{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T12:08:47Z","timestamp":1793362127962,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":61,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1654041600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1654041600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]],"date-time":"2023-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1685577600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":365,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000925","name":"National Health and Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["ID 1159667"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["ID 1159667"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000925","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bjanaesthesia.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["British Journal of Anaesthesia"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,14]],"date-time":"2022-04-14T00:52:30Z","timestamp":1649897550000},"page":"1029-1039","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":245,"title":["Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"128","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3324-5456","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paul S.","family":"Myles","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark A.","family":"Shulman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jennifer","family":"Reilly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jessica","family":"Kasza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9884-5463","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lorena","family":"Romero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199710000-00021","article-title":"Development of a measure of patient satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care: the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale","volume":"87","author":"Dexter","year":"1997","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366","article-title":"Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40","volume":"84","author":"Myles","year":"2000","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000265534.73169.95","article-title":"A\u00a0systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery","volume":"105","author":"Herrera","year":"2007","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2007.08.017","article-title":"Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments","volume":"143","author":"Kluivers","year":"2008","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2017.12.037","article-title":"Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: patient comfort","volume":"120","author":"Myles","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2021.1557","article-title":"Understanding the meaning of recovery to patients undergoing abdominal surgery","volume":"156","author":"Rajabiyazdi","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000000586","article-title":"Measurement of disability-free survival after surgery","volume":"122","author":"Shulman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199901000-00016","article-title":"Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults","volume":"88","author":"Myles","year":"1999","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1332","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0b013e318289b84b","article-title":"Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15","volume":"118","author":"Stark","year":"2013","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000001158","article-title":"Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales","volume":"125","author":"Myles","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1097\/ACO.0000000000000612","article-title":"Measuring quality of recovery in perioperative clinical trials","volume":"31","author":"Myles","year":"2018","journal-title":"Curr Opin Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-010-9606-8","article-title":"The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study","volume":"19","author":"Mokkink","year":"2010","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2021.03.008","article-title":"Postoperative quality of recovery measurements as endpoints in comparative anaesthesia studies: a systematic review","volume":"126","author":"L\u00e9ger","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2017.11.013","article-title":"Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient-reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia","volume":"120","author":"Kleif","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012","article-title":"Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires","volume":"60","author":"Terwee","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-198903001-00015","article-title":"Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status","volume":"27","author":"Kazis","year":"1989","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n160","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n160","article-title":"PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2008","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.283.15.2008","article-title":"Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting","volume":"283","author":"Stroup","year":"2000","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-011458","article-title":"Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)","volume":"6","author":"Downes","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7454.1490","article-title":"Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations","volume":"328","author":"Atkins","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1106","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39500.677199.AE","article-title":"Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies","volume":"336","author":"Sch\u00fcnemann","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","article-title":"Meta-analysis in clinical trials","volume":"7","author":"DerSimonian","year":"1986","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib24","series-title":"Introduction to meta-analysis","author":"Borenstein","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1214\/aoms\/1177729756","article-title":"Transformations related to the angular and the square root","volume":"21","author":"Freeman","year":"1950","journal-title":"Ann Math Stat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1186\/2049-3258-72-39","article-title":"Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data","volume":"72","author":"Nyaga","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1545","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-004-0027-4","article-title":"Quantifying responsiveness of quality of life measures without an external criterion","volume":"14","author":"Zou","year":"2005","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib28","first-page":"1036","article-title":"A\u00a0prospective clinical audit to evaluate postoperative quality of recovery in adults at New Somerset Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa","volume":"110","author":"Ally","year":"2020","journal-title":"S\u00a0Afr Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1088","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.13906","article-title":"Influence of quality of recovery on patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery: a prospective observational cohort study","volume":"72","author":"Berning","year":"2017","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1007\/s40271-015-0148-6","article-title":"Validation of the Chinese version of the quality of recovery-15 score and its comparison with the post-operative quality recovery scale","volume":"9","author":"Bu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Patient"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aev413","article-title":"Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery","volume":"116","author":"Chazapis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2020.03.011","article-title":"Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population","volume":"124","author":"Demumieux","year":"2020","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2021.07.026","article-title":"Validation of a translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in German patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery","volume":"127","author":"Kahl","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3456234","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/3456234","article-title":"Translation and validation of the Korean Version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15","volume":"2020","author":"Kim","year":"2020","journal-title":"BioMed Res Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"912","DOI":"10.1111\/aas.12525","article-title":"Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15","volume":"59","author":"Kleif","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.4097\/kja.20435","article-title":"Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire","volume":"74","author":"Lee","year":"2021","journal-title":"Korean J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e345","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2020.05.052","article-title":"Validation of an alternative French version of the quality of recovery-15 score: the FQoR-15","volume":"125","author":"L\u00e9ger","year":"2020","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib38","series-title":"Pasienterfaringer etter dagkirurgi\u2013oversettelse og validering av sp\u00f8rreskjemaet Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15nor)","author":"Leonardsen","year":"2020"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"893","DOI":"10.1111\/aas.13086","article-title":"Validation of the Swedish version of Quality of Recovery score-15: a multicentre, cohort study","volume":"62","author":"Lyckner","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib40","first-page":"426","article-title":"Translation and validation of the Japanese version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire","volume":"35","author":"Nakatani","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.23736\/S0375-9393.20.14472-9","article-title":"Translation and validation of the Italian version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15","volume":"86","author":"Picconi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Minerva Anestesiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.20344\/amp.6129","article-title":"Quality of recovery after anesthesia: validation of the Portuguese version of the 'Quality of Recovery 15' questionnaire","volume":"28","author":"S\u00e1","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Med Port"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-021-00351-9","article-title":"Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the quality of recovery-15 questionnaire","volume":"5","author":"Shahsavari","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Patient Rep Outcome."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1080\/22201181.2018.1470810","article-title":"Development and validation of the isiZulu quality of recovery score","volume":"24","author":"Sikhakhane","year":"2018","journal-title":"South Afr J Anaesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib45","first-page":"4","article-title":"Factors associated with recovery among patients after abdominal surgery","volume":"35","author":"Trang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Nurs Sci J Thailand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000005594","article-title":"Quality of recovery following orthopedic surgery in patients at an academic hospital in South Africa","volume":"133","author":"Wessels","year":"2021","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2020.06.040","article-title":"Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study","volume":"125","author":"Yoon","year":"2020","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1731","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa2028982","article-title":"Dexamethasone and surgical-site infection","volume":"384","author":"Corcoran","year":"2021","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2263","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1801601","article-title":"Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery","volume":"378","author":"Myles","year":"2018","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1907","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(19)32315-3","article-title":"Anaesthetic depth and complications after major surgery: an international, randomised controlled trial","volume":"394","author":"Short","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2018.08.016","article-title":"Using the 6-minute walk test to predict disability-free survival after major surgery","volume":"122","author":"Shulman","year":"2019","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2021.07.006","article-title":"Structural validity of the 15-item quality of recovery scale","volume":"127","author":"Myles","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1147","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-018-1798-3","article-title":"COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures","volume":"27","author":"Prinsen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"934","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000003977","article-title":"An updated minimal clinically important difference for the QoR-15 scale","volume":"135","author":"Myles","year":"2021","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(92)90194-R","article-title":"Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties?","volume":"45","author":"Guyatt","year":"1992","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib56","first-page":"2025","article-title":"Minimal clinically important difference, low disease activity state, and patient acceptable symptom state: methodological issues","volume":"32","author":"Tubach","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Rheumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib57","first-page":"1","article-title":"It\u2019s good to feel better but it\u2019s better to feel good","volume":"32","author":"Dougados","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Rheumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4952","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review","volume":"152","author":"Ljungqvist","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aet014","article-title":"Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review","volume":"111","author":"Gornall","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2017.12.037","article-title":"A\u00a0systematic review and consensus definitions for standardized endpoints in perioperative medicine: patient comfort","volume":"120","author":"Myles","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-018-0495-9","article-title":"Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations","volume":"18","author":"Mueller","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"}],"container-title":["British Journal of Anaesthesia"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0007091222001325?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0007091222001325?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,13]],"date-time":"2026-05-13T04:07:07Z","timestamp":1778645227000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0007091222001325"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]},"references-count":61,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0007091222001325"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-0912"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-0912","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"British Journal of Anaesthesia","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}