{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,10]],"date-time":"2026-02-10T16:08:22Z","timestamp":1770739702906,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":60,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice &amp; Research Clinical Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,25]],"date-time":"2012-10-25T13:15:18Z","timestamp":1351170918000},"page":"209-219","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Caesarean section for preterm birth and, breech presentation and twin pregnancies"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Arijit","family":"Biswas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lin Lin","family":"Su","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Mattar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1053\/beog.2000.0156","article-title":"Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?","volume":"15","author":"Robson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib2","first-page":"CD000078","article-title":"Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons","volume":"6","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.01129.x","article-title":"Mode of delivery in the early preterm infant (<28 weeks)","volume":"113","author":"Drife","year":"2006","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00268.x","article-title":"The relationship between delivery mode and mortality in very low birthweight singleton vertex-presenting infants","volume":"111","author":"Riskin","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2007-2620","article-title":"Impact of caesarean section on neonatal mortality rates among very preterm infants in the United States, 2000\u20132003","volume":"122","author":"Malloy","year":"2008","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000192400.31757.a6","article-title":"Survival advantage associated with caesarean delivery in very low birth weight vertex neonates","volume":"107","author":"Lee","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-005-0029-z","article-title":"Method of delivery and neonatal mortality among very low birth weight infants in the United States","volume":"10","author":"Muhuri","year":"2006","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2008.00292.x","article-title":"Impact of caesarean section on intermediate and late preterm births: United States, 2000\u20132003","volume":"36","author":"Malloy","year":"2009","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1419","DOI":"10.3109\/14767051003678218","article-title":"Method of delivery and intraventricular haemorrhage in extremely preterm infants","volume":"23","author":"Dani","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000154156.51578.50","article-title":"The impact of vaginal delivery in premature infants weighing less than 1,251 grams","volume":"105","author":"Deulofeut","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31817cfdf1","article-title":"Delivery mode and severe intraventricular hemorrhage in single, very low birth weight, vertex infants","volume":"112","author":"Riskin","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-007-0438-x","article-title":"Caesarean or vaginal delivery for preterm very-low-birth weight (< or = 1,250\u00a0g) infant: experience from a district general hospital in UK","volume":"277","author":"Haque","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00360-0","article-title":"Does labor influence neonatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely-low-birth-weight infants who are born by caesarean delivery?","volume":"189","author":"Wadhawan","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib15","series-title":"RCOG Green Top Guidelines: The management of breech presentation, guideline no. 20","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1189","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200112000-00045","article-title":"ACOG committee opinion no. 265, mode of term singleton breech delivery","volume":"98","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.056","article-title":"Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned caesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial","volume":"191","author":"Whyte","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.08.004","article-title":"Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial","volume":"191","author":"Hannah","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34221-9","article-title":"SOGC clinical practice guideline no. 226. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation","volume":"31","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib20","first-page":"CD000166","article-title":"Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)03602-3","article-title":"Term breech trial","volume":"357","author":"Biswas","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib23","first-page":"2211","article-title":"Breech presentation: infant versus mother","volume":"149","author":"Visser","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib24","first-page":"2207","article-title":"Breech presentation at term: elective caesarean section is the wrong choice as a standard treatment because of too high risks for the mother and her future children","volume":"149","author":"Verhoeven","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib25","series-title":"RCOG Green Top Guidelines: The management of breech presentation. Guideline no. 20b","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200607000-00058","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340, Mode of term singleton breech delivery","volume":"108","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994704","article-title":"The Iowa premature breech trial","volume":"10","author":"Zlatnik","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib28","first-page":"473","article-title":"Vaginal vs. caesarean delivery for preterm breech presentation of singleton infants in California: a population-based study","volume":"52","author":"Robilio","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lodha A, Zhu Q, Lee SK, et\u00a0al; Canadian Neonatal Network. Neonatal outcomes of preterm infants in breech presentation according to mode of birth in Canadian NICUs. Postgrad Med J 2011;87: 175\u2013179.","DOI":"10.1136\/pgmj.2010.107532"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-1956-0","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among breech births","volume":"285","author":"Demirci","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.10.794","article-title":"Early preterm breech delivery: is a policy of planned vaginal delivery associated with increased risk of neonatal death?","volume":"198","author":"Kayem","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09838.x","article-title":"A multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing elective and selective caesarean section for the delivery of the preterm breech infant","volume":"103","author":"Penn","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib33","first-page":"618","article-title":"The epidemiology of perinatal mortality in multiple births","volume":"66","author":"Kiely","year":"1990","journal-title":"Bull NY Acad Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/152.12.1107","article-title":"Mortality of twins and singletons by gestational age: a varying-coefficient approach","volume":"152","author":"Cheung","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39118.483819.55","article-title":"Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994\u20132003: retrospective cohort study","volume":"334","author":"Smith","year":"2007","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"778","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.013","article-title":"Neonatal mortality in second twin according to cause of death, gestational age, and mode of delivery","volume":"191","author":"Wen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1121","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198710293171805","article-title":"Respiratory distress syndrome in second-born versus firstborn twins. A matched case-control analysis","volume":"317","author":"Arnold","year":"1987","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.109399","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity rates among twin pairs at different gestational ages: optimal delivery timing at 37 to 38 weeks' gestation","volume":"184","author":"Hartley","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/S0095-5108(18)30254-9","article-title":"Intrapartum management of multiple gestation","volume":"23","author":"Houlihan","year":"1996","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199803000-00008","article-title":"Is the route of delivery a meaningful issue in twins?","volume":"41","author":"Benachi","year":"1998","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"462.e16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.12.009","article-title":"Infant morbidity and mortality associated with vaginal delivery in twin gestations","volume":"200","author":"Peaceman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90216-E","article-title":"Twin delivery: influence of the presentation and method of delivery on the second twin","volume":"165","author":"Adam","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199003000-00009","article-title":"Intrapartum management of twin gestation","volume":"33","author":"Adams","year":"1990","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib44","first-page":"91","article-title":"Delivery of twins","volume":"12","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"1998","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02836.x","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"118","author":"Rossi","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211408","article-title":"Neonatal mortality and morbidity in vertex-vertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight","volume":"23","author":"Yang","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00269-4","article-title":"Twin delivery and neonatal and infant mortality: a population-based study","volume":"88","author":"Zhang","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib48","first-page":"323","article-title":"Special problems of multiple gestations","volume":"64","author":"Anonymous","year":"1999","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.64","article-title":"Caesarean delivery for twins: a systemic review and meta-analysis","volume":"188","author":"Hogle","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00474-3","article-title":"Delivery of breech first twins: a multicenter retrospective study","volume":"95","author":"Blickstein","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90201-8","article-title":"Randomized management of the second nonvertex twin: vaginal delivery or caesarean section","volume":"156","author":"Rabinovici","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib52","first-page":"109","article-title":"An evidence-based approach to determining route of delivery for twin gestations","volume":"4","author":"Christopher","year":"2011","journal-title":"Rev Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1147","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01130.x","article-title":"Is a planned caesarean necessary in twin pregnancies?","volume":"90","author":"Vendittelli","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.132","article-title":"Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight","volume":"192","author":"Yang","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(84)80022-8","article-title":"Is routine cesarean section necessary for vertex-breech and vertex- transverse twin gestations?","volume":"148","author":"Chervenak","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib56","first-page":"774","article-title":"Vaginal delivery of the second twin in breech presentation","volume":"69","author":"Blickstein","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)91190-N","article-title":"Prognosis for twins with birthweight less than 1500\u00a0gm: impact of caesarean section in relation to fetal presentation","volume":"163","author":"Rydhstr\u00f6m","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318187ccb2","article-title":"Caesarean delivery for the second twin","volume":"112","author":"Alexander","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1097\/00007611-199802000-00007","article-title":"Caesarean delivery for the second twin in the vertex-vertex presentation: operative indications and predictability","volume":"91","author":"Sullivan","year":"1998","journal-title":"South Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002_bib60","first-page":"767","article-title":"Caesarean section for the second twin","volume":"42","author":"Kurzel","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"}],"container-title":["Best Practice &amp; Research Clinical Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693412001435?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693412001435?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,4]],"date-time":"2019-07-04T20:26:29Z","timestamp":1562271989000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693412001435"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"references-count":60,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S1521693412001435"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Caesarean section for preterm birth and, breech presentation and twin pregnancies","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}