{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]],"date-time":"2026-04-01T17:29:35Z","timestamp":1775064575952,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630454400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630454400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630454400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630454400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630454400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630454400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630454400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,21]],"date-time":"2021-02-21T09:40:56Z","timestamp":1613900456000},"page":"113-122","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy: Considerations on surgical approach"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"75","author":[{"given":"Gloria","family":"Salvo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rene","family":"Pareja","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pedro T.","family":"Ramirez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib1","series-title":"Global cancer observatory (GLOBOCAN)","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib2","series-title":"Cancer facts & figures 2020. CA cancer J clin","first-page":"1","year":"2020"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib3","first-page":"105","article-title":"Pregnancies following radical trachelectomy for invasive cervical cancer","volume":"52","author":"Dargent","year":"1994","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.04.027","article-title":"Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case-control study","volume":"110","author":"Beiner","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.03.009","article-title":"Oncological safety of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LARVT or Dargent's operation): a comparative study with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH)","volume":"106","author":"Marchiole","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2013.06.010","article-title":"Surgical, oncological, and obstetrical outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy - a systematic literature review","volume":"131","author":"Pareja","year":"2013","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1085","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002613","article-title":"Trends in use and survival associated with fertility-sparing trachelectomy for young women with early-stage cervical cancer","volume":"131","author":"Cui","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003952","article-title":"Radical trachelectomy for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review","volume":"136","author":"Smith","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1196","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10946.x","article-title":"Abdominal radical trachelectomy: a new surgical technique for the conservative management of cervical carcinoma","volume":"104","author":"Smith","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.09.007","article-title":"Radical vaginal versus abdominal trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: a comparison of surgical and pathologic outcomes","volume":"112","author":"Einstein","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60244-7","article-title":"Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for stage Ib1 cervical cancer","volume":"10","author":"Lee","year":"2003","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscopists"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.05.034","article-title":"Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy","volume":"111","author":"Persson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2007.0236","article-title":"Robotically assisted total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for fertility sparing in stage IB1 adenosarcoma of the cervix","volume":"18","author":"Geisler","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1806395","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer","volume":"379","author":"Ramirez","year":"2018","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15621","article-title":"Oncological results and recurrent risk factors following abdominal radical trachelectomy: an updated series of 333 patients","author":"Li","year":"2019","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.09.035","article-title":"Fertility sparing surgery for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: open vs. robotic radical trachelectomy","volume":"124","author":"Nick","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2015.06.023","article-title":"Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery","volume":"138","author":"Vieira","year":"2015","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"677","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2015.11.009","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: case report and review of literature","volume":"23","author":"Api","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e240","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(16)30032-8","article-title":"Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: a systematic review","volume":"17","author":"Bentivegna","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1905","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1804923","article-title":"Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer","volume":"379","author":"Melamed","year":"2018","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1019","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2020.1694","article-title":"Survival after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"6","author":"Nitecki","year":"2020","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000323","article-title":"Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina)","volume":"29","author":"Odetto","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.19.03012","article-title":"Recurrence rates in patients with cervical cancer treated with abdominal versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective review study","volume":"38","author":"Uppal","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.07.009","article-title":"Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer","volume":"221","author":"Cusimano","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(20)30081-4","article-title":"Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial","volume":"21","author":"Frumovitz","year":"2020","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.038","article-title":"Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy","volume":"220","author":"Matsuo","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000273","article-title":"International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study","volume":"29","author":"Salvo","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2020.01.015","article-title":"Association between hospital surgical volume and perioperative outcomes of fertility-sparing trachelectomy for cervical cancer: a national study in the United States","volume":"157","author":"Matsuo","year":"2020","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3069","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.19.01164","article-title":"Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: when adoption of a novel treatment precedes prospective, randomized evidence","volume":"37","author":"Melamed","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000356","article-title":"Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic\/oncology: enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) society recommendations - 2019 update","volume":"29","author":"Nelson","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1417","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2019-000622","article-title":"Impact of compliance with an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway on patient outcomes in open gynecologic surgery","volume":"29","author":"Iniesta","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Canc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2010.12.352","article-title":"Conservative management of early stage cervical cancer: is there a role for less radical surgery?","volume":"120","author":"Schmeler","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2004.05.032","article-title":"Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature","volume":"94","author":"Plante","year":"2004","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2013.09.004","article-title":"Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care?","volume":"132","author":"Ramirez","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1136\/ijgc-2019-001146","article-title":"International gynecologic cancer society 2019 meeting summary","volume":"30","author":"Ramirez","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Canc"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693421000183?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693421000183?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T17:12:10Z","timestamp":1761498730000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693421000183"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]},"references-count":35,"alternative-id":["S1521693421000183"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy: Considerations on surgical approach","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}