{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,23]],"date-time":"2026-04-23T21:18:15Z","timestamp":1776979095652,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":103,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,19]],"date-time":"2022-11-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1668816000000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":383,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,3]],"date-time":"2021-09-03T11:43:17Z","timestamp":1630669397000},"page":"27-41","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Preterm and term prelabour rupture of membranes: A review of timing and methods of labour induction"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"77","author":[{"given":"Pierre","family":"Delorme","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9654-8104","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elsa","family":"Lorthe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jeanne","family":"Sibiude","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8218-8814","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gilles","family":"Kayem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib1","first-page":"178","article-title":"Preterm premature rupture of the membranes","volume":"101","author":"Mercer","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9606","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(08)60074-4","article-title":"Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth","volume":"371","author":"Goldenberg","year":"2008","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.05.029","article-title":"Preterm premature rupture of membranes at 22-25 weeks' gestation: perinatal and 2-year outcomes within a national population-based study (EPIPAGE-2)","volume":"219","author":"Lorthe","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2016.11.074","article-title":"Impact of latency duration on the prognosis of preterm infants after preterm premature rupture of membranes at 24 to 32 weeks' gestation: a national population-based cohort study","volume":"182","author":"Lorthe","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Pediatr"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.112.4.943","article-title":"School-age outcomes in children who were extremely low birth weight from four international population-based cohorts","volume":"112","author":"Saigal","year":"2003","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-devpsych-121318-084804","article-title":"The life course consequences of very preterm birth","volume":"1","author":"Wolke","year":"2019","journal-title":"Annu Rev Psychol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2017.07.012","article-title":"Preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes: a disease of the fetal membranes","volume":"41","author":"Menon","year":"2017","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib8","first-page":"Cd001058","article-title":"Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes","author":"Kenyon","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib9","first-page":"671","article-title":"Premature rupture of membranes at term in nulliparous women: a hazard?","volume":"76","author":"Cammu","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"16","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199604183341601","article-title":"Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM study group","volume":"334","author":"Hannah","year":"1996","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib11","first-page":"e1","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 188: prelabor rupture of membranes","volume":"131","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib12","series-title":"WHO recommendations for induction of labour","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib13","series-title":"Clinical guidelines. intrapartum care for healthy women and babies","year":"2017"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib14","first-page":"15","article-title":"Term prelabor rupture of membranes: CNGOF guidelines for clinical practice - short text","volume":"48","author":"Senat","year":"2020","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib15","series-title":"Term prelabour rupture of membranes (Term PROM)","year":"2010"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1673","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15397","article-title":"Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study","volume":"125","author":"Dos Santos","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e80","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003700","article-title":"Prelabor rupture of membranes: ACOG practice bulletin, number 217","volume":"135","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib18","first-page":"CD004735","article-title":"Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome","volume":"3","author":"Bond","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.02.021","article-title":"Preterm premature rupture of the membranes: guidelines for clinical practice from the French college of gynaecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"236","author":"Schmitz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib20","first-page":"1068","article-title":"Modalities of birth in case of uncomplicated preterm premature rupture of membranes: CNGOF preterm premature rupture of membranes guidelines","volume":"46","author":"Delorme","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e152","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15803","article-title":"Care of women presenting with suspected preterm prelabour rupture of membranes from 24(+0) weeks of gestation: green-top guideline no. 73","volume":"126","author":"Thomson","year":"2019","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(15)33270-1","article-title":"Prospective randomized study of corticosteroids in the management of premature rupture of the membranes and the premature gestation","volume":"141","author":"Garite","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90419-3","article-title":"Management of preterm prematurely ruptured membranes: a prospective randomized comparison of observation versus use of steroids and timed delivery","volume":"151","author":"Iams","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib24","first-page":"196","article-title":"Preterm premature rupture of the membranes with fetal pulmonary maturity present: a prospective study","volume":"69","author":"Spinnato","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90004-3","article-title":"Induction versus expectant management in premature rupture of the membranes with mature amniotic fluid at 32 to 36 weeks: a randomized trial","volume":"169","author":"Mercer","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib26","first-page":"55","article-title":"Premature rupture of membranes: a prospective, randomized evaluation of steroids, latent phase, and expectant management","volume":"66","author":"Nelson","year":"1985","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00303-9","article-title":"Intentional delivery versus expectant management with preterm ruptured membranes at 30-34 weeks' gestation","volume":"86","author":"Cox","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib28","first-page":"43","article-title":"Conservative management of premature membrane rupture in pregnancy of 28-34 weeks. Aleatory clinical trial","volume":"65","author":"Eroiz-Hern\u00e1ndez","year":"1997","journal-title":"Ginecolog Obstet Mex"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.718388","article-title":"Effects of intentional delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"26","author":"Al-Mandeel","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.11.024","article-title":"Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: a multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY)","volume":"233","author":"Pasquier","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"970","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2012.15","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes are associated with latency after preterm premature rupture of membranes","volume":"32","author":"Nayot","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinatol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"710","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30861-6","article-title":"Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: effect of latency on neonatal and maternal outcomes","volume":"35","author":"Frenette","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2274","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1731465","article-title":"The effects of latency period in PPROM cases managed expectantly","volume":"33","author":"Baser","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2016.11.074","article-title":"Impact of latency duration on the prognosis of preterm infants after preterm premature rupture of membranes at 24 to 32 weeks' gestation: a national population-based cohort study","volume":"182","author":"Lorthe","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Pediatr"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.07.045","article-title":"Preterm premature rupture of membranes: does the duration of latency influence perinatal outcomes?","volume":"201","author":"Manuck","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2008.10.017","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes after elective delivery management of preterm premature rupture of the membranes before 34 weeks' gestation (DOMINOS study)","volume":"143","author":"Pasquier","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1629","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14133","article-title":"Prolonged latency of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and neurodevelopmental outcomes: a secondary analysis","volume":"123","author":"Drassinower","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.10.020","article-title":"Effect of latency period after premature rupture of membranes on 2 years infant mortality (DOMINOS study)","volume":"135","author":"Pasquier","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.015","article-title":"Labor induction in the patient with preterm premature rupture of membranes","volume":"39","author":"Packard","year":"2015","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"1 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70638-6","article-title":"Premature rupture of membranes at 34 to 37 weeks' gestation: aggressive versus conservative management","volume":"178","author":"Naef","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.07.024","article-title":"Management of late-preterm premature rupture of membranes: the PPROMEXIL-2 trial","volume":"207","author":"van der Ham","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10017","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00724-2","article-title":"Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial","volume":"387","author":"Morris","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001208","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"9","author":"van der Ham","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002447","article-title":"Immediate delivery compared with expectant management in late preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: an individual participant data meta-analysis","volume":"131","author":"Quist-Nelson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1263","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12889","article-title":"Using vaginal Group B Streptococcus colonisation in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes to guide the decision for immediate delivery: a secondary analysis of the PPROMEXIL trials","volume":"121","author":"Tajik","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.07.014","article-title":"Behavioural and neurodevelopmental outcome of 2-year-old children after preterm premature rupture of membranes: follow-up of a randomised clinical trial comparing induction of labour and expectant management","volume":"194","author":"van der Heyden","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14302","article-title":"An economic evaluation of planned immediate versus delayed birth for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: findings from the PPROMT randomised controlled trial","volume":"124","author":"Lain","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12329","article-title":"Economic analysis comparing induction of labor and expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (PPROMEXIL trial)","volume":"93","author":"Vijgen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.038","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized trial of foley bulb for labor induction in premature rupture of membranes in nulliparas (FLIP)","volume":"217","author":"Amorosa","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002374","article-title":"Foley plus oxytocin compared with oxytocin for induction after membrane rupture: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"131","author":"Mackeen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib51","first-page":"206","article-title":"Prostaglandin E2 gel versus misoprostol for cervical ripening in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks","volume":"99","author":"Frohn","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib52","article-title":"Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"12","author":"Ghosh","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib53","article-title":"Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour","volume":"10","author":"Smith","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib54","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"10","author":"de Vaan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib55","article-title":"Buccal or sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"4","author":"Muzonzini","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib56","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"2010","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib57","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for induction of labour","volume":"2014","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib58","article-title":"Mifepristone for induction of labour","volume":"2009","author":"Hapangama","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib59","article-title":"Oral prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour","author":"French","year":"2001","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib60","first-page":"CD003246","article-title":"Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"4","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00024","article-title":"Prelabor rupture of membranes at term: induction techniques","volume":"49","author":"Mozurkewich","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00031-L","article-title":"Comparison of 12- and 72-hour expectant management of premature rupture of membranes in term pregnancies","volume":"85","author":"Shalev","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349309021155","article-title":"Management of prelabor rupture of membranes at term. a randomized study","volume":"72","author":"Sperling","year":"1993","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib64","first-page":"93","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of early and delayed induction of labor with spontaneous rupture of membranes at term","volume":"74","author":"Wagner","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00214-C","article-title":"Premature rupture of membranes in nulliparas at term with unfavorable cervices: a double-blind randomized trial of prostaglandin and placebo","volume":"86","author":"Chua","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1992.tb01892.x","article-title":"Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term and unfavourable cervix; a randomized placebo-controlled trial on early intervention with intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel","volume":"32","author":"Chung","year":"1992","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(94)00316-6","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized trial of management of pre-labor rupture of membranes at term in multiparous women using vaginal prostaglandin gel","volume":"85","author":"Mahmood","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib68","first-page":"356","article-title":"The efficacy of dinoprostone vaginal insert for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"39","author":"Bezircioglu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-012-0172-6","article-title":"Premature rupture of membrane at term: early induction versus expectant management","volume":"62","author":"Shah","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994615","article-title":"Intracervical prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes and an unripe cervix","volume":"11","author":"Gonen","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib71","first-page":"607","article-title":"Contribution of intracervical PGE2 administration in premature rupture of the membranes at term. Prospective randomised clinical trial","volume":"29","author":"Hidar","year":"2000","journal-title":"J\u00a0Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2007.026","article-title":"Induction of labor with oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes at term in women with unfavorable cervix: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial","volume":"35","author":"Levy","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1354","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2002.02082.x","article-title":"Active management of term prelabour rupture of membranes with oral misoprostol","volume":"109","author":"Shetty","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib74","first-page":"685","article-title":"Ruptured membranes at term: randomized, double-blind trial of oral misoprostol for labor induction","volume":"101","author":"Lo","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)00337-4","article-title":"Oral misoprostol vs. placebo in the management of prelabor rupture of membranes at term","volume":"72","author":"Hoffmann","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1128","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340600589636","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: a randomized control trial","volume":"85","author":"Cheung","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00030-9","article-title":"Intravaginal misoprostol vs. expectant management in premature rupture of membranes with low bishop scores at term","volume":"77","author":"Ozden","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00700.x","article-title":"Misoprostol versus expectant management in premature rupture of membranes at term","volume":"112","author":"da Gra\u00e7a Krupa","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/S1028-4559(08)60079-0","article-title":"Pre-labor rupture of membranes at term in patients with an unfavorable cervix: active versus conservative management","volume":"47","author":"Ayaz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-011-0086-8","article-title":"Premature rupture of membranes at term: immediate induction with PGE(2) gel compared with delayed induction with oxytocin","volume":"61","author":"Poornima","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349109007914","article-title":"No benefit from conservative management in nulliparous women with premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) at term. A randomized study","volume":"70","author":"Rydhstr\u00f6m","year":"1991","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14466.x","article-title":"Role of prostaglandin in the management of prelabour rupture of the membranes at term","volume":"99","author":"Mahmood","year":"1992","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(95)02586-3","article-title":"Prelabour rupture of membranes at term: early induction of labour versus expectant management","volume":"70","author":"Alcalay","year":"1996","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13820.x","article-title":"Management of prelabour rupture of the membranes in term primigravidae: report of a randomized prospective trial","volume":"99","author":"Grant","year":"1992","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1996.24.3.237","article-title":"Controlled comparison of induction versus expectant care for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term","volume":"24","author":"Ottervanger","year":"1996","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70268-0","article-title":"Maternal colonization with group B Streptococcus and prelabor rupture of membranes at term: the role of induction of labor. TermPROM study group","volume":"177","author":"Hannah","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib87","first-page":"CD005302","article-title":"Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more)","volume":"1","author":"Middleton","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100425","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100425","article-title":"Induction within or after 12 hours of >\/= 36 weeks prelabor rupture of membranes: a systematic review and meta-analysis","author":"Bellussi","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03399.x","article-title":"Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term\u2013no advantage of delaying induction for 24 hours","volume":"39","author":"Akyol","year":"1999","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib90","first-page":"648","article-title":"Comparison of induction and expectant management of prelabour rupture of membranes at term for maternal outcome","volume":"8","author":"Maqbool","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pak J Med Health Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349609033283","article-title":"Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) at term in nulliparous women with a ripe cervix. A randomized trial of 12 or 24 hours of expectant management","volume":"75","author":"Hjertberg","year":"1996","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1447","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701645287","article-title":"Does acupuncture used in nulliparous women reduce time from prelabour rupture of membranes at term to active phase of labour? A randomised controlled trial","volume":"86","author":"Selmer-Olsen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib93","article-title":"Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section","volume":"6","author":"West","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1525","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2020.02.111","article-title":"Oral misoprostol for induction of labour in Term PROM: a systematic review","volume":"42","author":"Padayachee","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000172425.56840.57","article-title":"Misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis","volume":"106","author":"Lin","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050600589807","article-title":"A\u00a0prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term","volume":"19","author":"Zetero\u011flu","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2017.1329284","article-title":"Induction of labour in term premature rupture of membranes; oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol; a randomised clinical trial","volume":"38","author":"Pourali","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.04.031","article-title":"Misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 gel for labor induction in premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of pregnancy","volume":"130","author":"Zhang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181a1f605","article-title":"Concurrent dinoprostone and oxytocin for labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"113","author":"Tan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/S1028-4559(10)60010-1","article-title":"Randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus oxytocin for labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes","volume":"49","author":"Kunt","year":"2010","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.035","article-title":"Labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes: comparison between oxytocin and dinoprostone followed 6 hours later by oxytocin","volume":"206","author":"G\u00fcng\u00f6rd\u00fck","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1580608","article-title":"Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labor in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a randomized multicenter trial","volume":"33","author":"Kruit","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009_bib103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-026090","article-title":"Induction of labour in case of premature rupture of membranes at term with an unfavourable cervix: protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing double balloon catheter (+oxytocin) and vaginal prostaglandin (RUBAPRO) treatments","volume":"9","author":"Devillard","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Open"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693421001231?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693421001231?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T17:13:18Z","timestamp":1761498798000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693421001231"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"references-count":103,"alternative-id":["S1521693421001231"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Preterm and term prelabour rupture of membranes: A review of timing and methods of labour induction","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}