{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T08:21:21Z","timestamp":1778574081326,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":101,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice &amp; Research Clinical Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,14]],"date-time":"2013-02-14T17:31:02Z","timestamp":1360863062000},"page":"179-195","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Surgical techniques for performing caesarean section including CS at full dilatation"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Suchitra N.","family":"Pandit","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rana J.","family":"Khan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib1","series-title":"Women's health today: perspectives on current research and clinical practice. The proceedings of the XIV world congress of obstetrics and gynecology","first-page":"59","article-title":"Global aspects of a rising caesarean section rate","author":"Bhasker Rao","year":"1994"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02006.x","article-title":"High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population-based cross-sectional study","volume":"110","author":"Sreevidya","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00589-9","article-title":"Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK","volume":"102","author":"Tully","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib4","series-title":"Cesarean delivery","article-title":"History and evolution of cesarean delivery","author":"Katz","year":"1988"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-8545(21)00719-1","article-title":"History and development of cesarean operation","volume":"15","author":"Gabert","year":"1988","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib6","series-title":"A pictorial history of gynecology and obstetrics","author":"Speert","year":"1973"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib7","first-page":"319","article-title":"The history of caesarean section","volume":"145","author":"Boley","year":"1991","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-199607000-00024","article-title":"Refinements in performing a cesarean delivery","volume":"51","author":"Rayburn","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1983.01390030079013","article-title":"The influence of hair removal methods on wound infections","volume":"118","author":"Alexander","year":"1983","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-6553(99)70088-X","article-title":"Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee","volume":"27","author":"Mangram","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Infect Control"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1053\/jhin.2000.0843","article-title":"Do plastic adhesive drapes prevent post caesarean wound infection?","volume":"47","author":"Ward","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Hosp Infect"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1016\/0195-6701(89)90007-8","article-title":"The effect of incisional plastic drapes and redisinfection of operation site on wound infection following caesarean section","volume":"13","author":"Cordtz","year":"1989","journal-title":"J Hosp Infect"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1177\/145749690209100401","article-title":"Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications","volume":"91","author":"Burger","year":"2002","journal-title":"Scand J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1446","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.106849","article-title":"The legendary superior strength of the Pfannenstiel incision: a myth?","volume":"182","author":"Hendrix","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"832","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349409072515","article-title":"The cosmetic outcome of the scar formation after cesarean section: percutaneous or intracutaneous suture?","volume":"73","author":"Lindholt","year":"1994","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib16","series-title":"TeLinde's operative gynecology","author":"Rock","year":"2003"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1040","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2002.811108.x","article-title":"Joel-Cohen or Pfannenstiel incision at cesarean delivery: does it make a difference?","volume":"81","author":"Franchi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01570-8","article-title":"Is the formation of a bladder flap at cesarean necessary? A randomized trial","volume":"98","author":"Hohlagschwandtner","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(94)90218-6","article-title":"Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in cesarean section","volume":"53","author":"Stark","year":"1994","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00061-9","article-title":"Comparison of two transverse abdominal incisions for cesarean delivery","volume":"78","author":"Mathai","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib21","first-page":"706","article-title":"Surgical incision for cesarean section","volume":"70","author":"Ayers","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)01957-9","article-title":"Pfannenstiel versus Maylard incision for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"99","author":"Giacalone","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1984.01390200037009","article-title":"One instead of two knives for surgical incision. Does it increase the risk of postoperative wound infection?","volume":"119","author":"Hasselgren","year":"1984","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-197401000-00019","article-title":"Skin knife-deep knife: the ritual and practice of skin incisions","volume":"179","author":"Jacobs","year":"1974","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800770610","article-title":"Wound infection after abdominal incision with scalpel or diathermy","volume":"77","author":"Johnson","year":"1990","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1018","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1991.01410320108015","article-title":"A prospective study of incisional time, blood loss, pain, and healing with carbon dioxide laser, scalpel, and electrosurgery","volume":"126","author":"Pearlman","year":"1991","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800751211","article-title":"Incisions with knife or diathermy and postoperative pain","volume":"75","author":"Hussain","year":"1988","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1022","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90026-4","article-title":"Blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision in low-segment transverse cesarean section","volume":"171","author":"Rodriguez","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01296.x","article-title":"Intra-operative haemorrhage by blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision at caesarean delivery: a randomised clinical trial","volume":"109","author":"Magann","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00359-2","article-title":"The effect of manual removal of the placenta on post-cesarean endometritis","volume":"87","author":"Atkinson","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70453-8","article-title":"The case for trial of labor in the patient with a prior low-segment vertical cesarean incision","volume":"177","author":"Martin","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610120101655","article-title":"Fetal lacerations at caesarean section","volume":"22","author":"Wiener","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.11.3.196.198","article-title":"Laceration injury at cesarean section","volume":"11","author":"Haas","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00284-6","article-title":"Fetal laceration injury at cesarean delivery","volume":"90","author":"Smith","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib34","article-title":"Absorbable staples for uterine incision at caesarean section","volume":"3","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib35","first-page":"1","volume":"8","author":"Patwardhan","year":"1957","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib36","first-page":"187","article-title":"Cesarean section in a wedged head","volume":"57","author":"Khosla","year":"2003","journal-title":"Indian J Med Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib37","first-page":"244","article-title":"Evaluation of Patwardhan's technic \u2013 a four year study in a rural teaching hospital","volume":"55","author":"Partha","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(81)90473-7","article-title":"A technique to facilitate delivery of the high-floating head at cesarean section","volume":"139","author":"Warenski","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2000-10009","article-title":"Instrumental delivery of the fetal head at the time of elective repeat cesarean: a randomized pilot study","volume":"17","author":"Bofill","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1016\/S1526-9523(01)00196-9","article-title":"Current best evidence: a review of the literature on umbilical cord clamping","volume":"46","author":"Mercer","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/S0266-6138(05)80195-0","article-title":"A study of the relationship between the delivery to cord clamping interval and the time of cord separation. Oxford Midwives Research Group","volume":"7","year":"1991","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1007\/PL00008345","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of delayed cord clamping in very low birth weight preterm infants","volume":"159","author":"Rabe","year":"2000","journal-title":"Eur J Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1440-1754.1997.tb01606.x","article-title":"Delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants: a feasibility study","volume":"33","author":"McDonnell","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Paediatr Child Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib44_1","series-title":"Why mothers die 1997\u20131999. The fifth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib44_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03012092","article-title":"Oxytocin injection after caesarean delivery: intravenous or intramyometrial?","volume":"45","author":"Dennehy","year":"1998","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2001.tb01319.x","article-title":"Active management of the third stage at caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial of misoprostol versus syntocinon","volume":"41","author":"Lokugamage","year":"2001","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01479-X","article-title":"Comparison of two oxytocin regimens to prevent uterine atony at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"98","author":"Munn","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)05835-4","article-title":"WHO multicentre randomised trial of misoprostol in the management of the third stage of labour","volume":"358","author":"Gulmezoglu","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1356","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90160-0","article-title":"A prospective, double-blind, randomized comparison of prophylactic intramyometrial 15-methyl prostaglandin F2, 125 micrograms, and intravenous oxytocin, 20 units, for the control of blood loss at elective cesarean section","volume":"171","author":"Chou","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib49","first-page":"202","article-title":"Double-blind, randomized comparison of the effect of carbetocin and oxytocin on intraoperative blood loss and uterine tone of patients undergoing cesarean section","volume":"18","author":"Boucher","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70271-1","article-title":"Double-blind comparison of carbetocin vs oxytocin in preventing uterine atony post cesarean section","volume":"181","author":"Dansereau","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib51","article-title":"Manual removal of placenta at caesarean section","volume":"1","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib52","first-page":"517","article-title":"Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair","volume":"181","author":"Magann","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1363","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)91717-7","article-title":"The effect of placental management at cesarean delivery on operative blood loss","volume":"167","author":"McCurdy","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6661(199803\/04)7:2<100::AID-MFM9>3.0.CO;2-Q","article-title":"Effects of placental delivery method and intraoperative glove changing on postcesarean febrile morbidity","volume":"7","author":"Cernadas","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1250","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70342-9","article-title":"The effect of placental removal method on the incidence of postcesarean infections","volume":"176","author":"Lasley","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib56","first-page":"101","article-title":"Manual removal of the placenta and postcesarean endometritis","volume":"47","author":"Chandra","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib57","article-title":"Single versus two layer suturing for closing the uterine incision at caesarean section","volume":"2","author":"Enkin","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1070","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09938.x","article-title":"Uterine exteriorisation at caesarean section: influence on maternal morbidity","volume":"105","author":"Edi-Osagie","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08429.x","article-title":"A randomised, controlled study of uterine exteriorisation and repair at caesarean section","volume":"106","author":"Wahab","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib60","first-page":"189","article-title":"Extraabdominal uterine exteriorization at cesarean section","volume":"52","author":"Hershey","year":"1978","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib61","first-page":"389","article-title":"Blood loss at time of cesarean section by method of placental removal and exteriorization versus in situ repair of the uterine incision","volume":"177","author":"Magann","year":"1993","journal-title":"Surg Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib62","article-title":"Single versus two layer suturing for closing the uterine incision at Caesarean section","volume":"3","author":"Enkin","year":"2001","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1108","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)80048-2","article-title":"Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers","volume":"167","author":"Hauth","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(88)90111-7","article-title":"Comparative study of single layer and conventional closure of uterine incision in cesarean section","volume":"27","author":"Lal","year":"1988","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6661(199611\/12)5:6<366::AID-MFM15>3.0.CO;2-F","article-title":"Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routine cesarean sections?","volume":"5","author":"Ohel","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)84257-3","article-title":"One-versus two layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy","volume":"89","author":"Chapman","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib67","first-page":"225","article-title":"A histologic evaluation of peritoneal injury and repair: Implications for adhesion formation","volume":"70","author":"Elkins","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1366","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02686.x","article-title":"Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR)","volume":"117","author":"The CAESAR study collaborative group (2010)","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1187","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.108890","article-title":"Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999","volume":"183","author":"Mozurkewich","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00675-6","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of the literature","volume":"189","author":"Chauhan","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib71","article-title":"Peritoneal non-closure at cesarean section","volume":"3","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib72","first-page":"818","article-title":"A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery","volume":"77","author":"Hull","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09839.x","article-title":"Nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"103","author":"Irion","year":"1996","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1366","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70686-5","article-title":"Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery","volume":"174","author":"Nagele","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1080\/j.1600-0412.1998.770708.x","article-title":"Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section\u2013evaluation of pain. A randomized study","volume":"77","author":"Hojberg","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)00315-5","article-title":"Can Joel-Cohen incision and single layer reconstruction reduce cesarean section morbidity?","volume":"72","author":"Ferrari","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib77","series-title":"Precis V: an update in obstetrics and gynecology","article-title":"Wound healing: techniques and materials","year":"1994"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1119","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123823","article-title":"Subcutaneous stitch closure versus subcutaneous drain to prevent wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"186","author":"Magann","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1350","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2168.2002.02258.x","article-title":"Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions","volume":"89","author":"Van","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(98)00277-3","article-title":"Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis","volume":"176","author":"Weiland","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.11.6.403.408","article-title":"Closure of the subcutaneous dead space and wound disruption after Cesarean delivery","volume":"11","author":"Chelmow","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib82","first-page":"246","article-title":"No benefit from post-caesarean wound drainage: a prospective randomised controlled trial","volume":"131","author":"Ochsenbein-Imhof","year":"2001","journal-title":"Swiss Med Wkly"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib83","first-page":"327","article-title":"Subcutaneous drain vs. suture in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. A\u00a0prospective, randomized trial","volume":"45","author":"Allaire","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003577","article-title":"Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section","volume":"1","author":"Alderdice","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib85","article-title":"Early compared with delayed oral fluids and food after caesarean section","volume":"3","author":"Mangesi","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe","article-title":"Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor","volume":"109","author":"Alexander","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.02.013","article-title":"Continued reduction in the incidence of birth trauma and birth asphyxia related to instrumental deliveries after the study period: was this the Hawthorne effect?","volume":"130","author":"Leung","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00615.x","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labor","volume":"112","author":"Allen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38971.466979.DE","article-title":"Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labor \u2013 better training in instrumental delivery may reduce rates","volume":"333","author":"Spencer","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000154889.47063.84","article-title":"Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome","volume":"105","author":"Senecal","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08360.x","article-title":"Undiagnosed breech revisited","volume":"106","author":"Leung","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1032","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01597-6","article-title":"Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twin pregnancy","volume":"98","author":"Persad","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.084","article-title":"Occurrence and clinical predictors of operative delivery for the second twin after normal vaginal delivery of the first twin","volume":"192","author":"Yang","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1325","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70049-2","article-title":"a randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractor","volume":"175","author":"Bofill","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3848","article-title":"Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction","volume":"28","author":"Henrich","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib97","first-page":"376","article-title":"Emergency hysterectomy for the control of obstetric hemorrhage","volume":"64","author":"Clark","year":"1984","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib98","first-page":"385","article-title":"Cesarean section-related maternal mortality in Massachusetts, 1954\u20131985","volume":"741","author":"Sachs","year":"1988","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006_bib99","unstructured":"RCOG statement on NICE updated guidelines on caesarean section, NICE has today (23 November 2011) published its revised guidelines on caesarean section which provides several new and updated recommendations on the procedure."}],"container-title":["Best Practice &amp; Research Clinical Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693413000035?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693413000035?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,8]],"date-time":"2022-02-08T19:04:51Z","timestamp":1644347091000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693413000035"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"references-count":101,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S1521693413000035"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Surgical techniques for performing caesarean section including CS at full dilatation","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.006","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}