{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]],"date-time":"2026-06-24T16:02:24Z","timestamp":1782316944179,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,1]],"date-time":"2014-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1406851200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bestpracticeobgyn.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,6,5]],"date-time":"2014-06-05T14:52:03Z","timestamp":1401979923000},"page":"807-824","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["The intrauterine device and the intrauterine system"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"E.","family":"Stephen Searle","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib1","unstructured":"NICE Clinical Guideline 30, October 2005; www.nice.org.uk [last accessed 12.05.05]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib2","first-page":"2044","article-title":"Considering the risks and benefits of intrauterine devices: should clinician advice now be changed?","volume":"10","author":"Bahamondes","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90455-9","article-title":"A\u00a0prospective New Zealand study of fertility after removal of copper intrauterine contraceptive devices for conception and because of complications: a four year study","volume":"160","author":"Wilson","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib4","unstructured":"UKMEC under publications in www.fsrh.org.uk."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib5","series-title":"Quick starting contraception","author":"Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-7599.2012.00753.x","article-title":"A\u00a0clinical guideline for intrauterine device use in adolescents","volume":"24","author":"Smith","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Acad Nurse Pract"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e32835686d5","article-title":"Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents","volume":"24","author":"McNicholas","year":"2012","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib8","series-title":"Sexually transmitted and other reproductive health infections","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)91904-M","article-title":"Intrauterine contraceptive devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective","volume":"339","author":"Farley","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib10","series-title":"The contraception report, modern IUDs Part 2","first-page":"2","author":"Dannemiller Memorial Educational Foundation","year":"1998"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib11","unstructured":"Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare Clinical Guidance. Intrauterine contraception, November 2007. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare; http:\/\/www.fsrh.org\/pdfs\/CEUGuidanceintrauterineContraceptionNov07.pdf [last accessed 12.05.14]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1699","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.128091","article-title":"Mechanisms of action of intrauterine devices: update and estimation of postfertilisation effects","volume":"187","author":"Stanford","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(89)80008-3","article-title":"Plasma levonorgestrel levels and ovarian function during the use of a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive device","volume":"39","author":"Ratsula","year":"1989","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib14","first-page":"CD005347","article-title":"Copper containing, framed intra-uterine devices for contraception","volume":"3","author":"Kulier","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib15","series-title":"Long acting reversible contraception: the effective and appropriate use of long-acting reversible contraception","author":"National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness (NICE)","year":"2005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta4070","article-title":"Implantable contraceptives (subdermal implants and hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives: two systematic reviews to assess relative effectiveness, acceptability, tolerability and cost-effectiveness","volume":"4","author":"French","year":"2000","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(90)91706-G","article-title":"Long-term use of copper intrauterine devices","volume":"336","author":"Tacchi","year":"1990","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1272","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.08.022","article-title":"Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomised trial of prophylactic ibuprofen","volume":"195","author":"Hubacher","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.08.003","article-title":"The benefits and risks of using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for contraception","volume":"85","author":"Mansour","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)56455-3","article-title":"Health during prolonged use of levonorgestrel devices: a multicentre study","volume":"61","author":"Sivin","year":"1994","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1104","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a1d3ce","article-title":"Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and endometrial ablation in heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"113","author":"Kaunitz","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(82)90092-0","article-title":"Clinical performance of a new levonorgestrel \u2013releasing intrauterine device. A randomised comparison with a Nova-T Cu-IUD","volume":"25","author":"Nilsson","year":"1982","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01303.x","article-title":"Emerging indications for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS)","volume":"91","author":"Heikinheimo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-200202000-00024","article-title":"Noncontraceptive health benefits of intrauterine devices: a systematic review","volume":"57","author":"Hubacher","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(11)70223-6","article-title":"Intrauterine device use, cervical infection with human papillomavirus, and risk of cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of 26 epidemiological studies","volume":"12","author":"Castellsagu\u00e9","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(02)00417-1","article-title":"Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported?","volume":"67","author":"Harrison-Woolrych","year":"2003","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib27","series-title":"Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices.WHO Technical Report Series 753","first-page":"1","author":"World Health Organization","year":"1987"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(00)00087-1","article-title":"Performance of the frameless Gynefix and the TCu380A IUDs in a 3-year multicentre, randomised, comparative trail in parous women","volume":"61","author":"Wu","year":"2000","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib29","first-page":"131","article-title":"A\u00a0multinational case-control study of ectopic pregnancy","volume":"3","author":"World Health Organization","year":"1985","journal-title":"Clin Reprod Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1994","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des140","article-title":"The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience","volume":"27","author":"Cleland","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib31","first-page":"U538","article-title":"Insertion of intrauterine devices: a comparison of experience with Mirena and Multiload Cu 375 during post-marketing monitoring in New Zealand","volume":"116","author":"Harrison-Woolrych","year":"2003","journal-title":"N\u00a0Z Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.3109\/13625187.2012.700744","article-title":"Intrauterine contraception for Nulliparous women: translating Research into Action (INTRA) group. A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women","volume":"17","author":"Black","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib33","first-page":"1040","article-title":"Topical anesthesia for gynecologic procedures","volume":"73","author":"Rabin","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib34","article-title":"International Medical Advisory Panel. Statement on intrauterine devices","volume":"29","author":"International Planned Parenthood Federation","year":"1995","journal-title":"IPPF Med Bull"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.01.018","article-title":"Management of missing strings in users of intrauterine contraceptives","volume":"86","author":"Marchi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.05.015","article-title":"Interventions for increasing uptake of copper intrauterine devices: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"86","author":"Arrowsmith","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib37","first-page":"230","article-title":"Comparison of levonorgestrel and copper releasing intrauterine contraceptive device on body iron stores and menstrual bleeding patterns: experience on Indian women","volume":"16","author":"Rana","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib38","series-title":"The economics of family planning services: a report prepared for the Contraceptive Alliance","author":"McGuire","year":"1995"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.2165\/00019053-200017020-00009","article-title":"Economic analysis of long term reversible contraceptives","volume":"17","author":"Phillips","year":"2000","journal-title":"Pharmacoeconomics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1456","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.291.12.1456","article-title":"Clinical outcomes and costs with the LNG-IUS or hysterectomy for treatment of menorrhagia: randomised trail 5-year follow-up","volume":"291","author":"Hurskainen","year":"2004","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004_bib41","first-page":"1469493X","article-title":"Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device","volume":"3","author":"Arrowsmith","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693414001047?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693414001047?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,11]],"date-time":"2019-08-11T04:56:38Z","timestamp":1565499398000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693414001047"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,8]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S1521693414001047"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The intrauterine device and the intrauterine system","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.004","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}