{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T15:14:54Z","timestamp":1773155694413,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":75,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,2,1]],"date-time":"2005-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1107216000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2004,12,17]],"date-time":"2004-12-17T23:29:42Z","timestamp":1103326182000},"page":"117-130","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["Evidence-based vaginal birth after Caesarean section"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Jeanne-Marie","family":"Guise","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jason","family":"Hashima","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Patricia","family":"Osterweil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib1","unstructured":"Cesarean Childbirth: Report of a Consensus Development Conference. Sponsored by the NICHHD in Conjunction with the National Center for Health Care Technology and Assisted by the Office for Medical Applications of Research. NIH Publication, 1981, p. 82\u20132067."},{"issue":"8452","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib2","first-page":"436","article-title":"Appropriate technology for birth","volume":"2","author":"Anonymous","year":"1985","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib3","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2002","volume":"52","author":"Martin","year":"2003","journal-title":"National Vital Statistics Reports"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib4","unstructured":"Thomas J & Paranjothy S. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Press, 2001."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib5","unstructured":"Canadian Perinatal Health Report, 2000. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2000."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000116259.41678.f1","article-title":"Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review","volume":"103","author":"Guise","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib7","first-page":"713","article-title":"Trial of labor in previous cesarean section patients, excluding classical cesarean sections","volume":"70","author":"Stovall","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00398-1","article-title":"Intrapartum uterine rupture and dehiscence in patients with prior lower uterine segment vertical and transverse incisions","volume":"94","author":"Shipp","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)90746-9","article-title":"Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean birth","volume":"146","author":"Martin","year":"1983","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(88)80141-8","article-title":"Unknown uterine scar and trial of labor","volume":"159","author":"Pruett","year":"1988","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib11","first-page":"936","article-title":"Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: experience in the non-university level II regional hospital setting","volume":"79","author":"Holland","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1666","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91398-X","article-title":"Trial of labor after cesarean delivery with a lower-segment, vertical uterine incision: is it safe?","volume":"172","author":"Naef","year":"1995","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"966","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70334-4","article-title":"Trial of labor in patients with a previous lower uterine vertical cesarean section","volume":"174","author":"Adair","year":"1996","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)90765-0","article-title":"Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery: a case\u2013control study","volume":"168","author":"Leung","year":"1993","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199011000-00004","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study","volume":"76","author":"Flamm","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib16","first-page":"255","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience","volume":"84","author":"Miller","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00078-6","article-title":"More than one previous cesarean delivery: a 5-year experience with 435 patients","volume":"85","author":"Asakura","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70317-0","article-title":"Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries","volume":"181","author":"Caughey","year":"1999","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199406000-00006","article-title":"Trial of labor following cesarean delivery","volume":"83","author":"Cowan","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90051-2","article-title":"Vaginal birth after two or more previous cesarean sections","volume":"156","author":"Farmakides","year":"1987","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90446-8","article-title":"Obstetric outcome of patients with more than one previous cesarean section","volume":"160","author":"Novas","year":"1989","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1994.22.1.13","article-title":"The management of labor in women with more than one uterine scar: is a repeat cesarean section really the only \u2018safe\u2019 option?","volume":"22","author":"Granovsky-Grisaru","year":"1994","journal-title":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999555","article-title":"Delivery following cesarean section and perinatal mortality","volume":"6","author":"Phelan","year":"1989","journal-title":"American Journal of Perinatology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)84257-3","article-title":"One- versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy","volume":"89","author":"Chapman","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"925","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)01056-1","article-title":"Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery","volume":"189","author":"Durnwald","year":"2003","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90490-A","article-title":"Trial of labor after a one- or two-layer closure of a low transverse uterine incision","volume":"168","author":"Tucker","year":"1993","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)02319-0","article-title":"Post-cesarean delivery fever and uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor","volume":"101","author":"Shipp","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1326","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.122416","article-title":"The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture","volume":"186","author":"Bujold","year":"2002","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1199","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127138","article-title":"Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture","volume":"187","author":"Bujold","year":"2002","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00531-0","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system","volume":"90","author":"Flamm","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib31","first-page":"174","article-title":"Factors predicting outcome of trial of labor after prior cesarean section in a developing country","volume":"30","author":"Adjahoto","year":"2001","journal-title":"Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1516","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.472","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: weight-based outcomes","volume":"188","author":"Carroll","year":"2003","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.116729","article-title":"Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat cesarean section","volume":"185","author":"Chauhan","year":"2001","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00710-5","article-title":"Deciding on route of delivery for obese women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"189","author":"Edwards","year":"2003","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib35","first-page":"36","article-title":"Previous cesarean birth: trial of labor in women with macrosomic infants","volume":"29","author":"Phelan","year":"1984","journal-title":"Journal of Reproductive Medicine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib36","first-page":"694","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication?","volume":"74","author":"Flamm","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117361","article-title":"Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000g","volume":"185","author":"Zelop","year":"2001","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01792-6","article-title":"The association of maternal age and symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"99","author":"Shipp","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.186","article-title":"The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates","volume":"188","author":"Elkousy","year":"2003","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70274-0","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section in twin gestation","volume":"175","author":"Miller","year":"1996","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90224-X","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the twin gestation","volume":"161","author":"Strong","year":"1989","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib42","first-page":"205","article-title":"Twin vaginal birth after cesarean","volume":"64","author":"Wax","year":"2000","journal-title":"Connecticut Medicine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)31031-3","article-title":"Trial of labour compared to elective Caesarean in twin gestations with a previous Caesarean delivery","volume":"25","author":"Delaney","year":"2003","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Canada"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)31032-5","article-title":"Twin delivery after a previous caesarean: a twelve-year experience","volume":"25","author":"Sansregret","year":"2003","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Canada"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349709024607","article-title":"Evidence that women with a history of cesarean section can deliver twins safely","volume":"76","author":"Odeh","year":"1997","journal-title":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.10.3.171.174","article-title":"Vaginal birth of twins after a previous Cesarean section","volume":"10","author":"Myles","year":"2001","journal-title":"Journal of Maternal\u2013Fetal Medicine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)01129-7","article-title":"Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture","volume":"97","author":"Shipp","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01652-0","article-title":"Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"99","author":"Huang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1180","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109046","article-title":"Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: a case\u2013control study","volume":"183","author":"Esposito","year":"2000","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"506","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000113619.67704.99","article-title":"Fetal heart rate changes associated with uterine rupture","volume":"103","author":"Ridgeway","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib51","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: preliminary data for 1999","volume":"48","author":"Curtin","year":"2000","journal-title":"National Vital Statistics Reports"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib52","unstructured":"Guise J-M, McDonagh M, Hashima JN et al. Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC): Evidence Report\/Technology Assessment. Publication No. 03-E018. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2003, p. 71."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib53","first-page":"176","article-title":"A five year review of scar dehiscence in the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin","volume":"94","author":"Connolly","year":"2001","journal-title":"Irish Medical Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"345","author":"Lydon-Rochelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"New England Journal of Medicine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994118","article-title":"Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a multicenter study of patients with prior cesarean delivery","volume":"14","author":"Flamm","year":"1997","journal-title":"American Journal of Perinatology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994676","article-title":"Prostaglandin E2 gel induction of patients with a prior low transverse cesarean section","volume":"9","author":"Blanco","year":"1992","journal-title":"American Journal of Perinatology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 271. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002; 99: 679\u201380.","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200204000-00038"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.329.7456.19","article-title":"Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with prior caesarean section","volume":"329","author":"Guise","year":"2004","journal-title":"British Medical Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00232-4","article-title":"Uterine activity patterns in uterine rupture: a case\u2013control study","volume":"92","author":"Phelan","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90375-X","article-title":"Uterine rupture: are intrauterine pressure catheters useful in the diagnosis?","volume":"161","author":"Rodriguez","year":"1989","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib61","first-page":"626","article-title":"The prediction of \u2018controlled\u2019 uterine rupture by the use of intrauterine pressure catheters","volume":"80","author":"Devoe","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90562-3","article-title":"Vaginal delivery following cesarean section: use of oxytocin augmentation and epidural anesthesia with internal tocodynamic and internal fetal monitoring","volume":"148","author":"Flamm","year":"1984","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13391.x","article-title":"Scar rupture in labour after previous lower uterine segment caesarean section: the role of uterine activity measurement","volume":"98","author":"Beckley","year":"1991","journal-title":"British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.045","article-title":"Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of prognostic factors and screening tools","volume":"190","author":"Hashima","year":"2004","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)80046-9","article-title":"Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system","volume":"167","author":"Troyer","year":"1992","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000110544.42128.7a","article-title":"Predicting failed trial of labor after primary cesarean delivery","volume":"103","author":"Dinsmoor","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib67","series-title":"ACTOBAC: A Collaborative Trial of Birth After Caesarean. Health Professional Information Sheet","author":"Crowther","year":"2002"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib68","first-page":"31","article-title":"Vaginal delivery after cesarean section in women with unknown types of uterine scar","volume":"29","author":"Beall","year":"1984","journal-title":"Journal of Reproductive Medicine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib69","first-page":"936","article-title":"Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: experience in the non-university level II regional hospital setting","volume":"79","author":"Holland","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib70","first-page":"770","article-title":"Trial of labor in patients with multiple previous cesarean sections","volume":"28","author":"Porreco","year":"1983","journal-title":"Journal of Reproductive Medicine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1990.tb00722.x","article-title":"Vaginal birth after two or more cesarean sections: a five-year experience","volume":"17","author":"Hansell","year":"1990","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13149.x","article-title":"Planned vaginal delivery after two previous caesarean sections","volume":"101","author":"Chattopadhyay","year":"1994","journal-title":"British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00328-6","article-title":"Vaginal birth following two previous cesarean sections","volume":"94","author":"Bretelle","year":"2001","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Biology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001","article-title":"Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section","volume":"335","author":"McMahon","year":"1996","journal-title":"New England Journal of Medicine"},{"issue":"supplement","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-3797(01)00261-6","article-title":"Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process","volume":"20","author":"Harris","year":"2001","journal-title":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693404001579?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693404001579?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,30]],"date-time":"2019-01-30T23:27:52Z","timestamp":1548890872000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693404001579"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,2]]},"references-count":75,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S1521693404001579"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,2]]}}}