{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T00:29:30Z","timestamp":1792628970100,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":63,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,1]],"date-time":"2020-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1580515200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,1]],"date-time":"2020-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1580515200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,9]],"date-time":"2020-01-09T11:47:39Z","timestamp":1578570459000},"page":"37-44","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":86,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Modern methods to induce abortion: Safety, efficacy and choice"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"63","author":[{"given":"Nathalie","family":"Kapp","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Patricia A.","family":"Lohr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"10041","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)30380-4","article-title":"Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends","volume":"388","author":"Sedgh","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib2","series-title":"Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2012"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823fe923","article-title":"The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States","volume":"119","author":"Raymond","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1489","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13552","article-title":"Facility-based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: a review of evidence from 26 countries","volume":"123","author":"Singh","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaeco"},{"issue":"10110","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2372","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(17)31794-4","article-title":"Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010-14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model","volume":"390","author":"Ganatra","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.2471\/BLT.14.136333","article-title":"From concept to measurement: operationalizing WHO\u2019s definition of unsafe abortion","volume":"92","author":"Ganatra","year":"2014","journal-title":"Bull World Health Organ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib7","series-title":"Trends in the method and gestational age of abortion in high-income countries","author":"Popinchalk","year":"2019"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01765.x","article-title":"Abortion-related complications in Cambodia","volume":"115","author":"Fetters","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaeco"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1363\/3600610","article-title":"Caring for women with abortion complications in Ethiopia: national estimates and future implications","volume":"36","author":"Gebreselassie","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2011.05.018","article-title":"Confronting the challenge of unsafe second-trimester abortion","volume":"115","author":"Harris","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1007\/s11113-019-09517-2","article-title":"Estimating abortion incidence: assessment of a widely used indirect method","volume":"38","author":"Singh","year":"2019","journal-title":"Popul Res Pol Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000116260.81570.60","article-title":"Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States","volume":"103","author":"Bartlett","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"31 Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/S0968-8080(08)31379-2","article-title":"Complications after second trimester surgical and medical abortion","volume":"16","author":"Grossman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Reprod Health Matters"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000945","article-title":"Abortion-related mortality in the United States: 1998-2010","volume":"126","author":"Zane","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01572.x","article-title":"Manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester abortion: a systematic review","volume":"115","author":"Wen","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaeco"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1564","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.114858","article-title":"Comparison of pain and time of procedures with two first-trimester abortion techniques performed by residents and faculty","volume":"184","author":"Edelman","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000910","article-title":"Medical compared with surgical abortion for effective pregnancy termination in the first trimester","volume":"126","author":"Ireland","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2015.07.013","article-title":"Complications from first-trimester aspiration abortion: a systematic review of the literature","volume":"92","author":"White","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.11.001","article-title":"Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks' gestation: SFP guideline #2013-4","volume":"89","author":"Fox","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib20","article-title":"Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion","author":"Lohr","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.11.016","article-title":"Recent advances in second-trimester abortion: an evidence-based review","volume":"200","author":"Hammond","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1982.03330050041028","article-title":"Dilatation and evacuation procedures and second-trimester abortions. The role of physician skill and hospital setting","volume":"248","author":"Cates","year":"1982","journal-title":"Jama"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1394","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000431056.79334.cc","article-title":"Practice bulletin No. 135: second-trimester abortion","volume":"121","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123887","article-title":"A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortion","volume":"187","author":"Autry","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820c3d26","article-title":"Second-trimester abortion for fetal anomalies or fetal death: labor induction compared with dilation and evacuation","volume":"117","author":"Bryant","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/1742-4755-6-16","article-title":"Audit of short term outcomes of surgical and medical second trimester termination of pregnancy","volume":"6","author":"Mauelshagen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d43f42","article-title":"Effect of prior cesarean delivery on risk of second-trimester surgical abortion complications","volume":"115","author":"Frick","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-11-224","article-title":"Surgical and medical second trimester abortion in South Africa: a cross-sectional study","volume":"11","author":"Grossman","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib29","series-title":"Abortion care","article-title":"National institute for health and care excellence (NICE)","year":"2019"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000603","article-title":"Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion","volume":"125","author":"Upadhyay","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib31","first-page":"CD002855","article-title":"Medical methods for first trimester abortion","author":"Kulier","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.11.002","article-title":"Medical abortion in the late first trimester: a systematic review","volume":"99","author":"Kapp","year":"2019","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib33","first-page":"CD005216","article-title":"Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy","author":"Wildschut","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000897","article-title":"Mifepristone with buccal misoprostol for medical abortion: a systematic review","volume":"126","author":"Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2012.06.011","article-title":"First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review","volume":"87","author":"Raymond","year":"2013","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12398","article-title":"Medical abortion with mifepristone and home administration of misoprostol up to 63 days\u2019 gestation","volume":"93","author":"Lokeland","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.10.018","article-title":"A two-pill sublingual misoprostol outpatient regimen following mifepristone for medical abortion through 70 days\u2019 LMP: a prospective comparative open-label trial","volume":"89","author":"Bracken","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1070","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31826c315f","article-title":"Extending outpatient medical abortion services through 70 days of gestational age","volume":"120","author":"Winikoff","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1304","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000289577.32274.a5","article-title":"Mifepristone in second-trimester medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"110","author":"Kapp","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1077","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001688","article-title":"Simultaneous administration compared with a 24-hour mifepristone-misoprostol interval in second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"128","author":"Abbas","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318227214e","article-title":"Mifepristone and misoprostol compared with misoprostol alone for second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"118","author":"Ngoc","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.02.005","article-title":"Clinical guidelines, labor induction abortion in the second trimester","volume":"84","author":"Borgatta","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2003.09.006","article-title":"Midtrimester medical termination of pregnancy: a review of 1002 consecutive cases","volume":"69","author":"Ashok","year":"2004","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.02.023","article-title":"A double-blind randomized controlled trial of mifepristone or placebo before buccal misoprostol for abortion at 14-21 weeks of pregnancy","volume":"130","author":"Dabash","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1080\/13625187.2016.1258461","article-title":"Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone followed by unlimited dosing of buccal misoprostol in Armenia","volume":"22","author":"Louie","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1117","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31819dbfe2","article-title":"Uterine rupture in second-trimester misoprostol-induced abortion after cesarean delivery: a systematic review","volume":"113","author":"Goyal","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003017","article-title":"Efficacy of misoprostol alone for first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review","volume":"133","author":"Raymond","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den328","article-title":"Comparison of vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for second trimester abortion: randomized controlled equivalence trial","volume":"24","author":"von Hertzen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2008.00831.x","article-title":"A randomised comparative study on sublingual versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy between 13 to 20 weeks","volume":"48","author":"Bhattacharjee","year":"2008","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1001","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00222.x","article-title":"A prospective randomised comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy","volume":"111","author":"Tang","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaeco"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.3.709","article-title":"A comparison of two regimens of intravaginal misoprostol for termination of second trimester pregnancy: a randomized comparative trial","volume":"15","author":"Wong","year":"2000","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib53","series-title":"Feasibility of a hospital outpatient day procedure for medication abortion at 13-18weeks gestation: findings from Nepal","author":"Blum","year":"2019"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002692","article-title":"Safety of deep sedation without intubation for second-trimester dilation and evacuation","volume":"132","author":"Aksel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6906","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.307.6906.714","article-title":"Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women\u2019s preferences and acceptability of treatment","volume":"307","author":"Henshaw","year":"1993","journal-title":"BMJ Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1288","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10007.x","article-title":"A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care","volume":"105","author":"Slade","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1859","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2018.06.012","article-title":"Decision satisfaction among women choosing a method of pregnancy termination in the setting of fetal anomalies and other pregnancy complications: a qualitative study","volume":"101","author":"Kerns","year":"2018","journal-title":"Patient Educ Counsel"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03310.x","article-title":"Acceptability of misoprostol-only medical termination of pregnancy compared with vacuum aspiration: an international, multicentre trial","volume":"119","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaeco"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2011.10.016","article-title":"Women\u2019s decision making regarding choice of second trimester termination method for pregnancy complications","volume":"116","author":"Kerns","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.00044.x-i1","article-title":"Mifepristone and misoprostol versus dilation and evacuation for midtrimester abortion: a pilot randomised controlled trial","volume":"111","author":"Grimes","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaeco"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1512","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02712.x","article-title":"Comparing medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13-20 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"117","author":"Kelly","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaeco"},{"issue":"53","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta13530","article-title":"Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks\u2019 gestation (TOPS)","volume":"13","author":"Robson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib63","article-title":"Medical versus surgical methods for first trimester termination of pregnancy","author":"Say","year":"2005","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008_bib64","series-title":"Sepsis and medical abortion","author":"FDA public health advisory","year":"2010"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693419301762?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693419301762?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T17:10:58Z","timestamp":1761498658000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693419301762"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"references-count":63,"alternative-id":["S1521693419301762"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Modern methods to induce abortion: Safety, efficacy and choice","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}