{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,5]],"date-time":"2026-11-05T15:53:00Z","timestamp":1793893980653,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":63,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004914","name":"Ferring Pharmaceuticals","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004914","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,15]],"date-time":"2022-01-15T11:31:12Z","timestamp":1642246272000},"page":"107-125","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Induction of labour in low-risk pregnancies before 40 weeks of gestation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"79","author":[{"given":"Susan","family":"Dong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shakira","family":"Bapoo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Minakshi","family":"Shukla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nimrah","family":"Abbasi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daphne","family":"Horn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rohan","family":"D'Souza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e35","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004447","article-title":"Medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries: ACOG committee opinion, number 831","volume":"138","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.002","article-title":"Optimal timing of labour induction in contemporary clinical practice","volume":"79","author":"Papalia","year":"2022","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.007","article-title":"Evidence around early induction of labor in women of advanced maternal age and those using assisted reproductive technology","volume":"77","author":"Venkatanarayanan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.004","article-title":"Labour induction in individuals with obesity","volume":"79","author":"Ashraf","year":"2022","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.003","article-title":"Induction of labour in patients with prior caesarean births or uterine surgery","volume":"79","author":"Agarwal","year":"2022","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib6","series-title":"Recommendations: induction of labour at or beyond term","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib7","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"5","author":"Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30290-5","article-title":"Induction of labour: review","volume":"37","author":"Leduc","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can\u202f: JOGC = J Obstet Gynecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib9","series-title":"Induction of labour: clinical guideline","first-page":"2008","year":"2008"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.04.020","article-title":"214-Guidelines for the management of pregnancy at 41+0 to 42+0 weeks","volume":"39","author":"Delaney","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can : JOGC = J Obstet Gynecol Can"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.046","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies","volume":"221","author":"Grobman","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20140","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis","volume":"53","author":"Sotiriadis","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.009","article-title":"Electronic address pso. SMFM statement on elective induction of labor in low-risk nulliparous women at term: the ARRIVE trial","volume":"221","author":"Society of Maternal-Fetal Publications Committee","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib15","series-title":"Clinical guidance for integration of the findings of the ARRIVE trial: labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.05.037","article-title":"Elective induction of labour in low risk nulliparous women at term: caution is needed","volume":"239","author":"Ghi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2018.08.168","article-title":"Why ARRIVE should not thrive in Australia","volume":"31","author":"Davies-Tuck","year":"2018","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.12996","article-title":"The ARRIVE trial: interpretation from an epidemiologic perspective","volume":"64","author":"Carmichael","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Midwifery Wom Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib19","article-title":"Induction of labour in low-risk pregnancies at term but before 40 weeks of gestation in the absence of medical or obstetric indications: a systematic review and meta-analysis","author":"D'Souza","year":"2017","journal-title":"Prospero: Int Prospect Reg Syst Rev"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.11.008","article-title":"Cervical ripening and labour induction: a critical review of the available methods","volume":"79","author":"Shahabuddin","year":"2022","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-8-11","article-title":"The fetuses-at-risk approach: clarification of semantic and conceptual misapprehension","volume":"8","author":"Joseph","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"7414","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib24","first-page":"15","article-title":"Closing the gap between methodologists and end-users: R as a computational back-end","volume":"49","author":"Wallace","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Stat Software"},{"issue":"7454","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7454.1490","article-title":"Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations","volume":"328","author":"Atkins","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1258","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001154","article-title":"Elective induction of labor compared with expectant management of nulliparous women at 39 Weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"126","author":"Miller","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500139604","article-title":"Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"18","author":"Nielsen","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med : Off J Eur Assoc Perinat Med, Feder Asia Ocean Perinat Soc, Int Soc Perinat Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00004-5","article-title":"The effectiveness of sweeping membranes at term: a randomized trial","volume":"89","author":"Crane","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90247-3","article-title":"The use of breast stimulation to prevent postdate pregnancy","volume":"149","author":"Elliott","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1509117","article-title":"Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35 Years of age or older","volume":"374","author":"Walker","year":"2016","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.3109\/00016347909154610","article-title":"Spontaneous labor and elective induction--a prospective randomized study. I. Effects on mother and fetus","volume":"58","author":"Tylleskar","year":"1979","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib32","first-page":"5","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized controlled trial of selective planned delivery","volume":"85","author":"Martin","year":"1978","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"7910","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(75)92435-6","article-title":"Elective induction of labour. A randomised prospective trial","volume":"1","author":"Cole","year":"1975","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4173-z","article-title":"Randomized double-blind placebo controlled study of preinduction cervical priming with 25 microg of misoprostol in the outpatient setting to prevent formal induction of labour","volume":"295","author":"PonMalar","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(97)00249-X","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of stripping of membranes at term","volume":"60","author":"Gupta","year":"1998","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet: Off Organ Int Feder Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13377","article-title":"Induction of labour from 39 weeks in low-risk multiparas with ripe cervixes: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"61","author":"Tan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1159\/000091842","article-title":"Effect of membrane sweeping at term pregnancy on duration of pregnancy and labor induction: a randomized trial","volume":"62","author":"Kashanian","year":"2006","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.1999.tb01119.x","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation: a prospective randomized trial","volume":"25","author":"Amano","year":"1999","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib39","first-page":"4","article-title":"Stripping of the membranes to induce labor at term","volume":"42","author":"Alcoseba-Lin","year":"1992","journal-title":"Philipp J Surg Special"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00015-4","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized controlled trial of membrane stripping at term to promote labor","volume":"87","author":"Wiriyasirivaj","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"958","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13561","article-title":"Induction of labor at full-term in pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"98","author":"Saccone","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib42","first-page":"S1","article-title":"Induction of labor for low-risk women: is 39 the New 41?","author":"D'Souza","year":"2017","journal-title":"Mod Day Labour"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003372","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes among low-risk parous women at 39-41 Weeks of gestation","volume":"134","author":"Chen","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.006","article-title":"Towards an evidence-based approach to optimize the success of labour induction","volume":"77","author":"Banner","year":"2021","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003371","article-title":"Elective induction of labor in the 39th week of gestation compared with expectant management of low-risk multiparous women","volume":"134","author":"Sinkey","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.223","article-title":"Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term","volume":"220","author":"Souter","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14528","article-title":"Participation in clinical trials improves outcomes in women's health: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"124","author":"Nijjar","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.032","article-title":"The impact of induction of labor at 39 weeks in low-risk women on the incidence of stillbirth","volume":"222","author":"Po","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13139","article-title":"Response to 'Induction of labour at 39 weeks should be routinely offered to low-risk women","volume":"60","author":"Nippita","year":"2020","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib50","series-title":"High-alert medications in acute care settings","year":"2018"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.017","article-title":"Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"220","author":"Hersh","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003930","article-title":"Cost of elective labor induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women","volume":"136","author":"Einerson","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13049","article-title":"Offering routine induction of labour at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparous women: No need for hasty change","volume":"59","author":"Nippita","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0194906","article-title":"What matters to women during childbirth: a systematic qualitative review","volume":"13","author":"Downe","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.008","article-title":"Attitudes of pregnant women and healthcare professionals to labour induction and obtaining consent for labour induction","volume":"77","author":"Coates","year":"2021","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2018.10.013","article-title":"Women's experiences of induction of labour: qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis","volume":"69","author":"Coates","year":"2019","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13245","article-title":"A\u00a0survey of obstetricians' attitudes to induction of labour at 39 weeks gestation with the intention of reducing caesarean section rates","volume":"61","author":"Davis","year":"2021","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.12688\/wellcomeopenres.12783.1","article-title":"Long term cognitive outcomes of early term (37-38 weeks) and late preterm (34-36 weeks) births: a systematic review","volume":"2","author":"Murray","year":"2017","journal-title":"Wellcome Open Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.01.012","article-title":"Avoiding myopia in assessing elective 39-week inductions","volume":"224","author":"Metcalf","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000289","article-title":"Gestational age at delivery and special educational need: retrospective cohort study of 407,503 schoolchildren","volume":"7","author":"MacKay","year":"2010","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib61","first-page":"dyab134","article-title":"Gestational age at term delivery and children\u2019s neurocognitive development","author":"Gleason","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12980","article-title":"Induction of labour at 39 weeks should be routinely offered to low-risk women","volume":"59","author":"de Vries","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.034","article-title":"The ARRIVE Trial: towards a universal recommendation of induction of labour at 39 weeks?","volume":"244","author":"Migliorelli","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693421001863?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693421001863?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T17:13:38Z","timestamp":1761498818000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693421001863"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"references-count":63,"alternative-id":["S1521693421001863"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Induction of labour in low-risk pregnancies before 40 weeks of gestation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.007","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}