{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T16:56:04Z","timestamp":1791219364851,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":58,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,1]],"date-time":"2025-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748736000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,1]],"date-time":"2025-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748736000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,1]],"date-time":"2025-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748736000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,1]],"date-time":"2025-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748736000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,1]],"date-time":"2025-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748736000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,1]],"date-time":"2025-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748736000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,1]],"date-time":"2025-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748736000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Best Practice &amp; Research Clinical Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,14]],"date-time":"2025-03-14T16:21:25Z","timestamp":1741969285000},"page":"102594","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Fetal Doppler assessment in pregnancy"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"100","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7974-4800","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jose H.","family":"Ochoa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Cafici","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1016\/0143-4004(92)90060-7","article-title":"Quantitative description of the elaboration and maturation of villi from 10 weeks of gestation to term","volume":"13","author":"Jackson","year":"1992","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1136\/jcp.2008.055277","article-title":"The anatomy of the normal placenta","volume":"61","author":"Huppertz","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Clin Pathol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1902","article-title":"Reference ranges for serial measurements of blood velocity and pulsatility index at the intra\u2010abdominal portion, and fetal and placental ends of the umbilical artery","volume":"26","author":"Acharya","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: Offic. J. Int. Soc. Ultra. Obstetr. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.019","article-title":"Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy","volume":"192","author":"Acharya","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340600604757","article-title":"Variation in Doppler indices along the length of the cord from the intraabdominal to the placental insertion","volume":"85","author":"Khare","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib6","first-page":"1","article-title":"Hyrtl's anastomosis, the only connection between the two umbilical arteries. A study in full term placentas from AGA infants with normal umbilical artery blood flow","volume":"80","author":"Ullberg","year":"2001","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23698","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): use of Doppler velocimetry in obstetrics","volume":"58","author":"Bhide","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: Offic. J. Inte. Soc. Ultra. Obstetr. Gynecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1996.08010027.x","article-title":"Single umbilical artery: analysis of Doppler flow indices and arterial diameters in normal and small\u2010for\u2010gestational age fetuses","volume":"8","author":"De Catte","year":"1996","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: Offic. J. Int. Soc. Ultra. Obstetr. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05086-z","article-title":"Reference charts for umbilical Doppler pulsatility index in fetuses with isolated two-vessel cord","volume":"299","author":"Contro","year":"2019","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13302","article-title":"Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler reference ranges in a twin population followed longitudinally from 24 to 38 weeks' gestation","volume":"44","author":"Mulcahy","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20102","article-title":"Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review","volume":"53","author":"Oros","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20380","article-title":"Clinical impact of Doppler reference charts on management of small\u2010for\u2010gestational\u2010age fetuses: need for standardization","volume":"56","author":"Ruiz\u2010Martinez","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib13","article-title":"ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler in the 11 to 13+ 6-week fetal ultrasound examination","volume":"37","author":"Salvesen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S844","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.11.1356","article-title":"The etiology of preeclampsia","volume":"226","author":"Jung","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.133","article-title":"Umbilical artery Doppler revisited: pathophysiology of changes in intrauterine growth restriction revealed","volume":"21","author":"Sebire","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: Offic. J. Int. Soc. Ultra. Obstetr. Gynecol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1159\/000359969","article-title":"Placental pathology in early-onset and late-onset fetal growth restriction","volume":"36","author":"Mifsud","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1055","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90783-7","article-title":"Effect of placental embolization on the umbilical arterial velocity waveform in fetal sheep","volume":"161","author":"Morrow","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1159\/000244233","article-title":"Umbilical vein pulsations and acid-base status at cordocentesis in growth-retarded fetuses with absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery","volume":"68","author":"Rizzo","year":"1995","journal-title":"Neonatology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2021.03.014","article-title":"Doppler studies of placental function","volume":"108","author":"Meler","year":"2021","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S774","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.566","article-title":"Risk of fetal death in growth-restricted fetuses with umbilical and\/or ductus venosus absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities before 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"218","author":"Caradeux","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02014.x","article-title":"A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation","volume":"110","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1072","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14511","article-title":"The association of neonatal morbidity with long\u2010term neurological outcome in infants who were growth restricted and preterm at birth: secondary analyses from TRUFFLE (Trial of Randomized Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe)","volume":"124","author":"Van Wassenaer","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70283-8","article-title":"The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"180","author":"Bahado-Singh","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199203000-00018","article-title":"Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"79","author":"Gramellini","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20","article-title":"The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited","volume":"21","author":"Baschat","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: Offic. J. Int. Soc. Ultra. Obstetr. Gynecol."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1159\/000508366","article-title":"Prescriptive reference standards of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and its physiological determinants","volume":"47","author":"Rial-Crestelo","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7738","article-title":"Longitudinal changes in uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral Doppler indices in late\u2010onset small\u2010for\u2010gestational age fetuses","volume":"37","author":"Oros","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00079.x","article-title":"Fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution in late gestation: identification of compromise in small fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler","volume":"15","author":"Hershkovitz","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6249","article-title":"Neurodevelopmental outcome in 2\u2010year\u2010old infants who were small\u2010for\u2010gestational age term fetuses with cerebral blood flow redistribution","volume":"32","author":"Eixarch","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: Offic. J. Int. Soc. Ultra. Obstetr. Gynecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2007.02.016","article-title":"Small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler have suboptimal perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome","volume":"136","author":"Figueras","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1159\/000357592","article-title":"Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol","volume":"36","author":"Figueras","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.024","article-title":"Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission?","volume":"213","author":"Khalil","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005","article-title":"Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome?","volume":"216","author":"Khalil","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15729","article-title":"Value of third\u2010trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss","volume":"47","author":"Khalil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19117","article-title":"Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta\u2010analysis","volume":"52","author":"Conde\u2010Agudelo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22134","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction","volume":"56","author":"Lees","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-014835","article-title":"Revealed versus concealed criteria for placental insufficiency in an unselected obstetric population in late pregnancy (RATIO37): randomised controlled trial study protocol","volume":"7","author":"Figueras","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"10426","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(23)02228-6","article-title":"Term planned delivery based on fetal growth assessment with or without the cerebroplacental ratio in low-risk pregnancies (RATIO37): an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"403","author":"Rial-Crestelo","year":"2024","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200001063420102","article-title":"Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization","volume":"342","author":"Mari","year":"2000","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.01.059","article-title":"Clinical Guideline# 8: the fetus at risk for anemia\u2013diagnosis and management","volume":"212","author":"Mari","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200001063420102","article-title":"Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization","volume":"342","author":"Mari","year":"2000","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib42","first-page":"746","article-title":"Longitudinal measurement of peak systolic velocity in the fetal middle cerebral artery for monitoring pregnancies complicated by red cell alloimmunisation: a prospective multicentre trial with intention-to-treat","volume":"109","author":"Zimmermann","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1882","article-title":"Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity for the diagnosis of fetal anemia: the untold story","volume":"25","author":"Mari","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: Offic. J. Int. Soc. Ultra. Obstetr. Gynecol."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20273","article-title":"Performance of fetal middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity for prediction of anemia in untransfused and transfused fetuses: systematic review and meta\u2010analysis","volume":"54","author":"Martinez\u2010Portilla","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1550","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.03.060","article-title":"Prediction of severe fetal anemia in red blood cell alloimmunization after previous intrauterine transfusions","volume":"195","author":"Scheier","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70504-7","article-title":"Blood flow and the degree of shunting through the ductus venosus in the human fetus","volume":"182","author":"Kiserud","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1992.02060389.x","article-title":"Foramen ovale: an ultrasonographic study of its relation to the inferior vena cava, ductus venosus and hepatic veins","volume":"2","author":"Kiserud","year":"1992","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: Offic. J. Int. Soc. Ultra. Obstetr. Gynecol."},{"issue":"8780","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1412","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(91)92720-M","article-title":"Ultrasonographic velocimetry of the fetal ductus venosus","volume":"338","author":"Kiserud","year":"1991","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib49","unstructured":"The Fetal Medicine Foundation. Ductus venosus flow | Certificates of competence | FMF certification | [cited July 20,2024]. Available https:\/\/fetalmedicine.org\/fmf-certification\/certificates-of-competence\/ductus-venosus-flow."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1347","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.11.018","article-title":"Simultaneous measurements of umbilical venous, fetal hepatic, and ductus venosus blood flow in growth-restricted human fetuses","volume":"190","author":"Bellotti","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12893","article-title":"Ductus venosus Doppler in the assessment of fetal cardiovascular health: an updated practical approach","volume":"95","author":"Seravalli","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.022","article-title":"Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"206","author":"Berkley","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.965","article-title":"Relationship between monitoring parameters and perinatal outcome in severe, early intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"23","author":"Bilardo","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: Offic. J. Int. Soc. Ultra. Obstetr. Gynecol."},{"issue":"9983","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62049-3","article-title":"2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial","volume":"385","author":"Lees","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6412","article-title":"Prospective validation of first\u2010trimester combined screening for trisomy 21","volume":"34","author":"Kagan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib56","first-page":"512","article-title":"Ductus venosus Doppler in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11\u201313 weeks of gestation","volume":"vol. 33","author":"Maiz","year":"2009"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1159\/000322138","article-title":"Contribution of ductus venosus Doppler in first-trimester screening for major cardiac defects","volume":"29","author":"Chelemen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1159\/000314036","article-title":"Ductus venosus in the first trimester: contribution to screening of chromosomal, cardiac defects and monochorionic twin complications","volume":"28","author":"Maiz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"}],"container-title":["Best Practice &amp; Research Clinical Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693425000185?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1521693425000185?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,2]],"date-time":"2025-06-02T11:23:03Z","timestamp":1748863383000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1521693425000185"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]},"references-count":58,"alternative-id":["S1521693425000185"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594","relation":{},"ISSN":["1521-6934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1521-6934","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Fetal Doppler assessment in pregnancy","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2025.102594","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"102594"}}