{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T13:54:51Z","timestamp":1787061291180,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,28]],"date-time":"2022-12-28T20:22:28Z","timestamp":1672258948000},"page":"102303","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Freeze-all embryos during treatment with assisted reproduction: Health economic aspects"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"86","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9591-7222","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christos","family":"Venetis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elena","family":"Keller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Georgina M.","family":"Chambers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.001","article-title":"Towards the global coverage of a unified registry of IVF outcomes","volume":"38","author":"Fauser","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1126\/science.7221557","article-title":"Pregnancies in humans by fertilization in\u00a0vitro and embryo transfer in the controlled ovulatory cycle","volume":"212","author":"Trounson","year":"1981","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01129622","article-title":"Human in\u00a0vitro fertilization employing individualized ovulation induction by human menopausal gonadotropins","volume":"1","author":"Laufer","year":"1984","journal-title":"J\u00a0In\u00a0Vitro Fert Embryo Transf"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.10.008","article-title":"Is there an optimal number of oocytes retrieved at which live birth rates or cumulative live birth rates per aspiration are maximized after ART? A systematic review","volume":"42","author":"Law","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1778","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez100","article-title":"The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles","volume":"34","author":"Law","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1768","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der106","article-title":"Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles","volume":"26","author":"Sunkara","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.11.010","article-title":"Female age is associated with the optimal number of oocytes to maximize fresh live birth rates: an analysis of 256,643 fresh ART cycles","volume":"42","author":"Zhang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey342","article-title":"Is more better? A higher oocyte yield is independently associated with more day-3 euploid embryos after ICSI","volume":"34","author":"Venetis","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1038\/305707a0","article-title":"Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo","volume":"305","author":"Trounson","year":"1983","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e3283297dd6","article-title":"Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better?","volume":"21","author":"Kolibianakis","year":"2009","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.06.010","article-title":"Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"90","author":"Loutradi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib12","first-page":"139","article-title":"Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance","volume":"23","author":"Rienzi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1348","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem006","article-title":"Elective cryopreservation of all pronuclear oocytes after GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in patients at risk of developing OHSS: a prospective, observational proof-of-concept study","volume":"22","author":"Griesinger","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.05.026","article-title":"Intravenous albumin administration for the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"95","author":"Venetis","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050","article-title":"Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in\u00a0vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders","volume":"96","author":"Shapiro","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.02.059","article-title":"Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in\u00a0vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders","volume":"96","author":"Shapiro","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2092","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq125","article-title":"Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in\u00a0vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles","volume":"25","author":"Bosch","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.2174\/138920112799361927","article-title":"Significantly lower pregnancy rates in the presence of progesterone elevation in patients treated with GnRH antagonists and gonadotrophins: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"13","author":"Kolibianakis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Curr Pharmaceut Biotechnol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu362","article-title":"Estimating the net effect of progesterone elevation on the day of hCG on live birth rates after IVF: a cohort analysis of 3296 IVF cycles","volume":"30","author":"Venetis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmt014","article-title":"Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles","volume":"19","author":"Venetis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1379","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deac126","article-title":"Pro: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer. Is frozen embryo transfer the future?","volume":"37","author":"Venetis","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib22","series-title":"Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2019","first-page":"1","author":"Newman","year":"2021"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deac105.057","article-title":"O-151 ICMART preliminary world report 2018","volume":"37","author":"Adamson","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey388","article-title":"Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis","volume":"34","author":"Bosdou","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmx031","article-title":"Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?","volume":"24","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in\u00a0vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"98","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2048","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev168","article-title":"Risk of ectopic pregnancy lowest with transfer of single frozen blastocyst","volume":"30","author":"Li","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2021.10.008","article-title":"Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) 2022 explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR CHEERS II good practices task force","volume":"25","author":"Husereau","year":"2022","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.5935\/1518-0557.20150028","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of the freeze-all policy","volume":"19","author":"Roque","year":"2015","journal-title":"JBRA Assist Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2016.09.008","article-title":"A\u00a0direct healthcare cost analysis of the cryopreserved versus fresh transfer policy at the blastocyst stage","volume":"34","author":"Papaleo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1907","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey253","article-title":"A\u00a0cost-effectiveness analysis of freeze-only or fresh embryo transfer in IVF of non-PCOS women","volume":"33","author":"Le","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2020.11.019","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of freeze-all policy - a retrospective study based upon the outcome of cumulative live births","volume":"60","author":"Chang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-113-2-147","article-title":"A\u00a0clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"113","author":"Detsky","year":"1990","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.307.6907.793","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"307","author":"Robinson","year":"1993","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.09.054","article-title":"Cost analysis model of outpatient management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with paracentesis:\u201cTap early and often\u201d versus hospitalization","volume":"93","author":"Csokmay","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/AEFU1104","article-title":"Transfer of thawed frozen embryo versus fresh embryo to improve the healthy baby rate in women undergoing IVF: the E-Freeze RCT","volume":"26","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2022","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab279","article-title":"Elective freezing of embryos versus fresh embryo transfer in IVF: a multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK (E-Freeze)","volume":"37","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib38","series-title":"Economic evaluation of Medically Assisted Reproduction: An educational overview of methods and applications for healthcare professionals","author":"Luyten","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.09.022","article-title":"In-vitro maturation versus IVF: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"42","author":"Braam","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex018","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of \u2018immediate IVF\u2019 versus \u2018delayed IVF\u2019: a prospective study","volume":"32","author":"Eijkemans","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1053719","DOI":"10.3389\/fmedt.2022.1053719","article-title":"Valuing infertility treatment: Why QALYs are inadequate, and an alternative approach to cost-effectiveness thresholds","volume":"4","author":"Keller","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front. Med. Technol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.1080\/1464770312331369153","article-title":"Funding fertility: issues in the allocation and distribution of resources to assisted reproduction technologies","volume":"6","author":"Devlin","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.022","article-title":"Medroxyprogesterone acetate is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in\u00a0vitro fertilization","volume":"104","author":"Kuang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib43","series-title":"The pharmaceutical benefits scheme","author":"Department of Health and Aged Care Australian Government","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-017-0990-7","article-title":"What is the best predictor of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in IVF? A cohort study","volume":"34","author":"Tarlatzi","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.11.008","article-title":"How frequent is severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after GnRH agonist triggering in high-risk women? A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"42","author":"Ioannidou","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2021.11.509","article-title":"POSC104 determining cost data for fertility treatment in a Spanish setting","volume":"25","author":"Roeder","year":"2022","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib47","article-title":"Determining cost data for fertility treatment in different European settings","author":"Chaudhari","year":"2023","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.10.037","article-title":"How many oocytes are optimal to achieve multiple live births with one stimulation cycle? The one-and-done approach","volume":"107","author":"Vaughan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deac104.010","article-title":"O-010 the One-and-Done Approach: does higher dosing of gonadotropins in predicted high and low responders increase the incidence of multiple live births from one ART-stimulation cycle?","volume":"37","author":"Schouten","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693422001845?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693422001845?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T17:14:00Z","timestamp":1761498840000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693422001845"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]},"references-count":50,"alternative-id":["S1521693422001845"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Freeze-all embryos during treatment with assisted reproduction: Health economic aspects","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2022.102303","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"102303"}}