{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T17:15:28Z","timestamp":1778778928185,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,1]],"date-time":"2016-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1475280000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,1]],"date-time":"2016-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1475280000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"name":"European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7","award":["306088"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["306088"]}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004622","name":"Dutch Cancer Society","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["KWF UU 2009-4348"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["KWF UU 2009-4348"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004622","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","thebreastonline.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Breast"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,14]],"date-time":"2016-07-14T10:12:29Z","timestamp":1468491149000},"page":"49-54","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Consistency of breast density categories in serial screening mammograms: A comparison between automated and human assessment"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Katharina","family":"Holland","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jan","family":"van Zelst","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gerard J.","family":"den Heeten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mechli","family":"Imhof-Tas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ritse M.","family":"Mann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Carla H.","family":"van Gils","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nico","family":"Karssemeijer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr2942","article-title":"Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects","volume":"13","author":"Boyd","year":"2011","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-014-0439-1","article-title":"Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case\u2013control study of six alternative density assessment methods","volume":"16","author":"Eng","year":"2014","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034","article-title":"Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"McCormack","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr1829","article-title":"Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction","volume":"9","author":"Vachon","year":"2007","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00005","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study","volume":"155","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.7326\/M14-1465","article-title":"Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study","volume":"162","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2015150733","article-title":"Digital compared with screen-film mammography: measures of diagnostic accuracy among women screened in the Ontario breast screening program","volume":"278","author":"Prummel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.13.11969","article-title":"Dense breasts: a review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options","volume":"203","author":"Ho","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib9","series-title":"Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) atlas","author":"D'Orsi","year":"2003"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2004.12.004","article-title":"Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories","volume":"14","author":"Ciatto","year":"2005","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12443","article-title":"Misclassification of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) mammographic density and implications for breast density reporting legislation","author":"Gard","year":"2015","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1801","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/90.23.1801","article-title":"Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology breast imaging reporting and data system","volume":"90","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"1998","journal-title":"J\u00a0Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2007.04.007","article-title":"Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment","volume":"16","author":"Ooms","year":"2007","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1629","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/39\/10\/008","article-title":"The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities","volume":"39","author":"Byng","year":"1994","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7443","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/57\/22\/7443","article-title":"Volumetric breast density characteristics as determined from digital mammograms","volume":"57","author":"Alonzo-Proulx","year":"2012","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1109\/TMI.2005.862741","article-title":"Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms","volume":"25","author":"van Engeland","year":"2006","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Med Imaging"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib17","series-title":"Mammographic image analysis","author":"Highnam","year":"1999"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib18","series-title":"IWDM'10: proceedings of the 10th international workshop on digital mammography","first-page":"342","article-title":"Robust breast composition measurement \u2013 Volpara","author":"Highnam","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1867","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1493215","article-title":"A\u00a0calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography","volume":"29","author":"Kaufhold","year":"2002","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-1789","article-title":"Supplemental screening for breast cancer in women with dense breasts: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force","author":"Melnikow","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"W292","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.6049","article-title":"The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening","volume":"198","author":"Checka","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.15141686","article-title":"Reliability of automated breast density measurements","volume":"275","author":"Alonzo-Proulx","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2015.02.011","article-title":"Reproducibility of automated volumetric breast density assessment in short-term digital mammography reimaging","volume":"39","author":"Ko","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"692","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.12.10197","article-title":"Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment","volume":"201","author":"Gweon","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1177\/0284185114554674","article-title":"Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists' visual assessment: analysis of clinical-radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them","volume":"56","author":"Lee","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2013.01.011","article-title":"Automated volumetric breast density estimation: a comparison with visual assessment","volume":"68","author":"Seo","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib27","series-title":"5th International workshop on breast densitometry and breast cancer risk assessment","first-page":"38","article-title":"Assessing breast density change over time","author":"Highnam","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1080\/00949650701410249","article-title":"A\u00a0bootstrap method for comparing correlated kappa coefficients","volume":"78","author":"Vanbelle","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Stat Comput Simul"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","article-title":"The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data","volume":"33","author":"Landis","year":"1977","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib30","series-title":"Bootstrap program \u2013 pairwise agreement","author":"Vanbelle","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2005.10.010","article-title":"HRT use in 2001 and 2004 in The Netherlands \u2013 a world of difference","volume":"54","author":"de Jong-van den Berg","year":"2006","journal-title":"Maturitas"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib32","series-title":"Breast imaging \u2013 12th international workshop, IWDM 2014, Gifu City, Japan, June 29\u2013July 2, 2014 proceedings","article-title":"Stability of volumetric tissue composition measured in serial screening mammograms","author":"Holland","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib33","article-title":"This is what volumetric breast density is","author":"Gennaro","year":"2013","journal-title":"ECR"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4741.2012.01250.x","article-title":"Reproducibility of BI-RADS breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study","volume":"18","author":"Spayne","year":"2012","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"752","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12120221","article-title":"Reported mammographic density: film-screen versus digital acquisition","volume":"266","author":"Harvey","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0033-1335981","article-title":"Volumetric breast density assessment: reproducibility in serial examinations and comparison with visual assessment","volume":"185","author":"Singh","year":"2013","journal-title":"RoFo"}],"container-title":["The Breast"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0960977616300960?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0960977616300960?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,18]],"date-time":"2025-10-18T08:35:39Z","timestamp":1760776539000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0960977616300960"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"references-count":36,"alternative-id":["S0960977616300960"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020","relation":{},"ISSN":["0960-9776"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0960-9776","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Consistency of breast density categories in serial screening mammograms: A comparison between automated and human assessment","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Breast","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.breast.2016.06.020","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}