{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,18]],"date-time":"2026-03-18T05:17:05Z","timestamp":1773811025670,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":61,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,1]],"date-time":"2019-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554076800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,11]],"date-time":"2019-02-11T18:54:53Z","timestamp":1549911293000},"page":"55-68","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Forceps delivery for non-rotational and rotational operative vaginal delivery"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"56","author":[{"given":"Mairead","family":"Black","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Deirdre J.","family":"Murphy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib1","series-title":"Births in scottish hospitals. Year ending 31st march 2018","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib2","series-title":"Hospital episode statistics: NHS maternity statistics","author":"The Health and Social care Information Centre","year":"2013"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1383","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12265","article-title":"Instrumental vaginal deliveries; are midwives safer practitioners? A retrospective cohort study","volume":"92","author":"Black","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.10.871","article-title":"Cohort study of the decision to delivery interval and neonatal outcome for emergency operative vaginal delivery","volume":"196","author":"Murphy","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib5","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Operative vaginal delivery. Green-top guideline N0.26. https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/globalassets\/documents\/guidelines\/gtg_26.pdf. Updated Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Accessed 01\/13, 2018."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e56","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001147","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 154: operative vaginal delivery","volume":"126","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1436","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90903-K","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal outcome in low-pelvic and midpelvic operative deliveries","volume":"162","author":"Robertson","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib8","first-page":"356","article-title":"Validation of the 1988 ACOG forceps classification system","volume":"77","author":"Hagadorn-Freathy","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e74","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.11.003","article-title":"No. 148-guidelines for operative vaginal birth","volume":"40","author":"Cargill","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043","article-title":"Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French college of gynaecologists and obstetricians","volume":"159","author":"Vayssiere","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib11","volume":"vol. 26","author":"Bahl","year":"2011"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e","article-title":"Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes","volume":"116","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib13","series-title":"Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies","first-page":"CG190","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib14","series-title":"FIGO intrapartum fetal monitoring guidelines","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib15","series-title":"Intrapartum fetal monitoring","year":"2017"},{"issue":"23","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199912023412301","article-title":"Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury","volume":"341","author":"Towner","year":"1999","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1526","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12398","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study","volume":"120","author":"Bahl","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib18","first-page":"CD003766","article-title":"Continuous support for women during childbirth","author":"Hodnett","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105197","article-title":"Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia. the PEOPLE (pushing early or pushing late with epidural) study group","volume":"182","author":"Fraser","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1444","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.13986","article-title":"Effect of immediate vs delayed pushing on rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery among nulliparous women receiving neuraxial analgesia: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"320","author":"Cahill","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Med Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib21","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"5","author":"Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"9987","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61904-8","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Boulvain","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1509117","article-title":"Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35 years of age or older","volume":"374","author":"Walker","year":"2016","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib25","first-page":"j4471","article-title":"Upright versus lying down position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with low dose epidural: BUMPES randomised controlled trial","volume":"359","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"65","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta21650","article-title":"A\u00a0multicentre, randomised controlled trial of position during the late stages of labour in nulliparous women with an epidural: clinical effectiveness and an economic evaluation (BUMPES)","volume":"21","author":"Bick","year":"2017","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-018-2497-7","article-title":"The impact of manual rotation of the occiput posterior position on spontaneous vaginal delivery rate: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (RMOS)","volume":"19","author":"Verhaeghe","year":"2018","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-015-0603-7","article-title":"Persistent occiput posterior position - OUTcomes following manual rotation (POP-OUT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial","volume":"16","author":"Phipps","year":"2015","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.06.033","article-title":"Decision-making in operative vaginal delivery: when to intervene, where to deliver and which instrument to use? Qualitative analysis of expert clinical practice","volume":"170","author":"Bahl","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib30","series-title":"Making decision about investigations and treatment","author":"General Medical Council","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib31","series-title":"The Supreme Court. Judgement: montgomery (appellant) vs Lanarkshire health board (respondent) (scotland)","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib32","series-title":"Consent advice no. 11 Operative vaginal delivery","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","year":"2010"},{"issue":"7435","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.37942.546076.44","article-title":"Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study","volume":"328","author":"Bahl","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182695581","article-title":"Use and safety of Kielland's forceps in current obstetric practice","volume":"120","author":"Burke","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6155","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.1.6155.7","article-title":"Kielland's forceps: association with neonatal morbidity and mortality","volume":"1","author":"Chiswick","year":"1979","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000221","article-title":"Rotational vaginal delivery with Kielland's forceps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes","volume":"27","author":"Al Wattar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.03.031","article-title":"Rotational forceps versus manual rotation and direct forceps: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"212","author":"O'Brien","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib38","series-title":"COMET initiative","author":"The Comet Initiative","year":"2019"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00145.x","article-title":"Evaluating maternity care: a core set of outcome measures","volume":"34","author":"Devane","year":"2007","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib40","first-page":"CD005455","article-title":"Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery","volume":"11","author":"O'Mahony","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E764","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.161156","article-title":"Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station","volume":"189","author":"Muraca","year":"2017","journal-title":"CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J)"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14820","article-title":"Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality among term singletons following midcavity operative vaginal delivery versus caesarean delivery","volume":"125","author":"Muraca","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3422-4","article-title":"The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry","volume":"29","author":"van Bavel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2012-001649","article-title":"Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study","volume":"2","author":"Laine","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001533","article-title":"Simulation training for forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and rates of maternal perineal trauma","volume":"128","author":"Gossett","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1022","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13395","article-title":"Urinary incontinence persisting after childbirth: extent, delivery history, and effects in a 12-year longitudinal cohort study","volume":"123","author":"MacArthur","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14891","article-title":"Forceps delivery is associated with increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse and muscle trauma: a cross-sectional study 16-24 years after first delivery","volume":"46","author":"Volloyhaug","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib48","first-page":"1","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with forceps delivery versus cesarean delivery","author":"Liu","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-12-138","article-title":"Mode of birth and women's psychological and physical wellbeing in the postnatal period","volume":"12","author":"Rowlands","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03188.x","article-title":"Mode of delivery and postpartum emotional distress: a cohort study of 55,814 women","volume":"119","author":"Adams","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e185","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2017.09.006","article-title":"A\u00a0qualitative study showing women's participation and empowerment in instrumental vaginal births","volume":"31","author":"Sjodin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.67","article-title":"Cohort study of maternal views on future mode of delivery following operative delivery in the second stage of labor","volume":"188","author":"Murphy","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.3928\/01913913-20151014-50","article-title":"Forceps delivery-related ophthalmic injuries: a case series","volume":"52","author":"McAnena","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14471.x","article-title":"External ocular trauma in instrumental and normal deliveries","volume":"99","author":"Holden","year":"1992","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)06341-3","article-title":"Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in the second stage of labour: a cohort study","volume":"358","author":"Murphy","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.01463.x","article-title":"Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care","volume":"110","author":"Murphy","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.034","article-title":"Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years after operative delivery in the second stage of labor: a cohort study","volume":"197","author":"Bahl","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib58","first-page":"CD004944","article-title":"Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean section","volume":"1","author":"Waterfall","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib59","first-page":"93","article-title":"Second stage caesarean section: evaluation of patwardhan technique","volume":"8","author":"Saha","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Diagn Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.09.019","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of elevation of the fetal head with a fetal pillow during cesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation","volume":"133","author":"Seal","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"7424","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1132","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7424.1132","article-title":"Women's views on the impact of operative delivery in the second stage of labour: qualitative interview study","volume":"327","author":"Murphy","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693419300082?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693419300082?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T17:09:18Z","timestamp":1761498558000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693419300082"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"references-count":61,"alternative-id":["S1521693419300082"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Forceps delivery for non-rotational and rotational operative vaginal delivery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.02.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}