{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T23:07:40Z","timestamp":1787872060651,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":70,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,20]],"date-time":"2022-08-20T19:31:08Z","timestamp":1661023868000},"page":"43-54","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Routine Doppler ultrasound in twin pregnancy"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"84","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Mulcahy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F.M.","family":"McAuliffe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1900","article-title":"Increased latency of absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery of monochorionic twin fetuses","volume":"26","author":"Vanderheyden","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0123067","article-title":"Prognostic value of umbilical and cerebral Doppler in fetal growth restriction: comparison of dichorionic twins and singletons","volume":"10","author":"Vanlieferinghen","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib3","series-title":"Doppler ultrasound in obstetrics and Gynecology","first-page":"161","article-title":"Doppler ultrasonographic investigate on of fetal circulation","author":"Arbeille","year":"1997"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib4","first-page":"1404","article-title":"Selective fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies: diagnosis, natural history, and perinatal outcome","volume":"9","author":"Antonakopoulos","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e 0226090","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0226090","article-title":"Longitudinal Doppler references for monchorionic twins and comparison with singletons","volume":"14","author":"Casati","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13302","article-title":"Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler reference ranges in a twin population followed longitudinally from 24 to 38 weeks gestation","volume":"44","author":"Mulcahy","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1052","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2006.01.001","article-title":"Ted (G.J) Kloosterman:on intrauterine growth. The significance of prenatal care. Studies on birth weight, placental weight and placental index","volume":"27","author":"Bleker","year":"2006","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.044","article-title":"Dichorionic twin trajectories: the NICHD fetal growth studies","volume":"215","author":"Grantz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01361.x","article-title":"The creation of twin centile curves for size","volume":"109","author":"Ong","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14640","article-title":"On behalf of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort","volume":"45","author":"Stirrup","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib11","first-page":"643","article-title":"Neonatal adverse outcome in twin pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age: twin vs singleton reference chart","volume":"10","author":"Briffa","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib12","first-page":"643","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes of small for gestational age in twin pregnancies: twin vs. Singleton charts","volume":"10","author":"Giorgione","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1017\/S0965539501000225","article-title":"Doppler ultrasound in twin pregnancy","volume":"12","author":"Giles","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fetal Matern Med Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib14","article-title":"Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies","volume":"6","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02066.x","article-title":"Damp study group. The Doppler assessment in multiple pregnancy randomised controlled trial of ultrasound biometry versus umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound and biometry in twin pregnancy","volume":"110","author":"Giles","year":"2003","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib16","series-title":"Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth group","first-page":"11","author":"Woolcock","year":"2017"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1028","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2017-0253","article-title":"Selective IUGR in dichorionic twins: what can Doppler assessment and growth discordancy say about neonatal outcomes?","volume":"46","author":"Algeri","year":"2018","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15821","article-title":"ISUOG practice guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy","volume":"47","author":"Khalil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19013","article-title":"Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure","volume":"53","author":"Khalil","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.049","article-title":"Dichorionic twin ultrasound surveillance: sonography every 4 weeks significantly underperforms sonography every 2 weeks: results of the prospective multicentre ESPRiT study","volume":"213","author":"Corcoran","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823d7b06","article-title":"Optimum timing for planned delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies","volume":"119","author":"Breathnach","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2338","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14799","article-title":"Prevalence of umbilical artery Doppler waveform abnormality during the early second trimester and the subsequent variation of waveforms in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a prospective cohort study","volume":"47","author":"Nakanishi","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4046","article-title":"A\u00a0classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin","volume":"30","author":"Gratac\u00f3s","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1013","article-title":"Incidence and characteristics of umbilical artery intermittent absent and\/or reversed end-diastolic flow in complicated and uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies","volume":"23","author":"Gratacos","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.573830","article-title":"Outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancies with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler between 16 and 20 weeks of gestation","author":"Pan","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.34.4.569","article-title":"Do Doppler studies enhance surveillance of uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins","volume":"34","author":"Pessel","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"662","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5363","article-title":"The value of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in the antenatal surveillance of uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies","volume":"31","author":"Hack","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0255897","article-title":"The accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction with second trimester Doppler ultrasound in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies","volume":"16","author":"Wang","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib29","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Green-top guideline No. 51","volume":"124","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib30","series-title":"Management of monochorionic twin pregnancy","author":"The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstericians and Gynaecologists","year":"2021"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib31","series-title":"Twin and triplet pregnancy","year":"2019"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12742","article-title":"Good clinical practice advice: management of twin pregnancy","volume":"144","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e398","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.08.014","article-title":"No. 260-Ultrasound in twin pregnancies","volume":"39","author":"Morin","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e145","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004397","article-title":"Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies: ACOG practice bulletin, number 231","volume":"137","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821fd208","article-title":"Definition of intertwin birthweight discordance","volume":"118","author":"Breathnach","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000122","article-title":"Fetal surveillance and timing of delivery for multiples","volume":"58","author":"Ulnal","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12412","article-title":"Southwest Thames obstetric research colloborative (STORK). Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twins; analysis of the Southwest Thames obstetric research colloborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort","volume":"41","author":"D'Antonia","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13092","article-title":"Prenatal prediction of significant intertwin birthweight discordance using standard second and third trimester sonographic parameters","volume":"96","author":"Hehir","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1992.11.10.537","article-title":"Doppler flow velocity waveforms in fetal surveillance of twins: a prospective longitudinal study","volume":"11","author":"Degani","year":"1992","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(92)90187-4","article-title":"Doppler velocimetry in twin pregnancy","volume":"45","author":"Jensen","year":"1992","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.08.066","article-title":"Society for maternal-fetal medicine special statement: updated checklists for management of monochorionic twin pregnancy","volume":"223","author":"Hoskins","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1348","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0041-1732456","article-title":"Predicting adverse outcomes in monochorionic-diamniotic twins: the role of intertwin discrepancy in middle cerebral artery Doppler measurements and the cerebroplacental ratio","volume":"38","author":"Mok","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.10.6.371.375","article-title":"The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio and neonatal outcome in diamniotic monochorionic and dichorionic twins","volume":"10","author":"Gaziano","year":"2001","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14944","article-title":"Intertwin discrepancy in middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity and third trimester fetal growth restriction in monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancy","volume":"48","author":"Stagnati","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"222.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.024","article-title":"Discordance in fetal biometry and Doppler are independent predictors of the risk of perinatal loss in twin pregnancies","volume":"213","author":"Khalil","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3127","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14866","article-title":"Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications for monochorionic diamniotic and dichorionic diamniotic twins after 24 weeks of gestation","volume":"47","author":"Yu","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1159\/000448094","article-title":"Optimal interval between ultrasound scansfor the detection of complications in monchorionic twins","volume":"41","author":"Mc Donald","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1482","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.6067","article-title":"Outstanding clinical and research questions in complex twin and multiple pregnancy","volume":"41","author":"Townsend","year":"2021","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib49","first-page":"1128","article-title":"Review of international clinical guidelines related to prenatal screening during monochorionic pregnancies","volume":"10","author":"Nicholas","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2006.01.010","article-title":"Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence in two monochorionic twin pairs without oligo-polyhydramnios sequence","volume":"28","author":"Lopriore","year":"2007","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib51","first-page":"1735","article-title":"Middle cerebral artery Doppler velocimetry for the diagnosis of twin anemia polycythemia sequence; a systematic review","volume":"9","author":"Brock","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.041","article-title":"Spontaneous twin anaemia-polycythemia sequence: diagnosis, management and outcome in an international cohort of 249 cases","volume":"224","author":"Tollenaar","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.22734","article-title":"Prediction of pregnancy complications by second trimester uterine artery Doppler assessment in monochorionic twins","volume":"47","author":"Masini","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib54","first-page":"978","article-title":"Uterine artery Doppler velocity waveforms in twin pregnancies","volume":"82","author":"Rizzo","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1159\/000009948","article-title":"Comparative changes in uterine artery blood flow waveforms in singletons and twin pregnancies","volume":"45","author":"Chen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2421","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.15627","article-title":"Uterine artery Doppler reference ranges in a twin population followed longitudinally from 17 to 37 weeks' gestation compared to that of singletons","volume":"40","author":"Filipecka-Tyczka","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8859","article-title":"Reference ranges for Doppler assessment of uterine artery resistance and pulsatility indices in dichorionic twin pregnancies","volume":"37","author":"Geipel","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00866.x","article-title":"Doppler assessment of the uterine circulation in the second trimester in twin pregnancies: prediction of pre-eclampsia, small for gestational age and birth weight discordance","volume":"20","author":"Geipel","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20105","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia","volume":"53","author":"Sotiriadis","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib60","first-page":"2653","article-title":"Notching and pulsatility index of the uterine arteries and preeclampsia in twin pregnancies","volume":"9","author":"Springer","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Clin Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00865.x","article-title":"Screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancies at 23 weeks of gestation by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler","volume":"20","author":"Yu","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17531","article-title":"Competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancy according to maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation","volume":"50","author":"Francisco","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23531","article-title":"Prediction of pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancy by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13weeks gestation; data from EVENTS trial","volume":"57","author":"Benko","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"786","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-04217-2","article-title":"Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies: an observational cohort study based on propensity score matching","volume":"21","author":"Ye","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2016.55","article-title":"Low-dose aspirin for pre-eclampsia prevention in twins with elevated human chorionic gonadotropin","volume":"36","author":"Euser","year":"2016","journal-title":"J\u00a0Perinatol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.03.005","article-title":"The role of aspirin in prevention of preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: does the dose matter?","volume":"223","author":"Kalafat","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2002.810817.x","article-title":"Doppler velocimetry for predicting fetal death in a twin pregnancy","volume":"81","author":"Soikkeli","year":"2002","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12893","article-title":"Ductus venosus Doppler in the assessment of fetal cardiovascular health: an updated practical approach","volume":"95","author":"Seravalli","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"744","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15916","article-title":"Changes in ductus venosus flow profile in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: role in risk stratification","volume":"48","author":"Wohlmuth","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2S","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S783","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.226","article-title":"Outcome in early-onset fetal growth restriction is best combining computerized fetal heart rate analysis with ductus venosus Doppler: insights from the Trial of Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe","volume":"218","author":"Frusca","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693422001092?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693422001092?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T17:15:19Z","timestamp":1761498919000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693422001092"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"references-count":70,"alternative-id":["S1521693422001092"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Routine Doppler ultrasound in twin pregnancy","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.08.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}