{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T00:36:34Z","timestamp":1791506194318,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,1]],"date-time":"2017-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1488326400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","jprasurg.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &amp; Aesthetic Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,19]],"date-time":"2016-11-19T06:32:15Z","timestamp":1479537135000},"page":"375-379","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["A double-blind randomized prospective study comparing prilocaine versus ropivacaine in upper blepharoplasty"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"70","author":[{"given":"Florian","family":"Ensat","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Klemens","family":"Heinrich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3266-2968","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hassan Mahmoud","family":"Kholosy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julia","family":"Wimbauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michaela","family":"Hladik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gottfried","family":"Wechselberger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1723","DOI":"10.1097\/01.PRS.0000161671.34502.40","article-title":"Current trends in local anesthesia in cosmetic plastic surgery of the head and neck: results of a German national survey and observations on the use of ropivacaine","volume":"115","author":"Koeppe","year":"2005","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1001\/archfaci.10.4.246","article-title":"Local anesthesia in oculoplastic surgery: precautions and pitfalls","volume":"10","author":"Vagefi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Facial Plast Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199910000-00036","article-title":"Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study","volume":"89","author":"Bisgaard","year":"1999","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.3109\/01676830903071240","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial to compare patient satisfaction with two different types of local anesthesia in ptosis surgery","volume":"28","author":"Lee","year":"2009","journal-title":"Orbit"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-8588(18)30152-7","article-title":"Fundamentals of bone marrow examination","volume":"8","author":"Hyun","year":"1994","journal-title":"Hematol Oncol Clin North Am"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2048","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.05.029","article-title":"Double-blind, bilateral pain comparison with simultaneous injection of 2% lidocaine versus buffered 2% lidocaine for periocular anesthesia","volume":"119","author":"Welch","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1308\/003588404323043382","article-title":"Taking the \u201couch\u201d out-effect of buffering commercial Xylocaine on infiltration and procedure pain. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial","volume":"86","author":"Younis","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-0644(98)70278-1","article-title":"Pain of local anesthetics: rate of administration and buffering","volume":"31","author":"Scarfone","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ann Emerg Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199802000-00030","article-title":"The effect of needle gauge and lidocaine ph on pain during intradermal injection","volume":"86","author":"Palmon","year":"1998","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1188\/09.ONF.52-60","article-title":"Use of buffered lidocaine in bone marrow biopsies: a randomized, controlled trial","volume":"36","author":"Ruegg","year":"2009","journal-title":"Oncol Nurs Forum"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02592.x","article-title":"The effect of order on pain of local anesthetic infiltration","volume":"5","author":"Bartfield","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acad Emerg Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib12","first-page":"411","article-title":"Pain comparison of unbuffered versus buffered lidocaine in local wound infiltration","volume":"10","author":"Orlinsky","year":"1992","journal-title":"Emerg Med"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1242","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2015.04.021","article-title":"A randomised double-blinded crossover study comparing pain during anaesthetising the eyelids in upper blepharoplasty: first versus second eyelid and lidocaine versus prilocaine","volume":"68","author":"Pool","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.2500\/ajra.2013.27.3945","article-title":"Comparison of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, prilocaine and lidocaine in the management of pain and haemorrhage during nasal pack removal","volume":"27","author":"Gencer","year":"2013","journal-title":"Rhinol Allery"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1007\/s004230000138","article-title":"Subcutaneous infusion anesthesia with diluted mixtures of prilocain and ropivacain","volume":"385","author":"Breuninger","year":"2000","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &amp; Aesthetic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1748681516304752?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1748681516304752?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,14]],"date-time":"2022-07-14T05:07:48Z","timestamp":1657775268000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1748681516304752"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S1748681516304752"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014","relation":{},"ISSN":["1748-6815"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1748-6815","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A double-blind randomized prospective study comparing prilocaine versus ropivacaine in upper blepharoplasty","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bjps.2016.10.014","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}