{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T12:13:05Z","timestamp":1788437585325,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1635724800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,21]],"date-time":"2021-09-21T00:07:09Z","timestamp":1632182829000},"page":"119-128","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"special_numbering":"C","title":["How and when to recommend delivery of a growth-restricted fetus: A review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"77","author":[{"given":"Andrea","family":"Lausman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Kingdom","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13522","article-title":"FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction","volume":"152","author":"Melamed","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.05.010","article-title":"Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (replaces clinical guideline number 3, April 2012)","volume":"223","author":"Martins","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e97","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003070","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin No. 204: fetal growth restriction","volume":"133","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20272","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth","volume":"53","author":"Salomon","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2S","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.004","article-title":"Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy","volume":"218","author":"McCowan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib6","series-title":"Fetal growth restriction, recognition, diagnosis management","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians","volume":"193","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib8","series-title":"Guideline for the management of suspected small for gestational age singleton pregnancies and infants after 34 wk\u2019 gestation","author":"New Zealand Maternal Fetal Medicine Network","year":"2014"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30865-3","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction: screening, diagnosis, and management","volume":"35","author":"Lausman","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib10","series-title":"The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2013"},{"issue":"2S","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S745","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.577","article-title":"Pathophysiology of placental-derived fetal growth restriction","volume":"218","author":"Burton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2019.10.008","article-title":"The placental basis of fetal growth restriction","volume":"47","author":"Zur","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13499","article-title":"Defining early vs late fetal growth restriction by placental pathology","volume":"98","author":"Aviram","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-9-32","article-title":"Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement","volume":"9","author":"Tveit","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1316","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000265804.09161.0d","article-title":"Circulating angiogenic factors in early pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, spontaneous preterm birth, and stillbirth","volume":"109","author":"Smith","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2057","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17047","article-title":"PlGF (placental growth factor) testing in clinical practice: evidence from a Canadian tertiary maternity referral center","volume":"77","author":"McLaughlin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1112","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002264","article-title":"Maternal vascular malperfusion and adverse perinatal outcomes in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"130","author":"Wright","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16361","article-title":"Implementation of routine first trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia: a clinical effectiveness study","volume":"128","author":"Guy","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2S","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S818","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.227","article-title":"Antenatal glucocorticoids, magnesium sulfate, and mode of birth in preterm fetal small for gestational age","volume":"218","author":"Ting","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9983","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62049-3","article-title":"TRUFFLE study group. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial","volume":"385","author":"Lees","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02014.x","article-title":"A\u00a0randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation","volume":"110","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"9433","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16809-8","article-title":"Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial","volume":"364","author":"Thornton","year":"2004","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13190","article-title":"Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE)","volume":"42","author":"Lees","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c7087","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"DIGITAT study group. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.015","article-title":"Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: a subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT","volume":"206","author":"Boers","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.07.017","article-title":"Economic analysis comparing induction of labour and expectant management for intrauterine growth restriction at term (DIGITAT trial)","volume":"170","author":"Vijgen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1427","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-011-9891-x","article-title":"Maternal health-related quality of life after induction of labor or expectant monitoring in pregnancy complicated by intrauterine growth retardation beyond 36 weeks","volume":"20","author":"Bijlenga","year":"2011","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.10.014","article-title":"Which intrauterine growth restricted fetuses at term benefit from early labour induction? A secondary analysis of the DIGITAT randomised trial","volume":"172","author":"Tajik","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2021.8608","article-title":"Association between iatrogenic delivery for suspected fetal growth restriction and childhood school outcomes","volume":"326","author":"Selvaratnam","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Med Assoc"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2021.8381","article-title":"Delivery before 39 Weeks' gestation for suspected fetal growth restriction: more harm than good?","volume":"326","author":"Silver","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Med Assoc"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib31","first-page":"544","article-title":"Delivery outcomes after term induction of labor in small-for-gestational age fetuses","volume":"34","author":"Rhoades","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"18","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2131","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.980807","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction: risk factors for unplanned primary cesarean delivery","volume":"28","author":"Horowitz","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1171839","article-title":"Doppler velocimetry and adverse outcome in labor induction for late IUGR","volume":"30","author":"Simeone","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820b0884","article-title":"Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"117","author":"Cruz-Mart\u00ednez","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.04.037","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial","volume":"221","author":"Haas","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4492-8","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term","volume":"296","author":"Duro-G\u00f3mez","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3841","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1474873","article-title":"Comparison of prostaglandin and mechanical cervical ripening in the setting of small for gestational age neonates","volume":"32","author":"Rossi","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.11.018","article-title":"Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction","volume":"129","author":"Chavakula","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.07.020","article-title":"Adverse intrapartum outcome in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age and late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with Dinoprostone, Misoprostol or mechanical methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"252","author":"Familiari","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4458-x","article-title":"What can we do to reduce the associated costs in induction of labour of intrauterine growth restriction foetuses at term? A cost-analysis study","volume":"296","author":"Duro-G\u00f3mez","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1563718","article-title":"Does induction with misoprostol impact the small for gestational age neonate?","volume":"32","author":"Foeller","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2004.00272.x","article-title":"Mode of delivery in pregnancies with suspected fetal growth restriction following induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2","volume":"83","author":"Ben-Haroush","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1159\/000491784","article-title":"Labor induction in late-onset fetal growth restriction: Foley balloon versus vaginal dinoprostone","volume":"46","author":"Villalain","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693421001292?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693421001292?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T17:13:01Z","timestamp":1761498781000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693421001292"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"references-count":43,"alternative-id":["S1521693421001292"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"How and when to recommend delivery of a growth-restricted fetus: A review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.006","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}