","author":"Wang","year":"2013","journal-title":"Rev Bras Psiquiatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x","article-title":"The hospital anxiety and depression scale","volume":"67","author":"Zigmond","year":"1983","journal-title":"Acta psychiatr Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3999(01)00296-3","article-title":"The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review","volume":"52","author":"Bjelland","year":"2002","journal-title":"J\u00a0Psychosomatic Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib91","first-page":"1012","article-title":"Validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with acute low back pain","volume":"16","author":"Turk","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2010.04.025","article-title":"Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference","volume":"150","author":"Amtmann","year":"2010","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2015.08.035","article-title":"Evidence from diverse clinical populations supported clinical validity of PROMIS pain interference and pain behavior","volume":"73","author":"Askew","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0000000000000497","article-title":"Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS pain interference short forms, brief pain inventory, PEG, and SF-36 bodily pain subscale","volume":"54","author":"Kean","year":"2016","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib95","first-page":"129","article-title":"Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory","volume":"23","author":"Cleeland","year":"1994","journal-title":"Ann Acad Med Singap"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib96","first-page":"133","article-title":"Validation of the brief pain inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain","volume":"5","author":"Tan","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1097\/00002508-200409000-00005","article-title":"Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain","volume":"20","author":"Bann","year":"2004","journal-title":"Clin J Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-3959(85)90004-1","article-title":"The west haven-yale multidimensional pain inventory (WHYMPI)","volume":"23","author":"Kerns","year":"1985","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"956","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199504150-00014","article-title":"On the utility of the west haven-yale multidimensional pain inventory","volume":"20","author":"Bernstein","year":"1995","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1097\/00002508-199903000-00005","article-title":"Empirical test of the factor structure of the west haven-yale multidimensional pain inventory","volume":"15","author":"Riley","year":"1999","journal-title":"Clin J Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib101","series-title":"Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use","author":"Streiner","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S22","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04","article-title":"Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)","volume":"45","author":"Reeve","year":"2007","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55","article-title":"The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years","volume":"45","author":"Cella","year":"2007","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-009-9560-5","article-title":"Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms","volume":"19","author":"Choi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/ar2890","article-title":"Better assessment of physical function: item improvement is neglected but essential","volume":"11","author":"Bruce","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arthritis Res Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2061","DOI":"10.3899\/jrheum.090358","article-title":"Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing","volume":"36","author":"Fries","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Rheumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.21308","article-title":"Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients","volume":"29","author":"Hung","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Orthop Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000097","article-title":"Psychometric properties of the PROMIS physical function item bank in patients with spinal disorders","volume":"39","author":"Hung","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000059","article-title":"Computerized adaptive testing using the PROMIS physical function item bank reduces test burden with less ceiling effects compared with the short musculoskeletal function assessment in orthopaedic trauma patients","volume":"28","author":"Hung","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-016-0478-7","article-title":"Individuals with knee impairments identify items in need of clarification in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS\u00ae) pain interference and physical function item banks\u2013a qualitative study","volume":"14","author":"Lynch","year":"2016","journal-title":"Health Qual life Outcomes"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.10.024","article-title":"The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency","volume":"67","author":"Rose","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib112","article-title":"Calibration of the PROMIS physical function item bank in Dutch patients with rheumatoid arthritis","volume":"9","author":"Voshaar","year":"2014","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib113","first-page":"2221","article-title":"Validity and measurement precision of the PROMIS physical function item bank and a content validity\u2013driven 20-item short form in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional measures","volume":"54","author":"Voshaar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Rheumatology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001965","article-title":"PROMIS (R) PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 physical function domain in spine patients","volume":"42","author":"Brodke","year":"2017","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0134094","article-title":"Calibration and validation of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS pain interference item bank in patients with chronic pain","volume":"10","author":"Crins","year":"2015","journal-title":"PloS one"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib116","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-012-0191-x","article-title":"Measurement invariance of the PROMIS pain interference item bank across community and clinical samples","volume":"22","author":"Kim","year":"2013","journal-title":"Qual life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib117","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1037\/1040-3590.10.2.176","article-title":"Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample","volume":"10","author":"Antony","year":"1998","journal-title":"Psychol Assess"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib118","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1348\/014466505X29657","article-title":"The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample","volume":"44","author":"Henry","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Clin Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001_bib119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2011.05.010","article-title":"Rasch analysis supports the use of the depression, anxiety, and stress scales to measure mood in groups but not in individuals with chronic low back pain","volume":"65","author":"Parkitny","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521694217300062?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521694217300062?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,29]],"date-time":"2018-08-29T21:21:40Z","timestamp":1535577700000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521694217300062"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"references-count":117,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S1521694217300062"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6942"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6942","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Choosing the right outcome measurement instruments for patients with low back pain","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.berh.2017.07.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}