{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T18:19:43Z","timestamp":1792693183571,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":79,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,1]],"date-time":"2020-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1588291200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,1]],"date-time":"2020-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1588291200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100012719","name":"Scottish Microbiology Association","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100012719","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000082","name":"Division of Graduate Education","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000082","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100015250","name":"NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["IS-BRC-1215-20007"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["IS-BRC-1215-20007"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100015250","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]],"date-time":"2019-11-18T12:01:07Z","timestamp":1574078467000},"page":"3-17","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":77,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Risk-based breast cancer screening strategies in women"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"65","author":[{"given":"Elaine F.","family":"Harkness","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Susan M.","family":"Astley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D.Gareth","family":"Evans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib1","series-title":"Breast cancer","volume":"1\u20132","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib2","series-title":"Births by parents' characteristics in England and Wales: 2016","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib3","series-title":"Childbearing for women born in different years, England and Wales, 2017","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib4","article-title":"The global and regional survival rate of women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","author":"Maajani","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin Breast Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(08)70179-7","article-title":"Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD)","volume":"9","author":"Coleman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib6","series-title":"Familial breast cancer\u00a0: classification , care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer (CG164)","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"971","DOI":"10.1259\/0007-1285-65-779-971","article-title":"One-view versus two-view mammography in baseline screening for breast cancer: a review","volume":"65","author":"van Dijck","year":"1992","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1773","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa052911","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening","volume":"353","author":"Pisano","year":"2005","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-016-4059-6","article-title":"Triple-negative breast cancer has worse overall survival and cause-specific survival than non-triple-negative breast cancer","volume":"161","author":"Li","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast Canc Res Treat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.32211","article-title":"Systematic reviews as a \u201clens of evidence\u201d: determinants of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening","author":"Mandrik","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2017.11.002","article-title":"Mammography screening: a major issue in medicine","volume":"90","author":"Autier","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2205","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2013.177","article-title":"The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review","volume":"108","author":"Marmot","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib13","series-title":"NHS breast screening: helping you decide","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20150960","article-title":"No strong evidence for increased risk of breast cancer 8\u201326 years after multiple mammograms in their 30s in females at moderate and high familial risk","volume":"89","author":"Evans","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib15","series-title":"Routes to diagnosis 2006-2016 year breakdown","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib16","series-title":"Breast screening interval cancers explained infographic","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib17","series-title":"NHS Breast Screening Programme: Reporting, classification and monitoring of interval cancers and cancers following previous assessment","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.17.18120","article-title":"Harms of restrictive risk-based mammographic breast cancer screening","volume":"210","author":"Neal","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2017.11.021","article-title":"Personalised screening: is this the way forward?","volume":"73","author":"Gilbert","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034","article-title":"Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"McCormack","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-014-0439-1","article-title":"Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case\u2013control study of six alternative density assessment methods","volume":"16","author":"Eng","year":"2014","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-018-0932-z","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study","volume":"20","author":"Astley","year":"2018","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib23","series-title":"Additional screening with ultrasound after negative mammography screening in women with dense breasts\u00a0: a systematic review","author":"Patterson","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib24","series-title":"ACR BI-RADS Atlas - mammography","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1801","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/90.23.1801","article-title":"Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the american college of radiology breast imaging reporting and data system","volume":"90","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"1998","journal-title":"J\u00a0Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/87.9.670","article-title":"Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian national breast screening study","volume":"87","author":"Boyd","year":"1995","journal-title":"J\u00a0Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib27","first-page":"1013608","article-title":"Visual assessment of breast density using Visual Analogue Scales: observer variability, reader attributes and reading time","volume":"vol. 10136","author":"Ang","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr2123","article-title":"Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view","volume":"10","author":"Duffy","year":"2008","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"710","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2015151261","article-title":"Comparison of clinical and automated breast density measurements: implications for risk prediction and supplemental screening","volume":"279","author":"Brandt","year":"2016","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib30","series-title":"Med Imaging 2017 Comput. Diagnosis","article-title":"Does the prediction of breast cancer improve using a combination of mammographic density measures compared to individual measures alone?","author":"Wong Sik Hee","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-016-0778-1","article-title":"Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status","volume":"18","author":"Malkov","year":"2016","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2018180179","article-title":"Radiomic phenotypes of mammographic parenchymal complexity: toward augmenting breast density in breast cancer risk assessment","volume":"290","author":"Kontos","year":"2018","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib33","first-page":"1","article-title":"Prediction of reader estimates of mammographic density using convolutional neural networks","volume":"6","author":"Ionescu","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Med Imaging"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib34","first-page":"11669","volume":"84","author":"Federal Register","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fed Regist"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-015-3534-9","article-title":"Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel","volume":"153","author":"Freer","year":"2015","journal-title":"Breast Canc Res Treat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2407-8-155","article-title":"Penetrance estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 based on genetic testing in a Clinical Cancer Genetics service setting: risks of breast\/ovarian cancer quoted should reflect the cancer burden in the family","volume":"8","author":"Evans","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMC Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajhg.2018.11.002","article-title":"Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes","volume":"104","author":"Mavaddat","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Hum Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-017-4247-z","article-title":"Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications","volume":"164","author":"Cintolo-Gonzalez","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast Canc Res Treat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1038\/s41416-019-0476-8","article-title":"A\u00a0systematic review and quality assessment of individualised breast cancer risk prediction models","author":"Louro","year":"2019","journal-title":"Br J Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1580","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6602175","article-title":"The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer","volume":"91","author":"Antoniou","year":"2004","journal-title":"Br J Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1457","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6604305","article-title":"The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer: updates and extensions","volume":"98","author":"Antoniou","year":"2008","journal-title":"Br J Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2013.730","article-title":"Boadicea breast cancer risk prediction model: updates to cancer incidences, tumour pathology and web interface","volume":"110","author":"Lee","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1668","article-title":"A\u00a0breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors","volume":"23","author":"Tyrer","year":"2004","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-015-0653-5","article-title":"Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort","volume":"17","author":"Brentnall","year":"2015","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1879","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/81.24.1879","article-title":"Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually","volume":"81","author":"Gail","year":"1989","journal-title":"J\u00a0Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1541","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/91.18.1541","article-title":"Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence","volume":"91","author":"Costantino","year":"1999","journal-title":"J\u00a0Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-148-5-200803040-00004","article-title":"Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer Risk\u00a0: development and validation of","volume":"148","author":"Tice","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-019-05167-2","article-title":"Validation of the breast cancer surveillance consortium model of breast cancer risk","author":"Tice","year":"2019","journal-title":"Breast Canc Res Treat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib49","article-title":"Genetic testing to guide risk-stratified screens for breast cancer","volume":"9","author":"Willoughby","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Personalized Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2017.4881","article-title":"Use of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and mammographic density plus classic risk factors for breast cancer risk prediction","volume":"4","author":"Van Veen","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib51","first-page":"1","article-title":"BOADICEA: a comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating genetic and nongenetic risk factors","volume":"0","author":"Lee","year":"2019","journal-title":"Genet Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djq088","article-title":"Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models","volume":"102","author":"Amir","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"R144","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr3352","article-title":"Breast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performance","volume":"14","author":"Quante","year":"2012","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-18-1039","article-title":"Comparison of questionnaire-based breast cancer prediction models in the Nurses' Health Study","author":"Glynn","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(18)30902-1","article-title":"10-Year performance of four models of breast cancer risk: a validation study","volume":"20","author":"Terry","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib57","article-title":"Comparative validation of breast cancer risk prediction models and projections for future risk stratification","author":"Choudhury","year":"2019","journal-title":"JNCI (J Natl Cancer Inst)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.29245\/2578-2967\/2018\/4.1137","article-title":"Bridging the data gap in breast cancer risk assessment to enable widespread clinical implementation across the multiethnic landscape of the US","volume":"2","author":"Spaeth","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Cancer Treat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1038\/538161a","article-title":"Genomics is failing on diversity","author":"Popejoy","year":"2016","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djy013","article-title":"Breast cancer risk model requirements for counseling, prevention, and screening","volume":"110","author":"Gail","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.01.002","article-title":"Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening","volume":"27","author":"Hodgson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta19040","article-title":"The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme \u2013 a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with","volume":"19","author":"Gilbert","year":"2015","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.05.017","article-title":"Breast cancer screening controversies: who, when, why, and how?","volume":"40","author":"Chetlen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"862","DOI":"10.4103\/jcrt.JCRT_678_17","article-title":"Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and mammography for breast cancer","volume":"13","author":"Zhang","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Cancer Res Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib65","series-title":"Breast cancer Dutch guideline version 2.0","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib66","series-title":"Contrast agent toxicity - StatPearls - NCBI bookshelf","author":"Kaller","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2041","DOI":"10.1159\/000489443","article-title":"Diagnostic value of nineteen different imaging methods for patients with breast cancer: a network meta-analysis","volume":"46","author":"Zhang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cell Physiol Biochem"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib68","series-title":"Continuous Update Project Expert Report. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and breast cancer","author":"World Cancer Research Fund\/American Institute for Cancer Research","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00005","article-title":"Use of medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive services Task Force","volume":"158","author":"Nelson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djv318","article-title":"Breast cancer chemoprevention: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"108","author":"Mocellin","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1136\/jmg.2008.062232","article-title":"Risk reducing mastectomy: outcomes in 10 European centres","volume":"46","author":"Evans","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Med Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib72","series-title":"NHS breast screening programme: England 2016-17","author":"National Statistics","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.2147\/BCTT.S123558","article-title":"Economic analysis of the breast cancer screening program used by the UK NHS\u00a0: should the program be maintained?","volume":"9","author":"Morton","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Targets Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1504","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2018.1901","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness and benefit-to-harm ratio of risk-stratified screening for breast cancer: a life-table model","volume":"4","author":"Pashayan","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2017.04.012","article-title":"Evaluation of a stratified national breast screening program in the United Kingdom: an early model-based cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"20","author":"Gray","year":"2017","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1275","DOI":"10.1080\/0284186X.2018.1481291","article-title":"Women's perceptions of the adoption of personalised risk-based breast cancer screening and primary prevention: a systematic review","volume":"57","author":"Rainey","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Oncol (Madr)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0197772","article-title":"Women's decision-making regarding risk-stratified breast cancer screening and prevention from the perspective of international healthcare professionals","volume":"13","author":"Rainey","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2018.11.002","article-title":"Consumer and clinician perspectives on personalising breast cancer prevention information","volume":"43","author":"Keogh","year":"2019","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2016.56","article-title":"Breast cancer risk feedback to women in the UK NHS breast screening population","volume":"114","author":"Evans","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005_bib80","article-title":"Implementing a population-based breast cancer risk assessment program","author":"Silver","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin Breast Canc"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693419301695?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693419301695?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T17:11:41Z","timestamp":1761498701000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693419301695"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,5]]},"references-count":79,"alternative-id":["S1521693419301695"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Risk-based breast cancer screening strategies in women","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.005","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}