{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,14]],"date-time":"2026-01-14T18:31:14Z","timestamp":1768415474329,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":135,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,11]],"date-time":"2021-11-11T11:28:36Z","timestamp":1636630116000},"page":"55-69","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Labour induction in twin pregnancies"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"79","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2890-2781","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Uri","family":"Amikam","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4443-388X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Liran","family":"Hiersch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jon","family":"Barrett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nir","family":"Melamed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0025239","article-title":"Twinning across the developing world","volume":"6","author":"Smits","year":"2011","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.02.001","article-title":"Epidemiology of twinning in developed countries","volume":"36","author":"Ananth","year":"2012","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib3","article-title":"Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980-2009","volume":"1\u20138","author":"Martin","year":"2012","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.21106\/ijma.377","article-title":"Temporal trends in the rates of singletons, twins and higher-order multiple births over five decades across racial groups in the United States","volume":"9","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Matern Child Heal AIDS"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.04.005","article-title":"Risk of cesarean after induction of labor in twin compared to singleton pregnancies","volume":"237","author":"Loscul","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1804","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.804047","article-title":"Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies?","volume":"26","author":"Okby","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e145","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004397","article-title":"Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies: ACOG practice bulletin, number 231","volume":"137","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13227","article-title":"Trends in preterm birth in twin pregnancies in Victoria, Australia, 2007\u20132017","volume":"61","author":"Burger","year":"2021","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1356","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12281","article-title":"Preterm birth time trends in Europe: a study of 19 countries","volume":"120","author":"Zeitlin","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004506","article-title":"Outcomes associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in twin compared with singleton gestations","volume":"138","author":"Aviram","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.04.225","article-title":"Gestational diabetes and fetal growth in twin compared with singleton pregnancies","author":"Ashwal","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.04.022","article-title":"Association between hypertensive disorders and fetal growth restriction in twin compared with singleton gestations","volume":"221","author":"Proctor","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2546","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1555705","article-title":"Differences in fetal growth patterns between twins and singletons","volume":"33","author":"Hiersch","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1448","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.202837","article-title":"Maternal cardiovascular disease after twin pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a population-based cohort study","volume":"193","author":"Hiersch","year":"2021","journal-title":"CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/152.12.1107","article-title":"Mortality of twins and singletons by gestational age: a varying-coefficient approach","volume":"152","author":"Cheung","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib16","article-title":"Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"354","author":"Cheong-See","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.003","article-title":"Risk of late-preterm stillbirth and neonatal morbidity for monochorionic and dichorionic twins","volume":"210","author":"Burgess","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib18","first-page":"1","article-title":"Optimal timing of delivery based on the risk of stillbirth and infant death associated with each additional week of expectant management in multiple pregnancies: a national cohort study of koreans","volume":"33","author":"Ko","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Kor Med Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib19","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Green-top guideline No. 51","volume":"124","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib20","series-title":"Twin and triplet pregnancy","first-page":"1","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12742","article-title":"Good clinical practice advice: management of twin pregnancy","volume":"144","author":"Di Renzo","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib22","article-title":"Management of monochorionic twin pregnancy","year":"2017","journal-title":"R\u00a0Aust New Zeal Coll Obstet Gynaecol Manag Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1093\/eurpub\/ckw060","article-title":"Variation in induction of labour rates across Irish hospitals; A cross-sectional study","volume":"26","author":"Sinnott","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Publ Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2009.01086.x","article-title":"Trends in induction of labour, 1998-2007: a population-based study","volume":"49","author":"Mealing","year":"2009","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib25","first-page":"1","volume":"vol. 70","author":"Martin","year":"2021"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292","article-title":"Temporal changes in rates and reasons for medical induction of term labor, 1980-1996","volume":"184","author":"Yawn","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00213-5","article-title":"Oxytocin labor stimulation of twin gestations: effective and efficient","volume":"90","author":"Fausett","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1159\/000010114","article-title":"Case series of labor induction in twin gestations with an intrauterine balloon catheter","volume":"47","author":"Manor","year":"1999","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1043","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.942629","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone-is it effective and safe?","volume":"28","author":"Huber","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31825f3643","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin compared with singleton pregnancies","volume":"120","author":"Taylor","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03369-x","article-title":"Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study","volume":"20","author":"Dougan","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1324","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1693695","article-title":"Induction of labor versus cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies","volume":"37","author":"Zafman","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib33","first-page":"1","article-title":"Maternal morbidity of induction of labor compared to planned cesarean delivery in twin gestations","author":"Grossman","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1159\/000010207","article-title":"Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy","volume":"49","author":"Suzuki","year":"2000","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-1201-8","article-title":"The effect of induction method in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis for the twin birth study","volume":"17","author":"Mei-Dan","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib36","article-title":"Elective birth at 37 weeks' gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy","volume":"2014","author":"Dodd","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3999","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1152252","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin gestation: lessons from a population based study","volume":"29","author":"Hamou","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2016.1205554","article-title":"Induction of labour vs. spontaneous vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy after 36 weeks of gestation","volume":"37","author":"Tavares","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0566-4","article-title":"Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study","volume":"15","author":"Jonsson","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2006.020","article-title":"Induction of labor with oral misoprostol in nulliparous mothers of twins","volume":"34","author":"Sim\u00f5es","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500463582","article-title":"Is misoprostol safe for labor induction in twin gestations?","volume":"19","author":"Bush","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00006-1","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin pregnancy after 36 weeks does not increase maternal-fetal morbidity","volume":"77","author":"Harle","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib43","first-page":"804","article-title":"Mode of delivery in multiple pregnancies","volume":"71","author":"Aviram","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obs Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.132","article-title":"Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight","volume":"192","author":"Yang","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01356.x","article-title":"Twin births: cesarean section or vaginal delivery?","volume":"91","author":"Hoffmann","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00631.x","article-title":"Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births","volume":"112","author":"Smith","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318163c435","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy","volume":"111","author":"Schmitz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.02.007","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal outcomes in twin gestations \u226532 weeks according to the planned mode of delivery","volume":"123","author":"Haest","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1193","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-010-1525-y","article-title":"Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population","volume":"283","author":"Bodner","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02836.x","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"118","author":"Rossi","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1214939","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy","volume":"369","author":"Barrett","year":"2013","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.002","article-title":"Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in extremely preterm Vertex\/nonVertex twins","volume":"224","author":"Hiersch","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1295441","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes of preterm twins according to mode of birth and presentation","volume":"31","author":"Hunter","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2020.04.004","article-title":"Induction of labor in continuing pregnancies","volume":"67","author":"Levine","year":"2020","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0065612","article-title":"Patterns and outcomes of induction of labour in Africa and Asia: a secondary analysis of the WHO global survey on maternal and neonatal health","volume":"8","author":"Vogel","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"904","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2014.4779","article-title":"Trends in elective labor induction for six United States Health Plans, 2001-2007","volume":"23","author":"Dublin","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Wom Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000021","article-title":"Epidemiologic considerations: scope of problem and disparity concerns","volume":"57","author":"Getahun","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00147-9","article-title":"Trends in twin births in new south wales, Australia, 1990-1999","volume":"78","author":"Roberts","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib59","first-page":"1313","article-title":"Trends in twin neonatal mortality rates in the United States, 1989 through 1999: influence of birth registration and obstetric intervention","volume":"190","author":"Ananth","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1375\/twin.4.3.137","article-title":"Induction of labour and scheduled cesarean deliveries in twin pregnancies at the Port-Royal Maternity Hospital in Paris France","volume":"4","author":"Papiernik","year":"2001","journal-title":"Twin Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib61","first-page":"57","article-title":"Causes and consequences of recent increases in preterm birth among twins","volume":"98","author":"Joseph","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199209000-00006","article-title":"Oxytocin for the induction or augmentation of labor","volume":"35","author":"Owen","year":"1992","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-198006000-00002","article-title":"Oxytocin in maternal circulation and amniotic fluid during pregnancy","volume":"35","author":"Dawood","year":"1980","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/S0146-0005(95)80044-1","article-title":"Plasma membrane receptors regulating myometrial contractility and their hormonal modulation","volume":"19","author":"Fuchs","year":"1995","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90677-X","article-title":"Oxytocin receptors in the human uterus during pregnancy and parturition","volume":"150","author":"Fuchs","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1038\/356526a0","article-title":"Structure and expression of a human oxytocin receptor","volume":"356","author":"Kimura","year":"1992","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1093\/molehr\/gah021","article-title":"Mechanical stretch activates type 2 cyclooxygenase via activator protein-1 transcription factor in human myometrial cells","volume":"10","author":"Sooranna","year":"2004","journal-title":"Mol Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1210\/jc.2004-0277","article-title":"Mechanical stretch up-regulates the human oxytocin receptor in primary human uterine myocytes","volume":"90","author":"Terzidou","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Endocrinol Metab"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"895","DOI":"10.1093\/molehr\/gah112","article-title":"Mechanical stretch of human uterine smooth muscle cells increases IL-8 mRNA expression and peptide synthesis","volume":"10","author":"Loudon","year":"2004","journal-title":"Mol Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1038\/cmi.2014.39","article-title":"Stretch-induced human myometrial cytokines enhance immune cell recruitment via endothelial activation","volume":"12","author":"Lee","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cell Mol Immunol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.02.011","article-title":"A\u00a0short review of twin pregnancy and how oxytocin receptor expression may differ in multiple pregnancy","volume":"144","author":"Turton","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1177\/1933719115597788","article-title":"Differing in\u00a0vitro potencies of tocolytics and progesterone in myometrium from singleton and twin pregnancies","volume":"23","author":"Sarah","year":"2016","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"789.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.08.015","article-title":"The combination tocolytic effect of magnesium sulfate and an oxytocin receptor antagonist in myometrium from singleton and twin pregnancies","volume":"215","author":"Arrowsmith","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0063800","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of the contractile properties of myometrium from singleton and twin pregnancies","volume":"8","author":"Turton","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2017.1361388","article-title":"Induction of labour: clinical predictive factors for success and failure","volume":"38","author":"Batinelli","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00017","article-title":"Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis","volume":"49","author":"Crane","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","article-title":"Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas","volume":"105","author":"Vahratian","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-61720-w","article-title":"Severe maternal morbidity by mode of delivery in women with twin pregnancy and planned vaginal delivery","volume":"10","author":"Korb","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2178-1","article-title":"Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor","volume":"285","author":"G\u00f3mez-Laencina","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13411","article-title":"Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography","volume":"44","author":"Pereira","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105399","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction","volume":"182","author":"Ware","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1410","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.01.033","article-title":"Comparative longitudinal study of cervical length and induced shortening changes among singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies","volume":"192","author":"Meath","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2010.01203.x","article-title":"Longitudinal changes in canal length at 16-35 weeks in normal twin pregnancies and twin pregnancies with preterm labor and delivery","volume":"36","author":"Yoshizato","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1125","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13038","article-title":"Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters","volume":"42","author":"Han","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2014.05.011","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin pregnancies compared to singleton pregnancies; Risk factors for failure","volume":"44","author":"Ghassani","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Gynecol Obstet Biol La Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701778773","article-title":"Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 at preterm","volume":"87","author":"Melamed","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.07.035","article-title":"Preterm induction of labor: predictors of vaginal delivery and labor curves","volume":"212","author":"Feghali","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.2017.60.2.163","article-title":"Predicting factors for success of vaginal delivery in preterm induction with prostaglandin E2","volume":"60","author":"Kim","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000215988.23224.e4","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term","volume":"108","author":"Allen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2017-0231","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin gestation: can we predict success?","volume":"46","author":"Razavi","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2009.099","article-title":"Body mass index, Bishop score, and sonographic measurement of the cervical length as predictors of successful labor induction in twin gestations","volume":"37","author":"Park","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib92","article-title":"Labor induction in twin pregnancies: does the perinatal outcome differ according to chorionicity? [published online ahead of print, 2021 Oct 2]","author":"Krispin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib93","article-title":"Risk factors for cesarean delivery following labor induction in multiparous women","volume":"2013","author":"Verhoeven","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Pregnancy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013","article-title":"Failed induction of labor","volume":"39","author":"Schoen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181ad9377","article-title":"Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts","volume":"114","author":"Pevzner","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3009","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1271410","article-title":"Effect of fetal gender on induction of labor failure rates","volume":"30","author":"Ashwal","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12588","article-title":"Predictors of mode of birth and duration of labour following induction using prostaglandin vaginal gel","volume":"57","author":"Beckmann","year":"2017","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4260-1","article-title":"Can we predict successful cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 vaginal inserts?","volume":"295","author":"Hiersch","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1733","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.799661","article-title":"Association and risk factors between induction of labor and cesarean section","volume":"26","author":"Yogev","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00881.x","article-title":"Variables that predict the success of labor induction","volume":"84","author":"Bueno","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1100","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13589","article-title":"Prediction models for determining the success of labor induction : a systematic review","author":"Meier","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.722729","article-title":"Labor induction with prostaglandin E2: characteristics of response and prediction of failure","volume":"26","author":"Melamed","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1298","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1563717","article-title":"Maternal obesity class as a predictor of induction failure: a practical risk assessment tool","volume":"32","author":"Ronzoni","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2232-8","article-title":"Derivation and validation of a model predicting the likelihood of vaginal birth following labour induction","volume":"19","author":"Alavifard","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903197076","article-title":"Failure of cervical ripening with prostaglandin-E2 can it be predicted?","volume":"23","author":"Melamed","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2146","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1240165","article-title":"Induction of labor in elderly nulliparous women","volume":"30","author":"Hadar","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1195","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4171-1","article-title":"Induction of labor: does indication matter?","volume":"294","author":"Gabbay-Benziv","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.017","article-title":"Fetal presentation and successful twin vaginal delivery","volume":"214","author":"Easter","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib109","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1016423","article-title":"Planned delivery at 37 weeks in twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"29","author":"Saccone","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03356.x","article-title":"Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial","volume":"119","author":"Dodd","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(67)90300-6","article-title":"Oxytocin in twin gestation","volume":"99","author":"Neimand","year":"1967","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib112","first-page":"303","article-title":"Oxytocin treatment in twin pregnancy labour","volume":"28","author":"Leroy","year":"1979","journal-title":"Acta Genet Med Gemellol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.011","article-title":"Labor induction techniques: which is the best?","volume":"44","author":"Penfield","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000608","article-title":"Induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"32","author":"Solone","year":"2020","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"614.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.03.034","article-title":"Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"218","author":"Pimentel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib116","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2017.1292224","article-title":"Risk of caesarean delivery after induction of labour stratified by foetal sex","volume":"37","author":"Hadar","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib117","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0033-1352486","article-title":"Effect of prostaglandin E2 on myometrial electrical activity in women undergoing induction of labor","volume":"31","author":"Aviram","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib118","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1874","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.883375","article-title":"Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"27","author":"Ashwal","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1080\/14740338.2018.1404573","article-title":"A\u00a0safety review of medications used for labour induction","volume":"17","author":"Sheibani","year":"2018","journal-title":"Expet Opin Drug Saf"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.11.001","article-title":"Comparing foley catheter to prostaglandins for cervical ripening in multiparous women","volume":"42","author":"Manly","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.012","article-title":"Augmentation of labor: a review of oxytocin augmentation and active management of labor","volume":"44","author":"Kernberg","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib122","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"480.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.026","article-title":"Implementation of a conservative checklist-based protocol for oxytocin administration: maternal and newborn outcomes","volume":"197","author":"Clark","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib123","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"622.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.01.039","article-title":"Improving patient safety and uniformity of care by a standardized regimen for the use of oxytocin","volume":"198","author":"Hayes","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.10.3.171.174","article-title":"Vaginal birth of twins after a previous Cesarean section","volume":"10","author":"Myles","year":"2001","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.03.023","article-title":"The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit cesarean registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation","volume":"193","author":"Varner","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/6693142","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture with vaginal birth after cesarean in twin gestations","volume":"2021","author":"Baradaran","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib127","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000280586.05350.9e","article-title":"Trial of labor after one previous cesarean delivery for multifetal gestation","volume":"110","author":"Varner","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib128","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06062-2","article-title":"Twin TOLAC is an independent risk factor for adverse maternal and neonatal outcome","author":"Lopian","year":"2021","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1487942","article-title":"Labor induction in indicated moderate to late preterm birth","volume":"33","author":"Bertholdt","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib131","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.05.025","article-title":"Predictors of vaginal delivery in medically indicated early preterm induction of labor","volume":"217","author":"Sievert","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib132","series-title":"Geneva world heal organ","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib133","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30842-2","article-title":"Induction of labour","volume":"35","author":"Leduc","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib134","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor","volume":"114","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001_bib135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.12.045","article-title":"Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French college of gynaecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"156","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693421001462?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693421001462?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T17:13:15Z","timestamp":1761498795000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693421001462"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"references-count":135,"alternative-id":["S1521693421001462"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Labour induction in twin pregnancies","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.10.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}